• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于现实神经科学的多学科学生神经权利培训。

Neurorights Training of a Multidisciplinary Studentship Based on Realistic Neuroscience.

作者信息

Muñoz José M, Bernacer Javier

机构信息

International Center for Neuroscience and Ethics (CINET), Tatiana Foundation.

Institute of Neurotechnology and Law (INL).

出版信息

AJOB Neurosci. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):60-65. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2024.2424602. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1080/21507740.2024.2424602
PMID:39656200
Abstract

As is usually the case with other topics addressed by neuroethics, a rigorous analysis of neurorights requires an interdisciplinary approach. In response to this need and in the context of the global expansion of regulatory initiatives on neurorights, we coordinated, under the auspices of the International Center for Neuroscience and Ethics (CINET), an introductory course on neurorights from a neuroscientific perspective. The course, aimed at sixty students from diverse backgrounds (neuroscience, psychology, and law, among others), consisted of a 10-hr training that showed the current approaches and discussions on neurorights and outlined cutting-edge technologies to register, analyze, and manipulate human brain activity from a realistic stance. The course succeeded in discarding some concerns and uncovering others not frequently found in the neurorights discussions. The most pressing issues identified were protecting brain data privacy, combating bias in algorithms used in neurotechnology, and improving informed consent mechanisms for interventions with invasive neuroscientific techniques.

摘要

与神经伦理学所探讨的其他主题通常的情况一样,对神经权利进行严谨分析需要采用跨学科方法。为满足这一需求,并在神经权利监管举措全球扩展的背景下,我们在国际神经科学与伦理学中心(CINET)的支持下,协调开展了一门从神经科学角度介绍神经权利的课程。该课程面向来自不同背景(包括神经科学、心理学和法律等)的60名学生,为期10小时的培训展示了当前关于神经权利的方法和讨论,并从现实角度概述了用于记录、分析和操纵人类大脑活动的前沿技术。该课程成功消除了一些担忧,并发现了神经权利讨论中不常出现的其他问题。所确定的最紧迫问题是保护大脑数据隐私、对抗神经技术中使用的算法偏差,以及改进侵入性神经科学技术干预的知情同意机制。

相似文献

1
Neurorights Training of a Multidisciplinary Studentship Based on Realistic Neuroscience.基于现实神经科学的多学科学生神经权利培训。
AJOB Neurosci. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):60-65. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2024.2424602. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Neurorights in the Constitution: from neurotechnology to ethics and politics.宪法中的神经权利:从神经技术到伦理与政治。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Dec 2;379(1915):20230098. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0098. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
3
Contextual and Cultural Perspectives on Neurorights: Reflections Toward an International Consensus.神经权利的语境和文化视角:对国际共识的思考。
AJOB Neurosci. 2023 Oct-Dec;14(4):360-368. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2022.2048722. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
4
On Neurorights.论神经权利。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 24;15:701258. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.701258. eCollection 2021.
5
Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of 'Neurorights'.关注权利:勾勒“神经权利”的伦理与法律基础
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2023 May 15:1-21. doi: 10.1017/S0963180123000245.
6
Neurorights: The Debate About New Legal Safeguards to Protect the Mind.神经权利:关于保护心智的新型法律保障措施的辩论。
Issues Law Med. 2022 Spring;37(1):95-114.
7
A Critical Perspective on NeuroRights: Comments Regarding Ethics and Law.对神经权利的批判性视角:关于伦理与法律的评论
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 25;15:703121. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.703121. eCollection 2021.
8
The way forward for neuroethics in Japan: A review of five topics surrounding present challenges.日本神经伦理学的发展方向:对五个当前挑战相关主题的综述。
Neurosci Res. 2022 Oct;183:7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
9
On pharmacological neuroenhancement as part of the new neurorights' pioneering legislation in Chile: a perspective.关于智利新的神经权利开创性立法中的药理学神经增强:一种观点。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 18;14:1177720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177720. eCollection 2023.
10
[Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].[法庭上的神经科学:从责任到危险性,法国新法律引发的伦理问题]
Encephale. 2015 Oct;41(5):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 27.