Yao Yao, Zhang Xiping, Ge Renjie, Im Hee Shin, Yao Chang
Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China.
Department of Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu 42472, Korea.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2024 Dec 12;44(12):1388-94. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240222-k0001.
To investigate the clinical effect of electroacupuncture (EA) in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).
Fifty-two patients with breast cancer in the regimen of taxane-assisted/neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were randomly divided into an EA group (26 cases, 3 cases dropped out) and a usual care (UC) group (26 cases, 1 case dropped out). In the UC group, on the basis of standard chemotherapy regimen, the routine nursing was administered. In the EA group, on the intervention as the UC group, EA was added, the acupoints included Yintang (GV 24), Baxie (EX-UE 9, the second one), Waiguan (TE 5), Hegu (LI 4), Quchi (LI 11), Zusanli (ST 36), Yinlingquan (SP 9), Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Taixi (KI 3), Taichong (LR 3), Xuanzhong (GB 39) and Bafeng (EX-LE 10, the fourth one). Electric stimulation was attached to Taichong (LR 3) and Sanyinjiao (SP 6) on the same side, with disperse-dense wave and the frequency of 2 Hz/10 Hz, for 30 min. EA started one day before the first cycle of chemotherapy, twice weekly in the first two weeks and once weekly in the rest weeks of chemotherapy. The duration of the intervention with EA was 12 weeks. The incidence of CIPN was compared in week 24 of the trial between the two groups. At the baseline and in week 12 and 24 of the trial, the score of EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer on chemotherapy-induced peripheral nerve toxicity quality of life questionnaire 20), the score of TCM syndrome scale and the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer on quality of life scale) were observed in the two groups. At the baseline and in week 12 of the trial, the sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV) and the motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV) was detected.
In week 24 of the trial, the incidence of CIPN was 17.4% (4/23) in the EA group, lower than that (72.0%, 18/25) in the UC group (<0.001). The incidence of high-grade CIPN was 0% (0/23) in the EA group, lower than that (28.0%, 7/25) in the UC group (<0.05). In week 12 and 24 of the trial, the scores for the sensory nerve symptom of EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 and the total scores were higher when compared with the baseline in the UC group (<0.001, <0.05, <0.01). In week 24 of the trial, the score for the sensory nerve symptom of EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 in the EA group was lower than that of the UC group (<0.05). In week 12 of the trial, SCV of the right superficial peroneal nerve was reduced when compared with the baseline in the UC group (<0.05), and SCV of the left median nerve and the right superficial peroneal nerve was higher in the EA group when compared with the UC group (<0.05, <0.01). In week 12 and 24 of the trial, the scores for the secondary symptoms of TCM scale were decreased in the EA group compared with the baseline (<0.05), and the scores for the primary and secondary symptoms, as well as the total scores of TCM scale were all higher than those of the baseline in the UC group (<0.01, <0.001, <0.05). In week 12 of the trial, the scores for the primary and secondary symptoms, as well as the total score of TCM scale in the EA group were lower than those of the UC group (<0.05, <0.01). In week 24 of the trial, the score for the secondary symptoms and the total score of TCM scale in the EA group were lower than those of the UC group (<0.05). In week 12 of the trial, the scores for fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting in EORTC QLQ-C30 were increased in comparison with the baseline in the UC group (<0.05, <0.01); in week 24 of the trial, the score of the general health in EORTC QLQ-C30 was elevated when compared with the baseline in the EA group (<0.001), and the scores for nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite were decreased in comparison with the baseline (<0.01). In week 12 of the trial, the score of the general health in EORTC QLQ-C30 in the EA group was higher compared with the UC group (<0.01), and the scores for pain, nausea and vomiting were lower (<0.01, <0.05). In week 24 of the trial, the score of the general health in EORTC QLQ-C30 was higher in the EA group compared with the UC group (<0.001), and the score for loss of appetite was lower (<0.05).
Electroacupuncture reduces the incidence and severity of CIPN, ameliorates nerve conduction velocity and improves the quality of life of the patients.
探讨电针预防化疗所致周围神经病变(CIPN)的临床效果。
将52例接受紫杉烷辅助/新辅助化疗方案的乳腺癌患者随机分为电针组(26例,3例退出)和常规护理(UC)组(26例,1例退出)。UC组在标准化疗方案基础上给予常规护理。电针组在UC组干预措施基础上加用电针,穴位包括印堂(GV 24)、八邪(EX-UE 9,第二个)、外关(TE 5)、合谷(LI 4)、曲池(LI 11)、足三里(ST 36)、阴陵泉(SP 9)、三阴交(SP 6)、太溪(KI 3)、太冲(LR 3)、悬钟(GB 39)和八风(EX-LE 10,第四个)。在同侧太冲(LR 3)和三阴交(SP 6)连接电刺激,采用疏密波,频率为2 Hz/10 Hz,持续30分钟。电针在化疗第1周期前1天开始,化疗前两周每周2次,其余化疗周每周1次。电针干预持续12周。比较两组在试验第24周时CIPN的发生率。在试验基线及第12周和24周时,观察两组的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织化疗所致周围神经毒性生活质量问卷20(EORTC QLQ-CIPN20)评分、中医证候量表评分及欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量量表(EORTC QLQ-C30)评分。在试验基线及第12周时,检测感觉神经传导速度(SCV)和运动神经传导速度(MCV)。
试验第24周时,电针组CIPN发生率为17.4%(4/23),低于UC组(72.0%,18/25)(<0.001)。电针组重度CIPN发生率为0%(0/23),低于UC组(28.0%,7/25)(<0.05)。试验第12周和24周时,UC组EORTC QLQ-CIPN20感觉神经症状评分及总分与基线相比升高(<0.001,<0.05,<0.01)。试验第24周时,电针组EORTC QLQ-CIPN20感觉神经症状评分低于UC组(<0.05)。试验第12周时,UC组右侧腓浅神经SCV较基线降低(<0.05),电针组左侧正中神经和右侧腓浅神经SCV高于UC组(<0.05,<0.01)。试验第12周和24周时,电针组中医量表次要症状评分较基线降低(<0.05),UC组中医量表主次症状评分及总分均高于基线(<0.01,<0.001,<0.05)。试验第12周时,电针组中医量表主次症状评分及总分低于UC组(<0.05,<0.01)。试验第24周时,电针组中医量表次要症状评分及总分低于UC组(<0.05)。试验第12周时UC组EORTC QLQ-C30中疲劳、疼痛、恶心呕吐评分较基线升高(<0.05,<0.01);试验第24周时,电针组EORTC QLQ-C30中总体健康评分较基线升高(<0.001),恶心呕吐、食欲减退评分较基线降低(<0.01)。试验第12周时,电针组EORTC QLQ-C30中总体健康评分高于UC组(<0.01),疼痛、恶心呕吐评分低于UC组(<0.01,<0.05)。试验第24周时,电针组EORTC QLQ-C30中总体健康评分高于UC组(<0.001),食欲减退评分低于UC组(<0.05)。
电针可降低CIPN的发生率和严重程度,改善神经传导速度,提高患者生活质量。