Santos Luiz C P, McArthur Michelle, Perkins Nigel, Goodwin Wendy
School Of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, The University of Glasgow, Garscube Campus, Glasgow, UK; School of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2024 Oct 24. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.10.140.
To investigate the psychological, physical and professional impact of veterinary patient safety incidents (PSIs) on veterinary anaesthesia professionals.
We conducted an observational cross-sectional survey, inviting veterinary anaesthesiologists, anaesthesiologists in training and veterinary nurses/technicians through social media platforms from 2 June 2023 to 20 September, 2023. The questionnaire was based on Second Victim Experience and Support Survey (SVEST) and analysed using descriptive statistics and subscale scoring to assess psychological, physical and professional impacts.
A total of 303 participants from 31 countries responded, including North (24%), Central (13.5%) and South America (25%), Europe (13.5%), UK (12.5%), Australia/New Zealand (8.1%) and Asia/Middle East (3.3%). A participation rate cannot be estimated. All respondents described themselves as second victims, with 70% encountering a PSI in the past 6 months. Of the 303 participants, 75% had direct involvement with the incident. Common post-incident challenges included an increased awareness for PSIs (67.1%), fear of new PSIs (62.7%), diminished confidence (56.1%), more defensive medicine practice (46.7%) and sleep disorders (43.3%). Additionally, 62.7% agreed or strongly agreed that they experienced embarrassment post-incident. After a PSI, approximately 69% of the participants reported feeling inadequate in their animal care abilities, and a similar percentage questioned their professional competence. Over half of the respondents (54.6%) became fearful of undertaking high-risk procedures. Approximately 38% of respondents considered leaving the field of anaesthesia, and over 56% harboured thoughts of leaving their job because of the stress from PSIs. Additionally, a significant proportion (69.8%) reported not taking time off work following PSIs.
The study identifies a significant psychological, physical and professional impact on the surveyed veterinary anaesthesia professionals, with notable effects on their emotional well-being and professional self-efficacy. The findings emphasize the need for supportive measures and interventions to mitigate the adverse effects experienced by these individuals.
调查兽医患者安全事件(PSI)对兽医麻醉专业人员在心理、身体和职业方面的影响。
我们进行了一项观察性横断面调查,于2023年6月2日至2023年9月20日通过社交媒体平台邀请兽医麻醉师、实习麻醉师以及兽医护士/技术员参与。调查问卷基于“第二受害者经历与支持调查”(SVEST),并采用描述性统计和分量表评分进行分析,以评估心理、身体和职业影响。
来自31个国家的303名参与者做出了回应,其中包括北美洲(24%)、中美洲(13.5%)和南美洲(25%)、欧洲(13.5%)、英国(12.5%)、澳大利亚/新西兰(8.1%)以及亚洲/中东(3.3%)。无法估计参与率。所有受访者均将自己描述为第二受害者,70%的人在过去6个月内遭遇过PSI。在303名参与者中,75%直接参与了该事件。常见的事件后挑战包括对PSI的认识增加(67.1%)、对新PSI的恐惧(62.7%)、信心下降(56.1%)、更多的防御性医疗行为(46.7%)以及睡眠障碍(43.3%)。此外,62.7%的人同意或强烈同意他们在事件后感到尴尬。在经历PSI后,约69%的参与者表示在动物护理能力方面感到不足,类似比例的人质疑自己的专业能力。超过一半的受访者(54.6%)对进行高风险程序感到恐惧。约38%的受访者考虑离开麻醉领域,超过56%的人因PSI带来的压力而有离职的想法。此外,相当一部分人(69.8%)表示在经历PSI后没有休假。
该研究确定了PSI对接受调查的兽医麻醉专业人员在心理、身体和职业方面有重大影响,对他们的情绪健康和职业自我效能感有显著影响。研究结果强调需要采取支持措施和干预措施,以减轻这些人所经历的不利影响。