Du Lian, Zeng Jinkun, Yu Hua, Chen Bijun, Deng Wei, Li Tao
Department of psychiatry, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China; Affiliated Mental Health Center & Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310013, China; Key Laboratory of Major Brain Disease and Aging Research (Ministry of Education) , Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Affiliated Mental Health Center & Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310013, China.
Psychiatry Res. 2025 Feb;344:116303. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116303. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
The efficacy of bright light therapy (BLT) in the context of perinatal depression remains underexplored. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the effectiveness of BLT among perinatal depression. A comprehensive literature search was performed across several databases, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, CNKI and the clinical trials registry platform, covering the period from the inception of each database up to January 2024. The Cochrane Collaboration's bias assessment tool was employed to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Review Manager 5.3 Software was utilized to conduct the meta-analysis. Six trials, encompassed a total of 167 participants diagnosed with perinatal depression were incorporated quantitative analysis, all of those have been published in English, with no restriction on publication year, and used BLT and dim light therapy (DLT) as intervention. The relative risk (RR) of BLT compared to DLT for perinatal depression is 1.46 (fixed effects model, p = 0.04, 95 % CI = [1.02, 2.10]), indicating a significant improvement in depression outcomes compared to DLT groups. The heterogeneity test yielded an I value of 41 % (p = 0.13), indicated a low degree of heterogeneity. Considering the small sample size, we conducted a sensitivity analysis, found RR increased to 2.33 (fixed effects model, p = 0.001, CI = 1.39-3.92). Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool showed only a single study was deemed high quality. This study indicates a beneficial impact of BLT on perinatal depression, subgroup analysis finds no significant mediation effects of different parameters after sensitivity analyses. It is recommended that future studies with larger samples be conducted to explore the effects of BLT on perinatal depression.
在围产期抑郁症背景下,强光疗法(BLT)的疗效仍未得到充分研究。本荟萃分析旨在系统评估围产期抑郁症患者接受BLT的有效性。通过多个数据库进行了全面的文献检索,包括Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、PubMed、Embase、中国知网和临床试验注册平台,涵盖各数据库创建至2024年1月期间的文献。采用Cochrane协作网的偏倚评估工具来评价纳入研究的质量。使用Review Manager 5.3软件进行荟萃分析。纳入定量分析的六项试验共有167名被诊断为围产期抑郁症的参与者,所有研究均以英文发表,对发表年份无限制,且采用BLT和暗光疗法(DLT)作为干预措施。与DLT相比,围产期抑郁症患者接受BLT的相对风险(RR)为1.46(固定效应模型,p = 0.04,95%CI = [1.02, 2.10]),表明与DLT组相比,抑郁结局有显著改善。异质性检验得出I值为41%(p = 0.13),表明异质性程度较低。考虑到样本量较小,我们进行了敏感性分析,发现RR增加至2.33(固定效应模型,p = 0.001,CI = 1.39 - 3.92)。Cochrane偏倚风险工具显示只有一项研究被认为质量高。本研究表明BLT对围产期抑郁症有有益影响,亚组分析发现敏感性分析后不同参数无显著中介效应。建议未来开展更大样本量的研究,以探索BLT对围产期抑郁症的影响。