• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With a Moderate History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin (HEART) Score.具有中度病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和肌钙蛋白(HEART)评分患者的特征与结局
Cureus. 2024 Nov 9;16(11):e73343. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73343. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
E-HEART score: A novel scoring system for undifferentiated chest pain in the emergency department.E-HEART评分:一种用于急诊科未分化胸痛的新型评分系统。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 3;23(4):211-218. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_26_23. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Predictive risk stratification using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and initial troponin) and TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) scores in non-high risk chest pain patients: An African American urban community based hospital study.非高危胸痛患者中使用HEART(病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和初始肌钙蛋白)和TIMI(心肌梗死溶栓)评分进行预测性风险分层:一项基于非裔美国城市社区医院的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(32):e16370. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016370.
5
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
6
Risk Stratification of Acute-Onset Chest Pain: SVEAT Score Versus HEART and TIMI Scores.急性胸痛的风险分层:SVEAT评分与HEART及TIMI评分的比较
Cureus. 2023 May 28;15(5):e39590. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39590. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Mortality and Morbidity Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Low-Level PM, BC, NO, and O: An Analysis of European Cohorts in the ELAPSE Project.长期暴露于低水平 PM、BC、NO 和 O 对死亡率和发病率的影响:ELAPSE 项目中欧洲队列的分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2021 Sep;2021(208):1-127.
8
Association of Chest Pain Protocol-Discordant Discharge With Outcomes Among Emergency Department Patients With Modest Elevations of High-Sensitivity Troponin.胸痛协议不相符出院与急诊高敏肌钙蛋白轻度升高患者结局的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2226809. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26809.
9
Impact of the HEART Pathway on Admission Rates for Emergency Department Patients with Chest Pain: An External Clinical Validation Study.HEART 路径对急诊科胸痛患者入院率的影响:一项外部临床验证研究。
J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;54(4):549-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.038. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
10
A novel cardiovascular risk stratification model incorporating ECG and heart rate variability for patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.一种针对因胸痛就诊于急诊科的患者,纳入心电图和心率变异性的新型心血管风险分层模型。
Crit Care. 2016 Jun 11;20(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1367-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Can ED chest pain patients with intermediate HEART scores be managed as outpatients?ED 胸痛且 HEART 评分处于中间范围的患者能否作为门诊患者进行管理?
CJEM. 2022 Nov;24(7):770-779. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00355-4. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
2
D-Dimer Tests in the Emergency Department: Current Insights.急诊科的D-二聚体检测:当前见解
Open Access Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 11;13:465-479. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S238696. eCollection 2021.
3
Major adverse cardiovascular event definitions used in observational analysis of administrative databases: a systematic review.行政数据库观察性分析中使用的主要不良心血管事件定义:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01440-5.
4
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Complete Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术在冠状动脉疾病全面评估中的应用:JACC 最新技术评价。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Aug 17;78(7):713-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.019.
5
A Prospective Evaluation of Clinical HEART Score Agreement, Accuracy, and Adherence in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients.前瞻性评估急诊胸痛患者临床 HEART 评分的一致性、准确性和依从性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;78(2):231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
6
Does Hospital Admission/Observation for Chest Pain Improve Patient Outcomes after Emergency Department Evaluation for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome?因疑似急性冠脉综合征而于急诊科就诊的患者,住院/留观治疗胸痛能否改善其预后?
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Mar;37(4):745-752. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06841-2. Epub 2021 May 14.
7
The Impact Of The COVID-19 Pandemic On Hospital Admissions In The United States.**译文**:新冠疫情对美国住院人数的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Nov;39(11):2010-2017. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00980. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
8
HEART Score of Four for Age and Risk Factors: A Case Series.年龄与危险因素的HEART评分四分法:病例系列
Cureus. 2020 Aug 5;12(8):e9576. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9576.
9
Clinical Outcomes of Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Combined With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Guided Strategy.动态计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像联合冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影与冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影指导策略的临床结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jan;13(1):e009775. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009775. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
10
The HEART Score for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in U.S. Emergency Departments.美国急诊科疑似急性冠状动脉综合征的HEART评分
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 9;72(15):1875-1877. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.059.

具有中度病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和肌钙蛋白(HEART)评分患者的特征与结局

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With a Moderate History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin (HEART) Score.

作者信息

Jewett Leslie, Hollman Nicholas, DesPrez Roger, Baker Andrew, McNulty Emily, Gentges Joshua

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, CHI St. Vincent Hot Springs, Hot Springs, USA.

Biostatistics, The University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Nov 9;16(11):e73343. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73343. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.73343
PMID:39655101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11627430/
Abstract

Introduction Chest pain is a common, expensive cause of admission to the hospital from the Emergency Department (ED). The History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin (HEART) score is a risk stratification tool often used to determine the disposition of chest pain patients. This study evaluates the association of age, gender, HEART score, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), hypercholesterolemia, family history (Fam Hx), and tobacco use with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and hospital readmission. While low-risk HEART score patients are generally discharged and high-risk patients generally admitted, data is limited on the appropriate disposition strategy for moderate-risk patients. Our goal is to understand the risks of cardiovascular morbidity, the studies performed, and the factors associated with readmission in moderate HEART score patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using ED records from March 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019. Patients with a moderate HEART score (4-6) were included. Data on additional testing and outcomes were collected. Statistical analyses included Pearson Chi-square tests and unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression to assess associations between explanatory variables and outcomes. Multicollinearity was assessed with all variance inflation factors below 1.3. To evaluate how well the logistic model performed an area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed, with values of 0.68 (cardiovascular morbidity events) and 0.67 (readmission) respectively. No pre-existing AUC cutoff was used. Results The study included 959 patients with a moderate HEART score. The average age was 58.9 years, and 486 (50.7%) were male. Cardiovascular disease morbidity events occurred in 72 (7.5%) of patients, and 108 (11.3%) were readmitted within six weeks. Higher HEART scores, male gender, and diabetes were significantly associated with increased odds of cardiovascular morbidity. Male gender, tobacco use, and hypercholesterolemia were significantly associated with hospital readmission. The percutaneous intervention occurred in 60 (6.3%) patients, coronary bypass grafting in 10 (1.0%), and cerebrovascular accident in two (0.2%). Myocardial perfusion imaging was performed in 421 (43.9%) of patients and echocardiogram in 445 (46.4%), while computerized tomography coronary angiogram was performed in 99 (10.3%). No deaths were identified in our study. Discussion The findings suggest that higher HEART scores, male gender, and diabetes are significant predictors of cardiovascular morbidity, while male gender, tobacco use, and hypercholesterolemia predict hospital readmission. Reliance on ED records could limit study generalizability as we did not capture direct admissions. The retrospective design could introduce bias from confounding variables. Most of the testing and intervention during hospitalization could reasonably have been performed in an outpatient setting. Conclusion This study provides quantitative data on the utility of hospitalization for moderate-risk HEART score patients. The results support the potential for outpatient management in certain cases, especially those with HEART scores of 4. Future studies should include randomized controlled trials comparing the discharge of moderate HEART score patients with inpatient management.

摘要

引言

胸痛是急诊科(ED)常见且花费高昂的住院原因。病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和肌钙蛋白(HEART)评分是一种常用于确定胸痛患者处置方式的风险分层工具。本研究评估年龄、性别、HEART评分、糖尿病(DM)、高血压(HTN)、高胆固醇血症、家族史(Fam Hx)和吸烟与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)及再次入院的关联。虽然低风险HEART评分患者通常出院,高风险患者通常入院,但关于中度风险患者的适当处置策略的数据有限。我们的目标是了解中度HEART评分患者的心血管发病风险、已开展的研究以及与再次入院相关的因素。

方法

采用2018年3月1日至2019年3月31日的急诊科记录进行回顾性队列研究。纳入HEART评分为中度(4 - 6)的患者。收集关于进一步检查和结局的数据。统计分析包括Pearson卡方检验以及未调整和调整后的逻辑回归,以评估解释变量与结局之间的关联。使用所有方差膨胀因子低于1.3来评估多重共线性。为评估逻辑模型的表现,进行了曲线下面积(AUC)分析,心血管发病事件的值为0.68,再次入院的值为0.67。未使用预先设定的AUC临界值。

结果

该研究纳入了959例HEART评分为中度的患者。平均年龄为58.9岁,486例(50.7%)为男性。72例(7.5%)患者发生心血管疾病发病事件,108例(11.3%)在六周内再次入院。较高的HEART评分、男性性别和糖尿病与心血管发病几率增加显著相关。男性性别、吸烟和高胆固醇血症与再次入院显著相关。60例(6.3%)患者接受了经皮介入治疗,10例(1.0%)接受了冠状动脉搭桥术,2例(0.2%)发生了脑血管意外。421例(43.9%)患者进行了心肌灌注成像,445例(46.4%)进行了超声心动图检查,99例(10.3%)进行了计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影。本研究中未发现死亡病例。

讨论

研究结果表明,较高的HEART评分、男性性别和糖尿病是心血管发病的重要预测因素,而男性性别、吸烟和高胆固醇血症可预测再次入院。由于我们未获取直接入院情况,依赖急诊科记录可能会限制研究的可推广性。回顾性设计可能会引入混杂变量的偏差。住院期间的大多数检查和干预在门诊环境中本可合理进行。

结论

本研究提供了关于中度风险HEART评分患者住院效用的定量数据。结果支持在某些情况下,特别是HEART评分为4的患者,进行门诊管理的可能性。未来的研究应包括随机对照试验,比较中度HEART评分患者出院与住院管理的情况。