Roerink Anne M C, Nelissen Rob G H H, Holder Carl, Graves Stephen E, Dunbar Michael, Bohm Eric, Grimberg Alexander W, Steinbrück Arnd, Dale Håvard, Fenstad Anne Marie, Blom Ashley W, Lenguerrand Erik, Frampton Christopher, Willems Tine, Victor Jan, Espallargues Mireia, Arias-de la Torre Jorge, Ciminello Enrico, Torre Marina, Pijls Bart G
Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.
Acta Orthop. 2024 Dec 10;95:730-736. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42183.
We aimed to determine sex differences for periprosthetic joint infections after primary arthroplasty of the hip, knee, ankle, and shoulder in osteoarthritis patients in an international perspective.
This is a multinational combined arthroplasty registry study. Each arthroplasty registry performed Cox-regression analysis of their data and reported the crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with an a priori designed data form. A random-effects model was used to pool these HRs to estimate an overall HR with 95% confidence interval (CI). Adjustment was undertaken for patient age, BMI, ASA grade, type of fixation, and type of implant. 9 arthroplasty registries participated. Patients who received primary total joint arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis were considered: 2,134,313 hip arthroplasties, 2,658,237 knee arthroplasties, 57,889 shoulder arthroplasties, and 8,445 ankle arthroplasties. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) for the overall risk of complete revision due to infection for each implant type and follow-up.
The pooled HR for revision due to infection for men compared with women at 1-year follow-up was 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-1.80) for hip arthroplasties; 2.06 (CI 1.90-2.46) for knee arthroplasties; 4.51 (CI 2.99-6.80) for shoulder arthroplasties; and 0.87 (CI 0.46-1.62) for ankle arthroplasties. These results remained consistent over time and were identified in both unadjusted and adjusted models.
Men have a higher risk of revision due to infection than women after primary hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty. No evidence of difference was found for ankle arthroplasty. These elevated relative risks persist in the fully adjusted investigations and over the 10-year postoperative period studied.
我们旨在从国际视角确定骨关节炎患者行髋、膝、踝和肩关节初次置换术后假体周围感染的性别差异。
这是一项多国联合关节置换登记研究。每个关节置换登记处对其数据进行Cox回归分析,并通过预先设计的数据表报告粗危险比和调整后的危险比(HR)。采用随机效应模型汇总这些HR,以估计总体HR及95%置信区间(CI)。对患者年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、固定类型和植入物类型进行了调整。9个关节置换登记处参与了研究。纳入因原发性骨关节炎接受初次全关节置换的患者:2134313例髋关节置换、2658237例膝关节置换、57889例肩关节置换和8445例踝关节置换。我们计算了每种植入物类型和随访时因感染导致完全翻修的总体风险的危险比(HR)。
在1年随访时,髋关节置换男性因感染翻修的汇总HR与女性相比为1.60(95%置信区间[CI]1.42 - 1.80);膝关节置换为2.06(CI 1.90 - 2.46);肩关节置换为4.51(CI 2.99 - 6.80);踝关节置换为0.87(CI 0.46 - 1.62)。这些结果随时间保持一致,在未调整和调整模型中均得到确认。
初次髋、膝和肩关节置换术后,男性因感染翻修的风险高于女性。踝关节置换未发现差异证据。这些升高的相对风险在完全调整后的研究以及长达10年术后随访期内持续存在。