Suppr超能文献

非季节性抑郁症的强光疗法:系统评价与荟萃分析

Bright Light Therapy for Nonseasonal Depressive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Menegaz de Almeida Artur, Aquino de Moraes Francisco Cezar, Cavalcanti Souza Maria Eduarda, Cavalcanti Orestes Cardoso Jorge Henrique, Tamashiro Fernanda, Miranda Celso, Fernandes Lilianne, Kreuz Michele, Alves Kelly Francinny

机构信息

Federal University of Mato Grosso, Sinop, Brazil.

Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 1;82(1):38-46. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2871.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Seasonal humor disorders are prone to have a link with daylight exposure. However, the effect of external light on nonseasonal disorders remains unclear. Evidence is lacking for the validity of bright light therapy (BLT) as an adjunctive treatment for these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess BLT effectiveness as an adjunctive treatment for nonseasonal depressive disorders.

DATA SOURCES

In March 2024, a comprehensive search was performed of publications in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating BLT effects in patients with nonseasonal depression.

STUDY SELECTION

RCTs published since 2000 were eligible. Comparisons between BLT and dim red light or antidepressant monotherapy alone were considered for inclusion.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Using the systematic review approach on RCTs published from January 1, 2000, through March 25, 2024, differences between patients treated with and without BLT were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel method; heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Remission of symptoms, response to treatment rates, and depression scales were assessed.

RESULTS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 unique trials with data from 858 patients (649 female [75.6%]), statistically significant better remission and response rates were found in the BLT group (remission: 40.7% vs 23.5%; odds ratio [OR], 2.42; 95% CI, 1.50-3.91; P <.001; I2 = 21%; response: 60.4% vs 38.6%; OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.46-3.75; P <.001; I2 = 41%). With BLT, subgroup analysis based on follow-up times also showed better remission (<4 weeks: 27.4% vs 9.2%; OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 1.45-8.88; P = .005; I2 = 0% and >4 weeks: 46.6% vs 29.1%; OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.19-4.00; P = .01; I2 = 47%) and response (<4 weeks: 55.6% vs 27.4%; OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.81-7.33; P <.001; I2 = 35% and >4 weeks: 63.0% vs 44.9%; OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.01-3.17; P = .04; I2 = 32%) rates.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that BLT was an effective adjunctive treatment for nonseasonal depressive disorders. Additionally, results suggest that BLT may improve the response time to the initial treatment.

摘要

重要性

季节性情绪障碍易于与日照相关联。然而,外部光线对非季节性情绪障碍的影响仍不明确。缺乏证据表明强光疗法(BLT)作为这些患者辅助治疗的有效性。

目的

评估BLT作为非季节性抑郁症辅助治疗的有效性。

数据来源

2024年3月,对MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库中的出版物进行了全面检索,以查找评估BLT对非季节性抑郁症患者影响的随机临床试验(RCT)。

研究选择

2000年以来发表的RCT符合要求。纳入BLT与暗红色光或单独抗抑郁药单一疗法之间的比较。

数据提取与合成

采用系统评价方法,对2000年1月1日至2024年3月25日发表的RCT进行分析,使用Mantel-Haenszel方法估计接受和未接受BLT治疗患者之间的差异;使用I²统计量评估异质性。

主要结局与指标

评估症状缓解情况、治疗反应率和抑郁量表。

结果

在这项对11项独特试验(来自858名患者的数据,其中649名女性[75.6%])的系统评价和荟萃分析中,BLT组在统计学上有显著更好的缓解率和反应率(缓解:40.7%对23.5%;优势比[OR],2.42;95%置信区间,1.50 - 3.91;P <.001;I² = 21%;反应:60.4%对38.6%;OR,2.34;95%置信区间,1.46 - 3.75;P <.001;I² = 41%)。对于BLT,基于随访时间的亚组分析也显示出更好的缓解率(<4周:27.4%对9.2%;OR,3.59;95%置信区间,1.45 - 8.88;P =.005;I² = 0%且>4周:46.6%对29.1%;OR,2.18;95%置信区间,1.19 - 4.0;P =.01;I² = 47%)和反应率(<4周:55.6%对27.4%;OR,3.65;95%置信区间,1.81 - 7.33;P <.001;I² = 35%且>4周:63.0%对44.9%;OR,1.79;95%置信区间,1.01 - 3.17;P =.04;I² = 32%)。

结论与意义

这项系统评价和荟萃分析的结果表明,BLT是治疗非季节性抑郁症的有效辅助疗法。此外,结果表明BLT可能会缩短初始治疗的反应时间。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Efficacy and safety of bright light therapy for bipolar depression.明亮光疗法治疗双相抑郁的疗效与安全性。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jul;74(7):408-410. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13005. Epub 2020 May 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验