Ren Yujie, Li Yujiang, Chu Xiaoqiu, Chen Guofang, Han Xue, Zhao Yueting, Liu Chao, Wang Jianhua, Xu Shuhang
Endocr Connect. 2025 Jan 6;14(2). doi: 10.1530/EC-24-0366. Print 2025 Feb 1.
To evaluate the therapeutic effects of microwave ablation (MWA) versus surgery in treating low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) and to assess recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with and without the BRAFV600E mutation.
Between August 2016 and September 2022, 158 patients diagnosed with low-risk PTMC treated with MWA and 288 patients who underwent surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were followed-up for over a year. Local tumor progression (LTP), RFS and adverse events associated with both treatments were monitored. Following propensity score matching (PSM), comparisons were made regarding LTP, RFS, complications and treatment variables.
Prior to matching, MWA patients were younger than those in the surgery group (38 (30.75, 47) vs 43 (34, 50.75), P = 0.000). Tumors treated with MWA had smaller maximum diameters (5.7 (4.6, 7.0) vs 6.9 (5.8, 8.6), P = 0.000) and volumes (70.7 (35.2, 120.9) vs 122.0 (63.9, 228.8), P = 0.000). After 1:1 PSM, each group contained 141 patients with comparable baseline characteristics. During the follow-up, LTP developed in nine patients: six in the MWA group and three in the surgery group. There were no cases of distant metastasis or cancer-related deaths. Adjusting for age, sex, tumor location and largest diameter, there was no significant association between treatment modality and recurrence (HR = 3.75, 95% CI: 0.94-14.98, P = 0.062). There were no significant differences in RFS between patients with and without the BRAFV600E mutation in both groups (P = 0.45 and 0.74, respectively). Furthermore, the incidence of complications was comparable between treatments.
Both MWA and surgical treatment offer similar efficacy and safety profiles for managing low-risk PTMC. MWA may represent a viable alternative to conventional surgical approaches, especially for patients harboring the BRAFV600E mutation.
评估微波消融(MWA)与手术治疗低危甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)的疗效,并评估有无BRAFV600E突变患者的无复发生存期(RFS)。
回顾性分析2016年8月至2022年9月期间158例接受MWA治疗的低危PTMC患者和288例接受手术治疗的患者。所有患者均随访1年以上。监测局部肿瘤进展(LTP)、RFS以及与两种治疗相关的不良事件。在倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,对LTP、RFS、并发症和治疗变量进行比较。
匹配前,MWA组患者比手术组患者年轻(38(30.75,47)岁 vs 43(34,50.75)岁,P = 0.000)。MWA治疗的肿瘤最大直径较小(5.7(4.6,7.0)mm vs 6.9(5.8,8.6)mm,P = 0.000),体积也较小(70.7(35.2,120.9)mm³ vs 122.0(63.9,228.8)mm³,P = 0.000)。在1:1 PSM后,每组各有141例患者,基线特征具有可比性。随访期间,9例患者出现LTP:MWA组6例,手术组3例。无远处转移或癌症相关死亡病例。校正年龄、性别、肿瘤位置和最大直径后,治疗方式与复发之间无显著关联(HR = 3.75,95%CI:0.94 - 14.98,P = 0.062)。两组中有和无BRAFV600E突变患者的RFS无显著差异(分别为P = 0.45和0.74)。此外,两种治疗的并发症发生率相当。
MWA和手术治疗在管理低危PTMC方面具有相似的疗效和安全性。MWA可能是传统手术方法的可行替代方案,尤其是对于携带BRAFV600E突变的患者。