Suppr超能文献

缺乏非流利型和语义变异型核心特征的原发性进行性失语:临床、神经影像学和神经病理学特征

Primary Progressive Aphasia Lacking Core Features of Nonfluent and Semantic Variants: Clinical, Neuroimaging, and Neuropathologic Features.

作者信息

Watanabe Hiroyuki, Duffy Joseph R, Clark Heather, Machulda Mary M, Graff-Radford Jonathan, Thu Pham Nha Trang, Dickson Dennis W, Lowe Val J, Whitwell Jennifer L, Josephs Keith A

机构信息

From the Departments of Neurology (H.W., J.R.D., H.C., J.G.-R., K.A.J.), Psychology (M.M.M.), and Radiology (N.T.T.P., V.J.L., J.L.W.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neuroscience (Neuropathology) (D.W.D.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.

出版信息

Neurology. 2024 Nov 12;103(9):e209924. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209924. Epub 2024 Oct 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Evidence has accumulated that the 2011 consensus criteria for primary progressive aphasia (PPA) do not fully capture features of logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA/LPA). We aimed to examine clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropathologic features of PPA lacking features of nonfluent/semantic variants and to provide practical additions to the 2011 consensus criteria.

METHODS

This was a retrospective examination of data from 2 observational cohort studies where patients with PPA were prospectively recruited at Mayo Clinic. Based on performance on 2 cardinal features (repetition and comprehension), patients were classified as: pure-LPA (poor repetition, acceptable comprehension), Wernicke-like (poor in both), anomic-like (acceptable in both), and transcortical sensory aphasia-like (TCSA-like) (acceptable repetition, poor comprehension).

RESULTS

The entire cohort consisted of 102 patients with PPA lacking features of nonfluent/semantic variants (median age at onset 63.5 years, 56% female). Thirty-one patients were followed up at 1 year. Twenty-three patients were included in a neuropathologic cohort. The proportion of repetition-preserved PPA (anomic-like and TCSA-like) was more than double that of repetition-impaired PPA (pure-LPA and Wernicke-like) (73% vs 27%). Regarding clinical course, the anomic-like subgroup was a prodromal state of the pure-LPA or TCSA-like subgroup, whereas the pure-LPA and TCSA-like subgroups were a prodromal state of the Wernicke-like subgroup. There was left temporoparietal atrophy on MRI and/or hypometabolism on F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in all groups. Furthermore, repetition-impaired PPA showed severe hypometabolism in the left superior temporal lobe associated with repetition ability. Regarding pathologic diagnoses, 70% had Alzheimer disease (AD). The pure-LPA, Wernicke-like, and TCSA-like subgroups all showed AD pathology. Only 53% of the anomic-like subgroup had AD. The remaining 47% showed Pick disease (7%), frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43-immunoreactive pathology (20%), and Lewy body disease (20%).

DISCUSSION

This observed clinical heterogeneity reflects different time points/severities of the same disease process and hence can be reconceptualized as an AD-related aphasia spectrum, incorporating lvPPA and the 4 subgroups (pure-LPA, Wernicke-like, anomic-like, and TCSA-like). Specifying moderate/severe repetition deficits as a core feature of lvPPA in the 2011 consensus criteria can enhance its pathologic correlations. Recognizing progressive anomic aphasia (anomic-like) as an additional PPA variant could lessen pathologic heterogeneity of lvPPA.

摘要

背景与目的

已有证据表明,2011年原发性进行性失语(PPA)的共识标准未能充分涵盖言语流畅性变异型PPA(lvPPA/LPA)的特征。我们旨在研究缺乏非流畅型/语义变异型特征的PPA的临床、神经影像学和神经病理学特征,并为2011年共识标准提供实用的补充内容。

方法

这是一项对2项观察性队列研究数据的回顾性分析,研究中在梅奥诊所前瞻性招募了PPA患者。根据两项主要特征(复述和理解)的表现,患者被分为:纯LPA型(复述差,理解尚可)、韦尼克样型(两者均差)、命名性失语样型(两者均尚可)和经皮质感觉性失语样型(TCSA样型)(复述尚可,理解差)。

结果

整个队列由102例缺乏非流畅型/语义变异型特征的PPA患者组成(发病年龄中位数为63.5岁,56%为女性)。31例患者进行了1年的随访。23例患者纳入神经病理学队列。复述保留的PPA(命名性失语样型和TCSA样型)的比例是复述受损的PPA(纯LPA型和韦尼克样型)的两倍多(73%对27%)。关于临床病程,命名性失语样型亚组是纯LPA型或TCSA样型亚组的前驱状态,而纯LPA型和TCSA样型亚组是韦尼克样型亚组的前驱状态。所有组在MRI上均有左侧颞顶叶萎缩和/或在F-氟脱氧葡萄糖-PET上有代谢减低。此外,复述受损的PPA在左侧颞上叶表现出与复述能力相关的严重代谢减低。关于病理诊断,70%患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)。纯LPA型、韦尼克样型和TCSA样型亚组均显示AD病理改变。命名性失语样型亚组只有53%患有AD。其余47%表现为皮克病(7%)、伴有TDP-43免疫反应性病理改变的额颞叶变性(20%)和路易体病(20%)。

讨论

观察到的这种临床异质性反映了同一疾病过程的不同时间点/严重程度,因此可以重新概念化为一种与AD相关的失语谱系,纳入lvPPA和4个亚组(纯LPA型、韦尼克样型、命名性失语样型和TCSA样型)。在2011年共识标准中将中度/重度复述缺陷指定为lvPPA的核心特征可以增强其与病理的相关性。将进行性命名性失语(命名性失语样型)识别为另一种PPA变异型可以减少lvPPA的病理异质性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
A New Framework for Dementia Nomenclature.痴呆症命名的新框架。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Dec 1;80(12):1364-1370. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3664.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验