• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Most patients with non-hypertensive diseases at a critical care resuscitation unit require arterial pressure monitoring: a prospective observational study.重症监护复苏病房中大多数非高血压疾病患者需要进行动脉压监测:一项前瞻性观察研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2023;14(3):173-178. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.035.
2
Discrepancy Between Invasive and Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements in Patients with Sepsis by Vasopressor Status.血管加压素状态对脓毒症患者有创与无创血压测量值的差异。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 May 5;23(3):358-367. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.1.53211.
3
Arterial or cuff pressure: Clinical predictors among patients in shock in a critical care resuscitation unit.动脉压或袖带压:重症监护复苏单元中休克患者的临床预测指标。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
4
Arterial blood pressure monitoring in overweight critically ill patients: invasive or noninvasive?超重危重症患者的动脉血压监测:有创还是无创?
Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R64. doi: 10.1186/cc4896.
5
Predictors of clinically relevant differences between noninvasive versus arterial blood pressure.预测无创与动脉血压之间具有临床意义差异的因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:170-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.044. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
6
Comparison of Noninvasive Oscillometric and Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Measurements in Children Admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.儿科重症监护病房收治儿童的无创示波法与有创动脉血压测量的比较
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2021 Nov 16;13(2):155-161. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739264. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Arterial Pressure Monitoring in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: An Observational Study Comparing Invasive and Non-invasive Measurements.心脏手术患儿的动脉压监测:一项比较有创和无创测量的观察性研究
Pediatr Cardiol. 2019 Aug;40(6):1231-1237. doi: 10.1007/s00246-019-02137-9. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
Accuracy in Blood Pressure Monitoring: The Effect of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Cuff Inflation on Intra-arterial Blood Pressure Values.血压监测的准确性:无创血压袖带充气对动脉内血压值的影响。
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):169-173. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.181430.
9
Invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring may aid in the medical management of hypertensive patients with acute aortic disease.有创动脉血压监测可能有助于急性主动脉疾病合并高血压患者的医疗管理。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;59:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.054. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
10
Comparison of Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring vs. Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Preterm Infants < 37 Weeks in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit- A Prospective Observational Study.在新生儿重症监护病房中,比较<37 周早产儿的有创动脉血压监测与无创血压监测:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Trop Pediatr. 2021 Dec 8;67(6). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab109.

引用本文的文献

1
Invasive Arterial BP Measurements in the Emergency Department-When, if Ever, is it Indicated?急诊科有创动脉血压测量——何时(如果有必要的话)需要进行?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2024 Dec 10;27(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11906-024-01321-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Arterial or cuff pressure: Clinical predictors among patients in shock in a critical care resuscitation unit.动脉压或袖带压:重症监护复苏单元中休克患者的临床预测指标。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Timing of norepinephrine initiation in patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脓毒性休克患者去甲肾上腺素起始时机:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Aug 6;24(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03204-x.
3
Blood pressure measurement in patients with cardiogenic shock: the effect of norepinephrine.心源性休克患者的血压测量:去甲肾上腺素的作用
Blood Press Monit. 2019 Oct;24(5):213-220. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000393.
4
Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure monitoring with invasive arterial pressure monitoring in medical ICU patients with septic shock.医学重症监护病房感染性休克患者无创血压监测与有创动脉压监测的比较。
Blood Press Monit. 2017 Aug;22(4):202-207. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000258.
5
The association between lactate, mean arterial pressure, central venous oxygen saturation and peripheral temperature and mortality in severe sepsis: a retrospective cohort analysis.乳酸、平均动脉压、中心静脉血氧饱和度及外周温度与严重脓毒症患者死亡率的相关性:一项回顾性队列分析
Crit Care. 2016 Mar 12;20:56. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1243-3.
6
Association between arterial catheter use and hospital mortality in intensive care units.动脉导管使用与重症监护病房医院死亡率的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Nov;174(11):1746-54. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3297.
7
Arterial catheters as a source of bloodstream infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.动脉导管作为血流感染源:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1334-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000166.
8
Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension.非心脏手术后术中平均动脉压与临床结局的关系:低血压的实证定义。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Sep;119(3):507-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a10e26.
9
Effect of norepinephrine dosage and calibration frequency on accuracy of pulse contour-derived cardiac output.去甲肾上腺素剂量和校准频率对脉搏轮廓心输出量测量准确性的影响。
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R22. doi: 10.1186/cc9967. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
10
Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.超急性卒中患者无创示波法与有创动脉血压测量的比较
Blood Press Monit. 2007 Jun;12(3):149-56. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3280b083e2.

重症监护复苏病房中大多数非高血压疾病患者需要进行动脉压监测:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Most patients with non-hypertensive diseases at a critical care resuscitation unit require arterial pressure monitoring: a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Engelbrecht-Wiggans Emily, Palmer Jamie, Hollis Grace, Albelo Fernando, Ali Afrah, Hart Emily, Gelmann Dominique, Sahadzic Iana, Gerding James, Tran Quincy K, Haase Daniel J

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.

The Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.

出版信息

World J Emerg Med. 2023;14(3):173-178. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.035.

DOI:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.035
PMID:37152525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10156524/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) monitoring is essential for patient care. Invasive arterial BP (IABP) is more accurate than non-invasive BP (NIBP), although the clinical significance of this difference is unknown. We hypothesized that IABP would result in a change of management (COM) among patients with non-hypertensive diseases in the acute phase of resuscitation.

METHODS

This prospective study included adults admitted to the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit (CCRU) with non-hypertensive disease from February 1, 2019, to May 31, 2021. Management plans to maintain a mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) were recorded in real time for both NIBP and IABP measurements. A COM was defined as a discrepancy between IABP and NIBP that resulted in an increase/decrease or addition/discontinuation of a medication/infusion. Classification and regression tree analysis identified significant variables associated with a COM and assigned relative variable importance (RVI) values.

RESULTS

Among the 206 patients analyzed, a COM occurred in 94 (45.6% [94/206]) patients. The most common COM was an increase in current infusion dosages (40 patients, 19.4%). Patients receiving norepinephrine at arterial cannulation were more likely to have a COM compared with those without (45 [47.9%] vs. 32 [28.6%], =0.004). Receiving norepinephrine (relative variable importance [RVI] 100%) was the most significant factor associated with a COM. No complications were identified with IABP use.

CONCLUSION

A COM occurred in 94 (45.6%) non-hypertensive patients in the CCRU. Receiving vasopressors was the greatest factor associated with COM. Clinicians should consider IABP monitoring more often in non-hypertensive patients requiring norepinephrine in the acute resuscitation phase. Further studies are necessary to confirm the risk-to-benefit ratios of IABP among these high-risk patients.

摘要

背景

血压(BP)监测对患者护理至关重要。有创动脉血压(IABP)比无创血压(NIBP)更准确,尽管这种差异的临床意义尚不清楚。我们假设IABP会导致复苏急性期非高血压疾病患者的管理改变(COM)。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了2019年2月1日至2021年5月31日入住重症监护复苏病房(CCRU)的非高血压疾病成人患者。实时记录针对NIBP和IABP测量维持平均动脉压>65 mmHg(1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa)的管理计划。COM定义为IABP和NIBP之间的差异,导致药物/输注的增加/减少或添加/停用。分类和回归树分析确定了与COM相关的显著变量,并赋予相对变量重要性(RVI)值。

结果

在分析的206例患者中,94例(45.6%[94/206])出现了COM。最常见的COM是当前输注剂量增加(40例患者,19.4%)。与未在动脉置管时接受去甲肾上腺素的患者相比,接受去甲肾上腺素的患者更有可能出现COM(45例[47.9%]对32例[28.6%],P = 0.004)。接受去甲肾上腺素(相对变量重要性[RVI]100%)是与COM相关的最显著因素。未发现使用IABP有并发症。

结论

CCRU中94例(45.6%)非高血压患者出现了COM。接受血管加压药是与COM相关的最大因素。临床医生在急性复苏阶段需要去甲肾上腺素的非高血压患者中应更频繁地考虑IABP监测。有必要进行进一步研究以确认这些高危患者中IABP的风险效益比。