Ota Seiichi, Yasui Keisuke, Ogata Toshiyuki, Mori Yutaro, Nishio Teiji, Tohyama Naoki, Okamoto Hiroyuki, Kurooka Masahiko, Shimomura Kohei, Kojima Toru, Onishi Hiroshi
Division of Radiological Technology, Department of Medical Technology, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
Division of Medical Physics, School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukakecho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
J Radiat Res. 2025 Jan 22;66(1):52-64. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae092.
The current research on staffing models is primarily focused on conventional external photon beam therapy, which predominantly involves using linear accelerators. This emphasizes the need for comprehensive studies to understand better and define specific particle therapy facilities' staffing requirements. In a 2022 survey of 25 particle therapy facilities in Japan with an 84% response rate, significant insights were obtained regarding workload distribution, defined as the product of personnel count and task time (person-minutes), for patient-related tasks and equipment quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC). The survey revealed that machinery QA/QC tasks were particularly demanding, with an average monthly workload of 376.9 min and weekly tasks averaging 162.1 min. In comparison, patient-related workloads focused on treatment planning, exhibiting substantial time commitments, particularly for scanning and passive scattering techniques. The average workloads for treatment planning per patient were 291.3 and 195.4 min, respectively. In addition, specific patient scenarios such as pre-treatment sedation in pediatric cases require longer durations (averaging 84.5 min), which likely include the workloads of not only the physician responsible for sedation but also the radiotherapy technology and medical physics specialists providing support during sedation and the nursing staff involved in sedation care. These findings underscore the significant time investments required for machinery QA/QC and patient-specific treatment planning in particle therapy facilities, along with the need for specialized care procedures in pediatric cases. The results of this survey also emphasized the challenges and staffing requirements to ensure QA/QC in high-precision medical environments.
目前关于人员配置模式的研究主要集中在传统的外照射光子束治疗上,这种治疗主要使用直线加速器。这凸显了进行全面研究的必要性,以便更好地理解和界定特定粒子治疗设施的人员配置需求。在2022年对日本25家粒子治疗设施进行的一项调查中,回复率为84%,从中获得了关于工作量分布的重要见解,工作量分布定义为人员数量与任务时间的乘积(人·分钟),涉及与患者相关的任务以及设备质量保证和质量控制(QA/QC)。调查显示,机器QA/QC任务要求特别高,平均每月工作量为376.9分钟,每周任务平均为162.1分钟。相比之下,与患者相关的工作量集中在治疗计划上,需要大量时间投入,特别是对于扫描和被动散射技术。每位患者的治疗计划平均工作量分别为291.3分钟和195.4分钟。此外,特定的患者情况,如儿科病例的预处理镇静,需要更长时间(平均84.5分钟),这可能不仅包括负责镇静的医生的工作量,还包括在镇静期间提供支持的放射治疗技术和医学物理专家以及参与镇静护理的护理人员的工作量。这些发现强调了粒子治疗设施在机器QA/QC和针对患者的治疗计划方面需要大量时间投入,以及儿科病例需要专门护理程序。这项调查的结果还强调了在高精度医疗环境中确保QA/QC的挑战和人员配置要求。