Suppr超能文献

一项评估血清甲状腺球蛋白标准的国际合作研究。

An international cooperative study evaluating serum thyroglobulin standards.

作者信息

Van Herle A J, Van Herle I S, Greipel M A

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985 Feb;60(2):338-43. doi: 10.1210/jcem-60-2-338.

Abstract

A number of research laboratories have reported great variability in the levels of serum thyroglobulin (Tg) in normal subjects, the reason for which is not immediately apparent. The present study was designed to determine how important these variations were by submitting three identical standards to all participating laboratories. Three lyophilized human sera (standards A, B, and C) with increasing concentrations of Tg (5.3, 30.6, and 80.6 ng/ml, respectively) were submitted to 37 laboratories (40 assays) in 18 different countries. Standard A gave detectable values in 19 assays. The mean serum Tg concentration was 6.3 +/- 1.4 (+/- SEM) ng/ml (n = 18). Standard B was detected in all but 3 assays. The mean serum Tg concentration in standard B was 15.7 +/- 1.4 ng/ml (n = 37). All laboratories were able to detect Tg in standard C, and reported a mean serum Tg concentration of 36.5 +/- 3.2 ng/ml (n = 40). Lyophilization affected the recovery of Tg in our assay. This was confirmed by a study in which lyophilized standards A, B, and C and frozen standards were analyzed in the same assays. The remarkable finding was that the variability in serum Tg values reported by the various assays was great despite the submission of an identical set of standards of each of the laboratories. Wide interassay variation raises problems with respect to the applicability of threshold levels proposed by certain studies. The latter is particularly germane to the follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. It is concluded that the development of a world standard for Tg may be a first and important step toward standardization of Tg assays, and that other components of the assays may need standardization as well.

摘要

一些研究实验室报告称,正常受试者血清甲状腺球蛋白(Tg)水平存在很大差异,其原因尚不明朗。本研究旨在通过向所有参与实验室提供三个相同的标准品来确定这些差异的重要程度。将三种Tg浓度递增的冻干人血清(标准品A、B和C,浓度分别为5.3、30.6和80.6 ng/ml)提交给18个不同国家的37个实验室(进行40次检测)。标准品A在19次检测中得到可检测值。标准品A的血清Tg平均浓度为6.3±1.4(±SEM)ng/ml(n = 18)。除3次检测外,标准品B在所有检测中均被检测到。标准品B的血清Tg平均浓度为15.7±1.4 ng/ml(n = 37)。所有实验室都能检测到标准品C中的Tg,报告的血清Tg平均浓度为36.5±3.2 ng/ml(n = 40)。冻干影响了我们检测中Tg的回收率。这在一项研究中得到了证实,该研究在相同检测中分析了冻干的标准品A、B和C以及冷冻的标准品。显著的发现是,尽管向每个实验室提交了一组相同的标准品,但各检测方法报告的血清Tg值差异很大。检测间的广泛差异给某些研究提出的阈值水平的适用性带来了问题。这一点对于分化型甲状腺癌患者的随访尤为重要。结论是,制定Tg的世界标准可能是Tg检测标准化的首要且重要的一步,并且检测的其他组成部分可能也需要标准化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验