Podversich Federico, Abdelhadi Leandro, Roskopf Sergio, Silva Gleise M, Angeli Emmanuel, Hein Gustavo J, Ortega Hugo H, Ruiz-Moreno Martin, Dubeux Jose C B, DiLorenzo Nicolas
North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.
Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae369.
Two experiments were conducted to assess the effects of feeding whole-plant sorghum silage (WPSS) with different kernel processing techniques (KP). Experiment 1 contrasted KP for WPSS on intake and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) in beef heifers (n = 24, 13 ± 1 mo, 267 ± 10.9 kg of initial body weight [BW]) housed in individual pens (36 m2). Grain sorghum was harvested at hard dough, switching the kernel processor to obtain the WPSS treatments: A) unprocessed (UNP), B) conventionally processed (CONV), and C) shredlage processed (SHRD). Heifers (8/treatment) received ad libitum WPSS from their respective treatment, plus soybean meal top-dressed at 0.5% BW/d (DM basis). Feed, and feces were collected for 5 d; feed was offered once daily, and orts were collected the following day. Fecal samples were collected twice daily, and ATTD was determined using indigestible neutral detergent fiber (NDF) as a marker. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized design, with heifer as the experimental unit, and the following contrasts were performed 1) Processing: UNP vs. (CONV + SHRD) and 2) Processor: CONV vs. SHRD. Processing WPSS increased the ATTD of starch by 4.5% (P = 0.01), reduced fecal starch by 27.5% (P = 0.01), and reduced the change of NDF from feed to orts by 39% (P < 0.01). Heifers fed SHRD had 6.6% greater ATTD of NDF than CONV-fed heifers (P = 0.04). Experiment 2 evaluated the effects of feeding either SHRD or CONV-processed WPSS on growth performance of beef heifers. Whole-plant grain sorghum was harvested at the hard-dough stage, switching the KP as in experiment 1. Angus heifers (n = 96, 15 ± 1 mo, 249.6 ± 28.6 kg of BW) were blocked by initial BW, and randomly assigned to pens (8 heifers/pen, 6 pens/treatment). Diets consisted, all on a DM basis, of WPSS, either SHRD or CONV, at 90.5%, expeller soybean meal at 7.0%, and a vitamin-mineral-protein concentrate at 2.5%. After 14-d of adaptation, growth was measured for 56 d, and feed was offered once daily. Data were analyzed using a randomized complete block design with the pen as the experimental unit. Heifers fed CONV had a 9.6% greater gain-to-feed ratio (P = 0.05) and a 7.4% greater Kleiber ratio (P = 0.05) than SHRD-fed heifers. Apparent net energy of gain tended to be 7.1% greater in CONV-fed heifers (P = 0.06). In conclusion, kernel processing WPSS increased starch digestibility and reduced fecal starch concentration. Using SHRD increased NDF digestibility and feeding CONV-processed WPSS resulted in enhanced growth performance.
进行了两项试验,以评估采用不同籽粒加工技术(KP)的全株高粱青贮饲料(WPSS)的饲喂效果。试验1比较了WPSS不同籽粒加工技术对育肥牛(n = 24,13±1月龄,初始体重[BW]267±10.9千克)采食量和表观全肠道消化率(ATTD)的影响,牛单独饲养在个体栏舍(36平方米)中。高粱在硬粒期收获,更换籽粒加工设备以获得WPSS处理:A)未加工(UNP),B)常规加工(CONV),C)粉碎加工(SHRD)。每个处理8头育肥牛自由采食各自处理的WPSS,并按体重的0.5%(干物质基础)补饲豆粕。收集饲料和粪便5天;每天投喂一次饲料,第二天收集剩料。每天收集两次粪便样本,以不可消化中性洗涤纤维(NDF)作为标记物测定ATTD。数据采用完全随机设计进行分析,以育肥牛作为试验单位,并进行以下比较:1)加工方式:UNP对(CONV + SHRD);2)加工设备:CONV对SHRD。加工WPSS使淀粉的ATTD提高了4.5%(P = 0.01),粪便淀粉减少了27.5%(P = 0.01),饲料到剩料中NDF的变化减少了39%(P < 0.01)。采食SHRD的育肥牛NDF的ATTD比采食CONV的育肥牛高6.6%(P = 0.04)。试验2评估了饲喂SHRD或CONV加工的WPSS对育肥牛生长性能的影响。全株高粱在硬粒期收获,同试验1一样更换籽粒加工设备。安格斯育肥牛(n = 96,15±1月龄,体重249.6±28.6千克)按初始体重进行分组,随机分配到栏舍(每栏8头,每个处理6栏)。日粮均以干物质为基础,包括90.5%的WPSS(SHRD或CONV)、7.0%的压榨豆粕和2.5%的维生素-矿物质-蛋白质预混料。适应14天后,测定56天的生长性能,每天投喂一次饲料。数据采用随机完全区组设计进行分析,以栏舍作为试验单位。采食CONV的育肥牛的增重-饲料比比采食SHRD的育肥牛高9.6%(P = 0.05),克来伯比率高7.4%(P = 0.05)。采食CONV的育肥牛的表观净能增加量有比采食SHRD的育肥牛高7.1%的趋势(P = 0.06)。总之,籽粒加工WPSS提高了淀粉消化率,降低了粪便淀粉浓度。采用SHRD提高了NDF消化率,饲喂CONV加工的WPSS提高了生长性能。