• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚昆士兰州2016年《精神健康法》下非自愿精神科治疗增加背后的原因——临床医生视角

Reasons behind the rise in involuntary psychiatric treatment under mental health act 2016, Queensland, Australia - Clinician perspectives.

作者信息

Wild Kimbali, Sawhney Jappan, Wyder Marianne, Sebar Bernadette, Gill Neeraj

机构信息

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia; Division of Mental Health, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Mental Health and Specialist Services, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2025 Jan-Feb;98:102061. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102061. Epub 2024 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102061
PMID:39658485
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite legislative reform to promote less restrictive treatment options, the rates of involuntary psychiatric treatment in Queensland, Australia continue to rise. This paper aims to investigate mental health clinicians' perspectives of reasons behind the high and increasing rates of involuntary psychiatric treatment in Queensland.

METHOD

Qualitative methodology was used to explore clinician perspectives by facilitating two face-to-face focus groups. Purposive sampling was used to select clinicians of multiple disciplines from inpatient and community adult mental health teams. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilised to analyse and interpret data.

FINDINGS

The findings suggested a broad consensus that involuntary treatment is over-utilised in public mental health services. Six main themes were identified, including risk aversion, systemic service deficiencies, lack of voluntary alternatives, increased substance use in the community, legislative and policy shortcomings, and barriers to enacting criteria in the legislation.

CONCLUSION

This paper highlights that legislative reform alone will be ineffective in reducing involuntary psychiatric treatment, and adequate resources, training, policy and culture change are necessary for successful implementation of less restrictive practices. The reforms require reorientation of the implementation of policy, as well as legislation to align the Queensland mental health system within a human rights framework.

摘要

目的

尽管进行了立法改革以推广限制较少的治疗方案,但澳大利亚昆士兰州非自愿精神科治疗的比例仍在持续上升。本文旨在调查昆士兰州非自愿精神科治疗比例居高不下且不断上升的背后,心理健康临床医生的看法。

方法

采用定性研究方法,通过组织两次面对面焦点小组来探讨临床医生的观点。采用目的抽样法从住院部和社区成人心理健康团队中选取多学科的临床医生。运用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析和解读。

结果

研究结果表明,人们普遍认为非自愿治疗在公共心理健康服务中被过度使用。确定了六个主要主题,包括规避风险、系统性服务缺陷、缺乏自愿替代方案、社区药物使用增加、立法和政策缺陷以及立法中标准实施的障碍。

结论

本文强调,仅靠立法改革在减少非自愿精神科治疗方面将是无效的,充足的资源、培训、政策和文化变革对于成功实施限制较少的做法是必要的。改革需要重新调整政策的实施方向,以及立法,以使昆士兰州的心理健康系统符合人权框架。

相似文献

1
Reasons behind the rise in involuntary psychiatric treatment under mental health act 2016, Queensland, Australia - Clinician perspectives.澳大利亚昆士兰州2016年《精神健康法》下非自愿精神科治疗增加背后的原因——临床医生视角
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2025 Jan-Feb;98:102061. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102061. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
Measuring the impact of revised mental health legislation on human rights in Queensland, Australia.测量澳大利亚昆士兰州修订后的心理健康立法对人权的影响。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Nov-Dec;73:101634. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101634. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
3
Experiences of involuntary psychiatric admission decision-making: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of the perspectives of service users, informal carers, and professionals.非自愿精神科住院决策的体验:服务使用者、非正式照顾者和专业人员观点的系统回顾和元综合。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Nov-Dec;73:101645. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101645. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
4
A Study into the Operation of the Queensland Mental Health Review Tribunal.昆士兰精神健康审查法庭运作研究
Med Law Rev. 2021 Aug 9;29(1):106-127. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwaa043.
5
Qualitative exploration of stakeholders' perspectives of involuntary admission under the Mental Health Act 2001 in Ireland.定性探索利益相关者对 2001 年《精神健康法》下非自愿入院的看法。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(6):554-569. doi: 10.1111/inm.12270. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
How involuntary commitment impacts on the burden of care of the family.非自愿住院治疗如何影响家庭的照料负担。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2007 Aug;16(4):247-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2007.00474.x.
7
Human rights implications of introducing a new mental health act - principles, challenges and opportunities.引入新的《精神卫生法》的人权影响——原则、挑战和机遇。
Australas Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(2):167-170. doi: 10.1177/1039856220901483. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
How shortcomings in the mental health system affect the use of involuntary community treatment orders.心理健康系统中的缺陷如何影响非自愿社区治疗令的使用。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Jul;41(3):351-356. doi: 10.1071/AH16074.
9
The blind spots of psychiatric reform in Greece.希腊精神病学改革的盲区。
Psychiatriki. 2024 Jun 19;35(2):99-102. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.009. Epub 2024 May 29.
10
What Does "Least Restrictive" or "Less Restrictive" Mean in Mental Health Law? Contradictions and Confusion in the Case of Queensland, Australia.在精神卫生法中,“最不限制”或“较少限制”是什么意思?澳大利亚昆士兰州案例中的矛盾与困惑。
Am J Law Med. 2023 Jul;49(2-3):286-300. doi: 10.1017/amj.2023.32. Epub 2024 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of introducing a capacity-based mental health law in Norway: qualitative exploration of multi-stakeholder perspectives.挪威引入基于能力的精神卫生法的影响:多利益相关方观点的定性探索
BJPsych Open. 2025 Feb 25;11(2):e35. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.810.