Ligthart Sjors, Ienca Marcello, Meynen Gerben, Molnar-Gabor Fruzsina, Andorno Roberto, Bublitz Christoph, Catley Paul, Claydon Lisa, Douglas Thomas, Farahany Nita, Fins Joseph J, Goering Sara, Haselager Pim, Jotterand Fabrice, Lavazza Andrea, McCay Allan, Wajnerman Paz Abel, Rainey Stephen, Ryberg Jesper, Kellmeyer Philipp
Willem Pompe Institute for Criminal Law and Criminology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Denmark; Department of Criminal Law, Tilburg University, Tilberg, The Netherlands.
School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany & College of Humanities, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2023 May 15:1-21. doi: 10.1017/S0963180123000245.
The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty - often framed as "neurorights" in ethical, legal, and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including neurorights into their constitutional legal frameworks, and international institutions and organizations, such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe, are taking an active interest in developing international policy and governance guidelines on this issue. However, in many discussions of neurorights the philosophical assumptions, ethical frames of reference and legal interpretation are either not made explicit or conflict with each other. The aim of this multidisciplinary work is to provide conceptual, ethical, and legal foundations that allow for facilitating a common minimalist conceptual understanding of mental privacy, mental integrity, and cognitive liberty to facilitate scholarly, legal, and policy discussions.
神经技术的兴起，尤其是与基于人工智能（AI）的脑数据分析方法相结合，引发了人们对精神隐私、精神完整性和认知自由保护的担忧——在伦理、法律和政策讨论中，这些通常被称为“神经权利”。目前，一些国家正在考虑将神经权利纳入其宪法法律框架，而诸如联合国教科文组织和欧洲委员会等国际机构和组织，也积极关注制定关于这一问题的国际政策和治理准则。然而，在许多关于神经权利的讨论中，哲学假设、伦理参照框架和法律解释要么没有明确阐述，要么相互冲突。这项多学科研究的目的是提供概念、伦理和法律基础，以便促成对精神隐私、精神完整性和认知自由的一种共同的最低限度概念理解，从而推动学术、法律和政策讨论。
