Howe Edmund G
Professor of Psychiatry, Professor of Medicine, Vice Chair, Ethics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Senior Scientist, Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress (CSFS), Uniformed University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Mil Med. 2025 Feb 27;190(3-4):474-478. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae544.
The first class at USUHS took its initial course in medical ethics in 1977. I directed this course until recently when COVID first emerged. In this piece, I review what these students were taught during the last 5 of 8 class sessions involving the military, genetic, reproduction, student ethics, and the Holocaust. I discuss here the content of these sessions, the rationales of these contents, key lessons learned, and future directions and challenges. This review provides readers with information regarding some of the faculty brought in to provide these lectures, and key points they emphasized. It also summarizes the more subtle points regarding ethics that it was hoped students would gain and use throughout their medical careers and lifetimes.
This review focuses particularly on core military medial ethical issues that were posed by others writing on this subject and accordingly introduced to students in this course. It also highlights key cultural considerations introduced in both genetics and reproduction. It finally emphasizes core concepts that students were introduced to prior to their entering the clinical wards. In all these classes, the initial presentations were designed primarily to prime or involve these students personally and emotionally in these issues so that they would want to address them in their discussion groups.
Students achieved a grounding in leading and representative ethical conflicts arising in major medical fields. These included their considering military physicians different roles, limitations genetics might pose in certain roles, pregnant person/fetal conflicts, students facing the need to confront their teachers, and students' struggles to achieve the highest moral standards they could.
Medical ethics is now taught in all medical schools but at USUHS this education must include traditional core medical topics and military medical issues as well. A challenge posed throughout the course was whether to emphasize what ethical and professional behaviors would be expected of students in their later military careers or to challenge them to engage in original analysis of ethical questions that had no self-evident answers. The decision was made in most cases to encourage students having materials to discuss and debate in their discussion groups, especially since they would learn what was expected of them in their military roles from multiple other sources. The priming for these discussions in the presentations seemingly succeeded in engaging the students and in provoking relevant debate throughout all of these cases. This learning is highly important in that in the future in both medicine and the military new unanticipated ethical issues will continue to arise. Since there will be no self-evident best ethical answers to these issues, those tasked with and thus seeking to resolve them will have to depend on having the optimal ethical skills for approaching and resolving these issues. This course sought to initiate this process, engaging these students and moving them hopefully to want to increase their skills in analyzing ethical dilemmas as they continue to progress throughout their military careers.
美国卫生科学大学(USUHS)的第一堂课于1977年首次开设医学伦理学课程。直到最近新冠疫情首次出现之前,我一直负责这门课程。在这篇文章中,我回顾了在涉及军事、遗传学、生殖、学生伦理和大屠杀的8节课程中的最后5节里,这些学生所学的内容。我在此讨论这些课程的内容、这些内容的理论依据、学到的关键经验教训以及未来的方向和挑战。这篇综述为读者提供了有关一些受邀前来授课的教员的信息,以及他们所强调的要点。它还总结了关于伦理方面更微妙的要点,希望学生在整个医学职业生涯和人生中能够掌握并运用这些要点。
本综述特别关注其他撰写该主题的人提出的核心军事医学伦理问题,并因此在本课程中向学生介绍。它还强调了遗传学和生殖学中引入的关键文化考量因素。最后,它强调了学生在进入临床病房之前所学的核心概念。在所有这些课程中,最初的讲解主要是为了让这些学生在个人情感上参与到这些问题中,以便他们想要在讨论小组中探讨这些问题。
学生们对主要医学领域中出现的主要和具有代表性的伦理冲突有了一定的基础认识。这些冲突包括他们对军事医生不同角色的思考、遗传学在某些角色中可能带来的限制、孕妇/胎儿冲突、学生面临与教师对抗的必要性,以及学生努力达到他们所能达到的最高道德标准。
现在所有医学院校都教授医学伦理学,但在美国卫生科学大学,这种教育还必须包括传统的核心医学主题以及军事医学问题。在整个课程中提出的一个挑战是,是强调学生在未来军事生涯中应有的道德和职业行为,还是挑战他们对没有不言而喻答案的伦理问题进行原创性分析。在大多数情况下,决定鼓励学生在讨论小组中有材料可供讨论和辩论,特别是因为他们会从多个其他来源了解到他们在军事角色中所期望的行为。讲解中对这些讨论的引导似乎成功地让学生参与其中,并在所有这些案例中引发了相关的辩论。这种学习非常重要,因为在未来医学和军事领域都会不断出现新的意外伦理问题。由于对于这些问题没有不言而喻的最佳伦理答案,那些负责并因此试图解决这些问题的人将不得不依赖于拥有处理和解决这些问题的最佳伦理技能。本课程旨在启动这一过程,让这些学生参与进来,并希望推动他们在整个军事生涯中不断进步的过程中,想要提高自己分析伦理困境的技能。