• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯性急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术中缝线缝合与Hem-O-lok闭合技术的比较分析:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究

Comparative analysis of suture-based and Hem-O-lok closure techniques in laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a retrospective propensity score matching study.

作者信息

Liang Xian-Wen, Deng Kun, Liu Bing, Wang Shengzhong, Pan Tao

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University), Haikou, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine Affiliated Haikou Hospital, Haikou, China.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Dec 10;29(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03045-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-024-03045-8
PMID:39656266
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal method for appendix stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) remains debated. This study aims to evaluate the impact of suture-based closure and Hem-O-lok techniques on postoperative complications following LA for uncomplicated appendicitis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with uncomplicated appendicitis treated by LA from January 2019 to December 2021. These patients were categorized into two groups: the suture-based closure group (223 cases) and the Hem-O-lok group (272 cases). Propensity score matching addressed potential discrepancies between the groups. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters of both groups were then compared.

RESULTS

Post-matching, the operative duration in the suture-based group was longer than in the Hem-O-lok group (45.9 ± 9.7 min versus 42.8 ± 8.9 min, P = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses and fluid collections was significantly lower in the suture-based closure group (P = 0.032). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the Hem-O-lok clamp technique [odds ratio (OR) = 5.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-64.25, P = 0.047] was a notable risk factor for intra-abdominal abscesses and fluid collections.

CONCLUSIONS

The suture-based closure technique significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses and fluid collections compared with the Hem-O-lok technique in patients undergoing LA for uncomplicated appendicitis.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)中阑尾残端闭合的最佳方法仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估缝线闭合和Hem - O - lok技术对单纯性阑尾炎LA术后并发症的影响。

方法

对2019年1月至2021年12月接受LA治疗的单纯性阑尾炎患者进行回顾性分析。这些患者分为两组:缝线闭合组(223例)和Hem - O - lok组(272例)。倾向评分匹配解决了两组之间的潜在差异。然后比较两组的术中及术后参数。

结果

匹配后,缝线闭合组的手术时间长于Hem - O - lok组(45.9 ± 9.7分钟对42.8 ± 8.9分钟,P = 0.001)。缝线闭合组术后腹腔内脓肿和积液的发生率显著较低(P = 0.032)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,Hem - O - lok夹闭技术[比值比(OR)= 5.69,95%置信区间(CI):1.01 - 64.25,P = 0.047]是腹腔内脓肿和积液的一个显著危险因素。

结论

在接受LA治疗的单纯性阑尾炎患者中,与Hem - O - lok技术相比,缝线闭合技术显著降低了术后腹腔内脓肿和积液的发生率。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of suture-based and Hem-O-lok closure techniques in laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a retrospective propensity score matching study.单纯性急性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术中缝线缝合与Hem-O-lok闭合技术的比较分析:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Dec 10;29(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03045-8.
2
Appendiceal stump closure using polymeric clips reduces intra-abdominal abscesses.使用聚合物夹闭合阑尾残端可减少腹腔内脓肿。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Aug;401(5):661-6. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1459-3. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
3
The influence of the different forms of appendix base closure on patient outcome in laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized trial.不同形式的阑尾根部闭合方式对腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者结局的影响:一项随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2295-2299. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5924-z. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
4
Comparison of Stump Closure Methods in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Hem-o-Lok Clip and Laparoscopic Titanium Clip.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中残端闭合方法的比较:Hem-o-Lok夹与腹腔镜钛夹
JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00029. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
5
Handmade Loop Versus Hem-o-Lok Clip in Closure of Appendiceal Stump During Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Limited Setting in a Peripheral University Hospital.手工环扎与Hem-o-Lok 夹在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端闭合的比较:在一家边缘大学医院的有限环境下。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Sep;34(9):822-828. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0132. Epub 2024 May 21.
6
Hand-made Extracorporeal Knotting versus Hem-o-Lok Clip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中手工体外打结与Hem-o-Lok夹用于残端闭合的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019 Dec;29(12):1203-1206. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.12.1203.
7
Comparison of three different methods for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy: Endoloop, Hem-o-lok clip, and endostapler.比较三种不同方法在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中关闭残端:Endoloop、Hem-o-lok 夹和内镜吻合器。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Nov;30(11):795-801. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.76353.
8
Laparoscopic appendectomy: Hem-o-lok versus Endoloop in stump closure.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:残端闭合中Hem-o-lok与Endoloop的比较。
Updates Surg. 2017 Mar;69(1):61-65. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0413-9. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
9
Two different methods for appendiceal stump closure: metal clip and Hem-o-lok clip.两种不同的阑尾残端闭合方法:金属夹和Hem-o-lok夹。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Aug;24(8):571-3. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0543. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
10
Laparoscopic Procedure is Not Independently Associated With the Development of Intra-Abdominal Abscess After Appendectomy: A Multicenter Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching Analysis.腹腔镜手术与阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿的发生无独立相关性:一项倾向评分匹配分析的多中心队列研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):409-414. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000460.

本文引用的文献

1
Application and curative effect of laparoscopic purse-string sutures in the treatment of adult acute complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜荷包缝合术在成人急性复杂性阑尾炎治疗中的应用及疗效。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jan 4;23(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01884-6.
2
A randomized clinical trial of technical modifications of appendix stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎时阑尾残端闭合技术改良的随机临床试验
BMC Surg. 2021 May 31;21(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01279-z.
3
Is the use of endoloops safe and efficient for the closure of the appendicular stump in complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis?
在复杂和不复杂的急性阑尾炎中,使用 Endoloops 闭合阑尾残端是否安全有效?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Aug;406(5):1581-1589. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02050-3. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
4
Early detection of infectious complications using C-reactive protein and the procalcitonin levels after laparoscopic colorectal resection: a prospective cohort study.腹腔镜结直肠切除术后使用 C 反应蛋白和降钙素原水平早期检测感染性并发症:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Surg Today. 2021 Mar;51(3):397-403. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02111-6. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
6
The influence of the different forms of appendix base closure on patient outcome in laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized trial.不同形式的阑尾根部闭合方式对腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者结局的影响:一项随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2295-2299. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5924-z. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Implications of Lymph Node Staging on Selection of Adjuvant Therapy for Gastric Cancer in the United States: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.美国淋巴结分期对胃癌辅助治疗选择的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):298-305. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001360.
8
Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores.构建和评估倾向得分的方法。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct;49(5):1701-20. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12182. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Prognostic significance of complications after curative surgery for gastric cancer.胃癌根治术后并发症的预后意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;21(3):891-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3384-9. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
10
Are open abdominal procedures a thing of the past? An analysis of graduating general surgery residents' case logs from 2000 to 2011.开放性腹部手术是否已成过去式?对 2000 年至 2011 年毕业的普通外科住院医师病例记录的分析。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;70(6):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.002.