Hamilton Annelie, Tallberg Pia, Ilahi Frida, Hoff Eva, Ahmadi Bahar, Daukantaitė Daiva
Child and Adolescent, Psychiatric Clinic in Helsingborg, Helsingborg, Sweden.
Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Child Neuropsychol. 2025 Jul;31(5):771-790. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2434736. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
While several rating scales reliably and cost-effectively assess behavioral executive functioning (EF) in youths with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), questions remain about the impact of comorbidities and dual NDDs on EF as measured by these scales in clinical samples. This study compared behavioral EF profiles among youths with NDDs, both with and without psychiatric comorbidities, non-NDDs (e.g. anxiety), and controls, as well as youths with single versus dual NDDs. The comparisons were made using the Swedish version of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-2) parent form. Participants included 79 youths (mean [SD] age 12.1 [3.0]; 50.6% girls) diagnosed with various psychiatric conditions, and 151 matched controls (mean [SD] age 12.4 [2.8]; 51.7% girls). Results showed significant differences with very large effect sizes in all behavioral EF domains among youths with NDDs, regardless of whether they had non-NDD psychiatric comorbidities, compared to youths with non-NDDs or controls. The latter two groups differed in six of eight behavioral EF domains, with the Shift domain showing the largest effect size (Cohen's d = 0.94). Surprisingly, no significant differences were found between the NDD-only group and the NDD group with non-NDD psychiatric comorbidities. Youths with dual NDDs had more deficits in four of the nine behavioral EF domains compared to those with a single NDD, with the Shift domain again showing the largest effect size (Cohen's d = 0.91). This study highlights the essential role of NDD in distinguishing clinically significant parent-rated behavioral EF deficits in youths, regardless of other psychiatric diagnoses.
虽然有几种评定量表能够可靠且经济高效地评估神经发育障碍(NDD)青少年的行为执行功能(EF),但在临床样本中,这些量表所测量的共病和双重NDD对EF的影响仍存在疑问。本研究比较了患有NDD的青少年(有和没有精神共病)、非NDD(如焦虑症)青少年、对照组以及患有单一NDD与双重NDD的青少年之间的行为EF特征。使用执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF - 2)瑞典语版的家长版进行比较。参与者包括79名被诊断患有各种精神疾病的青少年(平均[标准差]年龄12.1[3.0]岁;50.6%为女孩)和151名匹配的对照组(平均[标准差]年龄12.4[2.8]岁;51.7%为女孩)。结果显示,与非NDD青少年或对照组相比,患有NDD的青少年在所有行为EF领域均存在显著差异,效应量非常大,无论他们是否有非NDD精神共病。后两组在八个行为EF领域中的六个存在差异,其中转换领域的效应量最大(科恩d值 = 0.94)。令人惊讶的是,仅患有NDD的组与患有非NDD精神共病的NDD组之间未发现显著差异。与患有单一NDD的青少年相比,患有双重NDD的青少年在九个行为EF领域中的四个存在更多缺陷,转换领域的效应量再次最大(科恩d值 = 0.91)。本研究强调了NDD在区分青少年临床上具有显著意义的家长评定行为EF缺陷方面的重要作用,无论其他精神诊断如何。