Abe Hiroyuki, Kuwata Takeshi, Kushima Ryoji, Ushiku Tetsuo
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Gastric Cancer. 2025 Mar;28(2):294-300. doi: 10.1007/s10120-024-01571-w. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
Since HER2 and PD-L1 testing are key to selecting drugs for first-line treatments in advanced gastric cancer, evaluating differences in these tests among institutions is necessary to standardize treatment.
A questionnaire survey was conducted targeting institutions certified by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.
Responses were obtained from 155 institutions. Most institutions performed HER2 testing in-house, while PD-L1 tests were largely outsourced. HER2 scores and PD-L1 CPS rates showed greater variability across institutions than anticipated. In the pre-analytic phase, 10% neutral buffered formalin was commonly used, with fixation practices generally following guidelines. Overall, the impact of fixation-related factors was limited, but in surgical specimens, longer fixation was associated with a higher proportion of score 0/1+ and a lower proportion of score 3+. When examining HER2 scores by institution, if a particular score had a high (or low) frequency in biopsy, the same trend was also seen in surgical specimens.
These findings suggest that not only factors related to specimen preparation, but also biases in evaluation criteria among pathologists may contribute to the significant variability among institutions. Standardization of pre- and post-analytic phases, coupled with appropriate training, is essential to achieve consistent gastric cancer therapy.
由于人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)和程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)检测是晚期胃癌一线治疗药物选择的关键,评估各机构在这些检测方面的差异对于规范治疗很有必要。
针对日本胃癌协会认证的机构进行了问卷调查。
共收到155家机构的回复。大多数机构自行开展HER2检测,而PD-L1检测大多外包。HER2评分和PD-L1联合阳性评分(CPS)率在各机构间的变异性比预期更大。在分析前阶段,常用10%中性缓冲福尔马林,固定方法总体遵循指南。总体而言,固定相关因素的影响有限,但在手术标本中,固定时间越长,0/1+评分的比例越高,3+评分的比例越低。按机构检查HER2评分时,如果某一特定评分在活检中的频率较高(或较低),在手术标本中也会出现相同趋势。
这些发现表明,不仅标本制备相关因素,而且病理学家评估标准的偏差可能导致各机构间存在显著变异性。分析前和分析后阶段的标准化,再加上适当的培训,对于实现一致的胃癌治疗至关重要。