Suppr超能文献

超细微与非超细微吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β2受体激动剂作为哮喘维持和缓解治疗的比较:一项随机开放标签交叉试验

Comparison of extrafine and non-extrafine inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists as maintenance and reliever therapy in asthma: a randomized open-label crossover trial.

作者信息

Lee Sang Pyo, Lee Sang Min, Kang Sung-Yoon

机构信息

Division of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.

Division of Respiratory Disease and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Intern Med. 2025 May;40(3):491-501. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2024.393. Epub 2025 Apr 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Asthma is characterized by chronic inflammation. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory therapy, targeting both the large and small airways.

METHODS

This randomized open-label crossover trial included 30 patients receiving step 3 inhaled medication according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Patients received beclomethasone/formoterol (BDP/F) for maintenance and reliever therapy for 6 weeks, followed by budesonide/formoterol (BUD/F) for 6 weeks, or vice versa, with a 4-week washout period in between. Assessments at each visit included the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire, Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics, and pulmonary function test. The primary endpoint was the change in forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25-75% pred).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (15 females, mean age 39.3 years) completed the study. The changes in FEF25-75% pred were comparable between BDP/F and BUD/F (5.79 ± 38.34 vs. -1.36 ± 14.93, p = 0.399). No significant differences were observed between the BDP/F and BUD/F groups in terms of improvement in asthma control or quality of life. However, in the subgroup of patients with positive methacholine bronchial provocation tests, BDP/F significantly improved ACT scores compared to BUD/F (0.92 ± 2.25 vs. -1.31 ± 3.04, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that extrafine ICS treatment provided no significant advantage over non-extrafine ICS in improving small airway obstruction or overall asthma control in moderate asthma. This suggests that factors other than particle size may contribute to treatment outcomes.

摘要

背景/目的:哮喘的特征为慢性炎症。吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)仍然是抗炎治疗的基石,作用于大、小气道。

方法

这项随机开放标签交叉试验纳入了30例根据全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)接受3级吸入药物治疗的患者。患者接受倍氯米松/福莫特罗(BDP/F)维持和缓解治疗6周,随后接受布地奈德/福莫特罗(BUD/F)治疗6周,或反之,期间有4周的洗脱期。每次就诊时的评估包括哮喘控制测试(ACT)、哮喘控制问卷、韩国成年哮喘患者生活质量问卷和肺功能测试。主要终点是肺活量25%至75%之间的用力呼气流量(FEF25-75%预计值)的变化。

结果

24例患者(15例女性,平均年龄39.3岁)完成了研究。BDP/F和BUD/F组之间FEF25-75%预计值的变化相当(5.79±38.34对-1.36±14.93,p=0.399)。BDP/F和BUD/F组在哮喘控制改善或生活质量方面未观察到显著差异。然而,在乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验阳性的患者亚组中,与BUD/F相比,BDP/F显著改善了ACT评分(0.92±2.25对-1.31±3.04,p=0.044)。

结论

我们的研究表明,在改善中度哮喘的小气道阻塞或总体哮喘控制方面,超细微粒ICS治疗与非超细微粒ICS相比无显著优势。这表明除颗粒大小外的其他因素可能影响治疗结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d1d/12081104/56816603d721/kjim-2024-393f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验