• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用动态导航进行颧骨种植体植入:一项比较准确性的尸体研究。

The Use of Dynamic Navigation for the Placement of Zygoma Implants: A Cadaver Study to Compare Accuracy.

作者信息

Bishbish Zeino Omran, Kim Yoon Jeong, Kan Joseph, Lozada Jaime

机构信息

Advance Education in Periodontics, Loma Linda University, Redlands, California.

Periodontics department, Loma Linda University, Redlands, California.

出版信息

J Oral Implantol. 2024 Dec 1;50(6):644-652. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00026.

DOI:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00026
PMID:39656190
Abstract

This study aimed to compare the angular, platform, and apical deviation of zygoma implants placed with the aid of a dynamic navigation (DN) device compared with the implants placed freehand. Eight cadaver heads were used for the study. Preoperative cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans were made for the heads, and an implant-planning software was used to plan zygoma implants bilaterally in each scanned head. A total of 16 zygoma implants were placed using each surgical technique. Postimplant CBCT scans were merged with the preoperative plan to evaluate and compare the accuracy of the implants using each technique. Angular and linear deviations of the implants were measured and compared. The effect of implant length and position on the deviation was also investigated. The results showed a mean angular deviation of 2.44° ± 1.10° for implants placed using DN compared with 6.63° ± 4.81° for implants placed freehand. The mean apical deviation for implants placed using DN and for implants placed freehand was 2.14 ± 1.02 mm and 3.80 ± 2.49 mm, respectively. Finally, the mean platform deviation for implants placed using DN and for implants placed freehand was 1.66 ± 0.9 mm and 2.81 ± 2.1 mm, respectively. The analysis showed a significant difference between the two techniques in angular and apical deviation (p = .001 and .029, respectively). Zygoma implants placed with a DN device resulted in less apical and angular deviation than implants placed freehand.

摘要

本研究旨在比较借助动态导航(DN)设备植入的颧骨种植体与徒手植入的种植体在角度、平台和根尖的偏差。该研究使用了八个尸头。对这些头部进行术前锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),并使用种植体规划软件在每个扫描的头部双侧规划颧骨种植体。每种手术技术共植入16枚颧骨种植体。将植入后的CBCT扫描与术前计划进行融合,以评估和比较每种技术植入种植体的准确性。测量并比较种植体的角度和线性偏差。还研究了种植体长度和位置对偏差的影响。结果显示,使用DN植入的种植体平均角度偏差为2.44°±1.10°,而徒手植入的种植体平均角度偏差为6.63°±4.81°。使用DN植入的种植体和徒手植入的种植体的平均根尖偏差分别为2.14±1.02mm和3.80±2.49mm。最后,使用DN植入的种植体和徒手植入的种植体的平均平台偏差分别为1.66±0.9mm和2.81±2.1mm。分析表明,两种技术在角度和根尖偏差方面存在显著差异(分别为p = 0.001和0.029)。使用DN设备植入的颧骨种植体比徒手植入的种植体产生的根尖和角度偏差更小。

相似文献

1
The Use of Dynamic Navigation for the Placement of Zygoma Implants: A Cadaver Study to Compare Accuracy.使用动态导航进行颧骨种植体植入:一项比较准确性的尸体研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2024 Dec 1;50(6):644-652. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00026.
2
Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.动态计算机辅助种植体植入的准确性评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
3
Accuracy and safety of dynamic navigation vs. freehand approach in indirect sinus lift and immediate implant placement: A split mouth clinical study.间接上颌窦提升和即刻种植术中动态导航与徒手操作方法的准确性和安全性:一项双侧对照临床研究。
J Dent. 2025 Sep;160:105866. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105866. Epub 2025 May 29.
4
Accuracy of immediate anterior implantation using static and robotic computer-assisted implant surgery: A retrospective study.使用静态和机器人计算机辅助种植手术进行即刻前牙种植的准确性:一项回顾性研究。
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105218. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105218. Epub 2024 Jun 30.
5
Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies.计算机辅助手术中种植体植入的准确性:一项比较尸体研究、临床研究和体外研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 January/February;33(1):101–115. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5556. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Accuracy in dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing computer-assisted (static, dynamic, robotics) and noncomputer-assisted (freehand, conventional guide) approaches.牙种植体植入的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较计算机辅助(静态、动态、机器人辅助)和非计算机辅助(徒手、传统导板)方法。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.038.
7
Accuracy of Augmented Reality-Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.增强现实辅助导航在牙种植术中的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 4;25:e42040. doi: 10.2196/42040.
8
Does Freehand, Patient-specific Instrumentation or Surgical Navigation Perform Better for Allograft Reconstruction After Tumor Resection? A Preclinical Synthetic Bone Study.游离手、患者特异性器械或手术导航在肿瘤切除后同种异体骨重建中效果更好吗?一项临床前合成骨研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1896-1908. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003116. Epub 2024 May 15.
9
Impact of Cantilever Length on the Accuracy of Static CAIS in Posterior Distal Free-End Regions.悬臂长度对后牙远中游离端区域静态计算机辅助种植手术准确性的影响。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Apr;27(2):e70020. doi: 10.1111/cid.70020.
10
Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta-analyses on flapless fully guided surgery.微创牙种植体植入术:无瓣全引导手术的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Periodontol 2000. 2023 Feb;91(1):89-112. doi: 10.1111/prd.12440. Epub 2022 Jul 30.