• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘试验中的导入期与治疗结果:一项叙述性综述。

Run-in periods and treatment outcomes in asthma trials: A narrative review.

作者信息

Pizzichini Emilio, Brusselle Guy, Edwards Dawn, Gibson Peter G, Kerstjens Huib A, Moore Alison, Slade David, Wise Robert A, Zhang Shiyuan

机构信息

GSK, London, UK.

Federal University of Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Oct 15;42:101382. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101382. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101382
PMID:39655310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11626073/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The run-in period is an important element of randomized controlled trials, and is often used in respiratory disease trials. The design of the run-in period can greatly impact results and data interpretation, and as such should be designed carefully.

METHODS

In this review, we describe the design of run-in periods across six phase 3A trials of triple therapy in asthma, and discuss how differences in run-in period design (specifically the duration, treatment, and reporting of run-in results) may have the potential to alter the interpretation of study outcomes.

RESULTS

We found that the duration of run-in periods ranged between 2 and 7 weeks, with some studies including a combination of screening, run-in and stabilization periods, and others including a run-in period only. Run-in treatment also varied, with some studies running in patients on their previous inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy, and others harmonizing treatment by switching to the same ICS/LABA combination used in the on-treatment phase, or a different ICS/LABA combination entirely. Most of the studies included did not report any changes to study outcomes seen prior to randomization.

CONCLUSION

We discuss the potential implications associated with the various trial designs, and propose that run-in periods should be consciously designed to meet the goals of the specific study. We also propose that standardized reporting of run-in changes would further allow for differentiation between improvements due to improved adherence and true treatment benefits, and aid with comparing data from different clinical trials.

摘要

背景

导入期是随机对照试验的一个重要组成部分,常用于呼吸系统疾病试验。导入期的设计会对结果和数据解读产生重大影响,因此应谨慎设计。

方法

在本综述中,我们描述了六项哮喘三联疗法3A期试验的导入期设计,并讨论了导入期设计的差异(特别是导入期的持续时间、治疗方法以及导入期结果的报告方式)如何可能改变对研究结果的解读。

结果

我们发现导入期的持续时间在2至7周之间,一些研究包括筛查、导入和稳定期的组合,而其他研究仅包括导入期。导入期治疗也有所不同,一些研究让患者继续使用之前的吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β受体激动剂(ICS/LABA)疗法,而其他研究则通过改用治疗期使用的相同ICS/LABA组合或完全不同的ICS/LABA组合来统一治疗。大多数纳入的研究没有报告随机分组前观察到的研究结果有任何变化。

结论

我们讨论了各种试验设计的潜在影响,并建议应精心设计导入期以实现特定研究的目标。我们还建议,对导入期变化进行标准化报告将进一步有助于区分因依从性提高而带来的改善和真正的治疗益处,并有助于比较来自不同临床试验的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1b/11626073/e99586bf06ac/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1b/11626073/e99586bf06ac/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1b/11626073/e99586bf06ac/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Run-in periods and treatment outcomes in asthma trials: A narrative review.哮喘试验中的导入期与治疗结果:一项叙述性综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Oct 15;42:101382. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101382. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to combination long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) versus LABA/ICS for adults with asthma.长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)联合长效β2受体激动剂和吸入性糖皮质激素(LABA/ICS)与LABA/ICS用于成人哮喘患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 21;2016(1):CD011721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011721.pub2.
3
Long-acting beta2-agonists for chronic asthma in adults and children where background therapy contains varied or no inhaled corticosteroid.用于成人和儿童慢性哮喘的长效β2受体激动剂,其背景治疗包含不同种类或不包含吸入性糖皮质激素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD001385. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001385.pub2.
4
Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus addition of long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) for adults with asthma.对于成年哮喘患者,长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)联合吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)与联合长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 2;2015(6):CD011438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011438.pub2.
5
[Guidelines for the prevention and management of bronchial asthma (2024 edition)].[支气管哮喘防治指南(2024年版)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2025 Mar 12;48(3):208-248. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20241013-00601.
6
Effectiveness and tolerability of dual and triple combination inhaler therapies compared with each other and varying doses of inhaled corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with asthma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较双三联吸入疗法与吸入性皮质类固醇不同剂量治疗青少年和成人哮喘的有效性和耐受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 6;12(12):CD013799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013799.pub2.
7
Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的长效吸入疗法(β受体激动剂、抗胆碱能药物和类固醇):一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 26;2014(3):CD010844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010844.pub2.
8
Combination of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled steroids versus higher dose of inhaled steroids in children and adults with persistent asthma.吸入长效β2受体激动剂与吸入性糖皮质激素联合使用与高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素治疗儿童和成人持续性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.
9
Systematic review and economic analysis of the comparative effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids and their usage with long-acting beta2 agonists for the treatment of chronic asthma in children under the age of 12 years.不同吸入性糖皮质激素及其与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用治疗12岁以下儿童慢性哮喘的比较效果的系统评价和经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(20):1-174, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta12200.
10
Addition of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled steroids as first line therapy for persistent asthma in steroid-naive adults and children.对于未使用过类固醇的成人和儿童持续性哮喘,吸入长效β2受体激动剂联合吸入性类固醇作为一线治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD005307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005307.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of extrafine and non-extrafine inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists as maintenance and reliever therapy in asthma: a randomized open-label crossover trial.超细微与非超细微吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β2受体激动剂作为哮喘维持和缓解治疗的比较:一项随机开放标签交叉试验
Korean J Intern Med. 2025 May;40(3):491-501. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2024.393. Epub 2025 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI in patients with inadequately controlled asthma (CAPTAIN): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3A trial.每日一次单吸入器三联疗法(FF/UMEC/VI)与FF/VI治疗哮喘控制不佳患者的疗效和安全性(CAPTAIN):一项双盲、随机、3A期试验
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):69-84. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30389-1. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Use of Run-in Periods in Randomized Trials.随机试验中导入期的使用。
JAMA. 2020 Jul 14;324(2):188-189. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6463.
3
Once-daily, single-inhaler mometasone-indacaterol-glycopyrronium versus mometasone-indacaterol or twice-daily fluticasone-salmeterol in patients with inadequately controlled asthma (IRIDIUM): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 3 study.
每日一次、单吸入器糠酸莫米松-茚达特罗-格隆铵与糠酸莫米松-茚达特罗或每日两次氟替卡松-沙美特罗治疗控制不佳的哮喘患者(IRIDIUM):一项随机、双盲、对照的 3 期研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Oct;8(10):1000-1012. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30190-9. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
4
Real-World Data and Randomised Controlled Trials: The Salford Lung Study.真实世界数据与随机对照试验:索尔福德肺研究。
Adv Ther. 2020 Mar;37(3):977-997. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01192-1. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
5
Single inhaler extrafine triple therapy in uncontrolled asthma (TRIMARAN and TRIGGER): two double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, controlled phase 3 trials.单吸入器超细三联疗法治疗未控制的哮喘(TRIMARAN 和 TRIGGER):两项双盲、平行组、随机、对照 3 期试验。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1737-1749. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32215-9. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
Randomized clinical trials with run-in periods: frequency, characteristics and reporting.设有导入期的随机临床试验:频率、特征与报告
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 11;11:169-184. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S188752. eCollection 2019.
7
After asthma: redefining airways diseases.哮喘之后:重新定义气道疾病。
Lancet. 2018 Jan 27;391(10118):350-400. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30879-6. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
8
Effectiveness of fluticasone furoate plus vilanterol on asthma control in clinical practice: an open-label, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.氟替卡松维兰特罗在临床实践中对哮喘控制的疗效:一项开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Nov 18;390(10109):2247-2255. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32397-8. Epub 2017 Sep 10.
9
Inhaled Corticosteroids.吸入性糖皮质激素
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2010 Mar 8;3(3):514-540. doi: 10.3390/ph3030514.
10
Tiotropium improves lung function, exacerbation rate, and asthma control, independent of baseline characteristics including age, degree of airway obstruction, and allergic status.噻托溴铵可改善肺功能、降低急性加重率并控制哮喘,这与包括年龄、气道阻塞程度和过敏状态在内的基线特征无关。
Respir Med. 2016 Aug;117:198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jun 14.