• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尊重研究参与者支付流程的伦理考量。

Ethical considerations for respectful research participant payment processes.

作者信息

Duenas Devan M, Weiss Elliott Mark, Wilfond Benjamin S, Kraft Stephanie A

机构信息

Seattle Children's Research Institute, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov 4;8(1):e204. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.650. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.650
PMID:39655022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11626574/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Researchers and research organizations acknowledge the importance of paying research participants but often overlook the process of providing participant payments as a locus for improving equity and inclusion in clinical research. In this conceptual paper, we argue that participants' lived experiences and social context should be recognized and respected when developing these processes.

METHODS

We consider how participant payment processes that require specific payment types, delay the timing of payment, or require sharing sensitive information may impose barriers to equitable research. Building on findings from empirical research of participants' perspectives on respect in research and a relational ethics framework of person-oriented research ethics, we explore how researchers and research organizations can better demonstrate respect through the research participation payment process.

RESULTS

We propose five considerations for demonstrating respect when providing payment: (1) practice cultural humility, (2) be mindful of socioeconomic factors, (3) be flexible, (4) be transparent, and (5) maintain open communication. These considerations are intended to address the lack of existing ethical guidance around the process for participant payments and promote more inclusive clinical research. We provide a set of sample questions for research teams to consider how they could modify their payment processes to better demonstrate respect.

CONCLUSIONS

By better demonstrating respect for participants when providing payment, researchers can work toward ensuring that their research procedures are more inclusive, respond to the needs of diverse communities, and result in more equitable relationships with participants.

摘要

背景

研究人员和研究机构承认向研究参与者支付报酬的重要性,但往往忽视了提供参与者报酬这一过程,而这一过程是改善临床研究公平性和包容性的关键所在。在这篇概念性论文中,我们认为在制定这些流程时,应认识并尊重参与者的生活经历和社会背景。

方法

我们探讨了要求特定支付类型、延迟支付时间或要求分享敏感信息的参与者支付流程可能如何对公平研究造成障碍。基于对参与者在研究中对尊重的看法的实证研究结果以及以人为本的研究伦理的关系伦理框架,我们探索研究人员和研究机构如何通过研究参与支付流程更好地展现尊重。

结果

我们提出了在支付报酬时展现尊重的五点考量:(1)践行文化谦逊,(2)关注社会经济因素,(3)保持灵活性,(4)做到透明,(5)保持开放沟通。这些考量旨在解决围绕参与者支付流程缺乏现有伦理指导的问题,并促进更具包容性的临床研究。我们为研究团队提供了一组示例问题,供其思考如何修改支付流程以更好地展现尊重。

结论

通过在支付报酬时更好地展现对参与者的尊重,研究人员可以努力确保其研究程序更具包容性,回应不同社区的需求,并与参与者建立更公平的关系。

相似文献

1
Ethical considerations for respectful research participant payment processes.尊重研究参与者支付流程的伦理考量。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov 4;8(1):e204. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.650. eCollection 2024.
2
Participation With Compensation: Ethical Considerations for Research Payment Practices With People Who Are Incarcerated.有偿参与:针对囚犯研究支付实践的伦理考量
J Correct Health Care. 2024 Dec;30(6):368-373. doi: 10.1089/jchc.24.01.0002. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Paying patient and caregiver research participants: putting theory into practice.向患者及护理者研究参与者支付报酬:将理论付诸实践。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Apr;73(4):847-856. doi: 10.1111/jan.13222. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
4
Operationalising a real-time research ethics approach: supporting ethical mindfulness in agriculture-nutrition-health research in Malawi.将实时研究伦理方法付诸实践:支持马拉维农业-营养-健康研究中的伦理意识。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 11;23(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00740-1.
5
User Perspectives of a Web-Based Data-Sharing Platform (Open Humans) on Ethical Oversight in Participant-Led Research: Protocol for a Quantitative Study.基于网络的数据共享平台(开放人类)在参与者主导研究中的伦理监督方面的用户观点:一项定量研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Nov 28;7(11):e10939. doi: 10.2196/10939.
6
Paying research participants: a study of current practices in Australia.向研究参与者支付报酬:澳大利亚当前实践研究
J Med Ethics. 2005 Sep;31(9):542-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009290.
7
How can equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) principles be incorporated into research excellence with industry and community partners? Lessons learned from Canada and Australia on projects with a dementia focus.公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)原则如何与行业及社区合作伙伴共同融入卓越研究之中?加拿大和澳大利亚在以痴呆症为重点的项目中获得的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Oct 17;10(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00644-5.
8
Advancing health equity through partnerships of state Medicaid agencies, Medicaid managed care organizations, and health care delivery organizations.通过州医疗补助机构、医疗补助管理式医疗组织和医疗保健提供组织的伙伴关系,推进卫生公平。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;11:1104843. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1104843. eCollection 2023.
9
Person-oriented research ethics: integrating relational and everyday ethics in research.面向人的研究伦理:在研究中整合关系伦理和日常伦理。
Account Res. 2018;25(3):170-197. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1442218. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
10
"A Question of Trust" and "a Leap of Faith"-Study Participants' Perspectives on Consent, Privacy, and Trust in Smart Home Research: Qualitative Study.《信任的问题》和《信仰的飞跃》——智能家居研究中参与者对同意、隐私和信任的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 26;9(11):e25227. doi: 10.2196/25227.

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging communities as partners in health crisis response: a realist-informed scoping review for research and policy.将社区作为健康危机应对的合作伙伴:基于现实主义理论的研究和政策范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 May 6;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01139-1.
2
Equity Concerns Across Pediatric Research Recruitment: An Analysis of Research Staff Interviews.儿科研究招募中的公平性问题:研究人员访谈分析
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Mar;24(2):318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.06.032. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Toward equitable payment for inclusive participation.实现为包容性参与提供公平报酬。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 27;7(1):e58. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.5. eCollection 2023.
4
Relationship building in pediatric research recruitment: Insights from qualitative interviews with research staff.儿科研究招募中的关系建立:对研究人员进行定性访谈的见解
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Oct 3;6(1):e138. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.469. eCollection 2022.
5
Values and Practices to Strengthen Genetic Research Partnerships with Indigenous Communities.加强与原住民社区遗传研究伙伴关系的价值观和实践。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(4):583-592. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0079.
6
Toward Meeting the Obligation of Respect for Persons in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.迈向满足实用临床试验中尊重人的义务。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 May;52(3):9-17. doi: 10.1002/hast.1391.
7
A Research Publication and Grant Preparation Program for Native American Faculty in STEM: Implementation of the Six R's Indigenous Framework.一项针对美国原住民理工科教师的研究出版物与资助申请准备计划:六“R”本土框架的实施
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 11;12:734290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734290. eCollection 2021.
8
Combating Structural Inequities - Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical and Translational Research.应对结构性不平等——临床与转化研究中的多样性、公平性和包容性
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 20;386(3):201-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2112233. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
9
Perspectives on Genetic Research: Results From a Survey of Navajo Community Members.对基因研究的看法:纳瓦霍族社区成员调查结果
Front Genet. 2021 Dec 2;12:734529. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.734529. eCollection 2021.
10
Fair payment and just benefits to enhance diversity in clinical research.合理报酬与公平福利以促进临床研究的多样性。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 14;5(1):e159. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.816. eCollection 2021.