Howe Edmund G
Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Mil Med. 2025 Jun 30;190(7-8):1386-1390. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae546.
The first class at USUHS took its initial course in medical ethics in 1977. I directed this course until recently when COVID first emerged. In this piece, I review what these students were taught during the first 3 of 8 class sessions involving children, end-of-life care, and research (the last 5 of these 8 sessions are discussed in a companion article). This review provides readers with information regarding some of the faculty brought in to provide these lectures, and key points they emphasized. It also summarizes the more subtle points regarding ethics that it was hoped students would gain and use throughout their medical careers and lifetimes.
This review focuses particularly on core military medial ethical issues that were posed by others writing on this subject and accordingly introduced to students in this course. It also highlights core concepts that students were introduced to prior to their entering the clinical wards. In all these classes, the initial presentations were designed primarily to prime or involve these students personally and emotionally in these issues so that they would want to address them in their discussion groups.
Students achieved a grounding in leading and representative ethical conflicts arising in major medical fields. These included their considering military physician different roles, limitations genetics might pose in certain roles, pregnant person/fetal conflicts, students facing the need to confront their teachers, and students' struggles to achieve the highest moral standards they could.
Medical ethics is now taught in all medical schools but at USUHS this education must include traditional core medical topics and military medical issues as well. A challenge posed throughout the course was whether to emphasize what ethical and professional behaviors would be expected of students in their later military careers or to challenge them to engage in original analysis of ethical questions that had no self-evident answers. The decision was made in most cases to encourage students to discuss and debate controversial issues in their discussion groups, especially since they would learn what was expected of them in their military roles from multiple other sources. The priming for these discussions in the presentations seemingly succeeded in engaging the students and in provoking relevant debate throughout all of these cases. This learning is highly important in that in the future in both medicine and the military new unanticipated ethical issues will continue to arise. Since there will be no self-evident best ethical answers to these issues, those tasked with and thus seeking to resolve them will have to depend on having the optimal ethical skills for approaching and resolving these issues. This course sought to initiate this process, engaging these students and moving them hopefully to want to increase their skills in analyzing ethical dilemmas as they continue to progress throughout their military careers.
美国卫生科学大学(USUHS)的第一堂课于1977年开设了医学伦理学的初始课程。直到最近新冠疫情首次出现之前,我一直负责这门课程。在这篇文章中,我回顾了在涉及儿童、临终关怀和研究的8节课程中的前3节里这些学生所学的内容(这8节课程中的后5节在一篇配套文章中讨论)。这篇回顾为读者提供了一些关于参与授课的教员以及他们所强调的要点的信息。它还总结了关于伦理学的一些更为微妙的要点,希望学生们在整个医学生涯及人生中都能掌握并运用这些要点。
这篇回顾特别关注其他撰写该主题的人所提出的核心军事医学伦理问题,并因此在本课程中向学生进行了介绍。它还突出了学生在进入临床病房之前所接触到的核心概念。在所有这些课程中,最初的授课主要旨在让这些学生在个人情感层面上参与到这些问题中,以便他们想要在讨论小组中探讨这些问题。
学生们对主要医学领域中出现的主要和具有代表性的伦理冲突有了一定的了解。这些冲突包括他们对军事医生不同角色的思考、遗传学在某些角色中可能带来的限制、孕妇/胎儿冲突、学生面临挑战老师的必要性,以及学生努力达到他们所能达到的最高道德标准。
现在所有医学院校都开设了医学伦理学课程,但在美国卫生科学大学,这种教育还必须包括传统的核心医学主题以及军事医学问题。贯穿整个课程的一个挑战是,是强调学生在其未来军事生涯中应具备的伦理和专业行为,还是促使他们对没有显而易见答案的伦理问题进行原创性分析。在大多数情况下,决定鼓励学生在讨论小组中讨论和辩论有争议的问题,特别是因为他们会从多个其他来源了解到在军事角色中对他们的期望。在授课中为这些讨论所做的铺垫似乎成功地让学生参与其中,并在所有这些案例中引发了相关的辩论。这种学习非常重要,因为在未来医学和军事领域都会不断出现新的、意想不到的伦理问题。由于对于这些问题没有显而易见的最佳伦理答案,那些负责并因此寻求解决这些问题的人将不得不依赖于具备处理和解决这些问题的最佳伦理技能。本课程旨在启动这一过程,让这些学生参与进来,并有望促使他们在整个军事生涯不断进步的过程中,想要提高自己分析伦理困境的技能。