Muñoz José M, Bernacer Javier
International Center for Neuroscience and Ethics (CINET), Tatiana Foundation.
Institute of Neurotechnology and Law (INL).
AJOB Neurosci. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):60-65. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2024.2424602. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
As is usually the case with other topics addressed by neuroethics, a rigorous analysis of neurorights requires an interdisciplinary approach. In response to this need and in the context of the global expansion of regulatory initiatives on neurorights, we coordinated, under the auspices of the International Center for Neuroscience and Ethics (CINET), an introductory course on neurorights from a neuroscientific perspective. The course, aimed at sixty students from diverse backgrounds (neuroscience, psychology, and law, among others), consisted of a 10-hr training that showed the current approaches and discussions on neurorights and outlined cutting-edge technologies to register, analyze, and manipulate human brain activity from a realistic stance. The course succeeded in discarding some concerns and uncovering others not frequently found in the neurorights discussions. The most pressing issues identified were protecting brain data privacy, combating bias in algorithms used in neurotechnology, and improving informed consent mechanisms for interventions with invasive neuroscientific techniques.
与神经伦理学所探讨的其他主题通常的情况一样,对神经权利进行严谨分析需要采用跨学科方法。为满足这一需求,并在神经权利监管举措全球扩展的背景下,我们在国际神经科学与伦理学中心(CINET)的支持下,协调开展了一门从神经科学角度介绍神经权利的课程。该课程面向来自不同背景(包括神经科学、心理学和法律等)的60名学生,为期10小时的培训展示了当前关于神经权利的方法和讨论,并从现实角度概述了用于记录、分析和操纵人类大脑活动的前沿技术。该课程成功消除了一些担忧,并发现了神经权利讨论中不常出现的其他问题。所确定的最紧迫问题是保护大脑数据隐私、对抗神经技术中使用的算法偏差,以及改进侵入性神经科学技术干预的知情同意机制。