Kaur Gurpreet, Morton Thayer, Khairy Marjon, Foy Megan, Gardner-Gray Jayna
Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, USA.
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2024 Dec 10;27(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11906-024-01321-4.
Extremes of blood pressure (BP) are common among patients that visit emergency departments. In this review article, we discuss the specific indications for invasive blood pressure monitoring in the ED, particularly in the context of undifferentiated shock and hypertensive emergencies.
In most cases, non-invasive techniques suffice for blood pressure monitoring, however, in certain patient presentations intermittent automated oscillometry bears significant drawbacks. The most evident drawback is the extended intervals between measurements. Invasive BP (IBP) monitoring offers a pivotal tool for patients with critical illness who require accurate, timely, blood pressure monitoring and indirectly monitors for complications involving vital organ systems. In the management of patients with critical illness or at risk for end organ injury, invasive methods that directly measure BP via arterial cannulation continues to be an established standard. Overall, evaluating patients on an individual basis, with the understanding that patients who present with extreme blood pressure values need closer monitoring, should prompt consideration of invasive methods of blood pressure monitoring.
血压(BP)异常在急诊科患者中很常见。在这篇综述文章中,我们讨论了急诊科有创血压监测的具体指征,特别是在未分化休克和高血压急症的情况下。
在大多数情况下,无创技术足以进行血压监测,然而,在某些患者表现中,间歇性自动振荡法存在显著缺点。最明显的缺点是测量间隔时间长。有创血压(IBP)监测为需要准确、及时进行血压监测的危重病患者提供了一个关键工具,并间接监测涉及重要器官系统的并发症。在危重病患者或有终末器官损伤风险的患者管理中,通过动脉置管直接测量血压的有创方法仍然是既定标准。总体而言,在对患者进行个体评估时,要明白血压值异常的患者需要更密切的监测,这应促使考虑采用有创血压监测方法。