• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在老年人群中的应用:一项综述

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) as a measure among elderly population. A review.

作者信息

Ciamarra Paola, Corbi Graziamaria, Gimigliano Francesca, Feola Alessandro, Campobasso Carlo Pietro

机构信息

Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples.

Department of Medical and Translational Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Jul;47(15):3773-3780. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2439567. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2439567
PMID:39659217
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To review the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS2.0) application in elderly population.

METHODS

A review of English articles was performed using the following databases: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase. Only articles assessing disability through WHODAS2.0 in elderly population (>60-years-old) were included according to PRISMA Statement.

RESULTS

37 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria reporting 125.624 cases of elderly whose disability was assessed using WHODAS2.0 in different versions (36-items-version in 15 studies; 12-items-version in 15 papers; both versions in 3 articles; data unavailable in 4 studies). Four different aims were recognized: WHODAS 2.0 was used in 12 studies to assess the prevalence of disability, 25 studies of association between disability and environmental or medical conditions; 9 studies of validation of WHODAS and 2 studies to verify the outcome of therapies on functioning. WHODAS2.0 is a valid measure of disability among elderly, able to identify the relation between disability, and medical and environmental factors. Unfortunately, only few Countries apply the "bio-psycho-social" approach to social and health policies context. Therefore, it is recommended to adopt a rehabilitation perspective in every legislation. These results could serve as baseline data to monitor the application of WHODAS2.0 over the coming years.

摘要

目的

回顾世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS2.0)在老年人群中的应用情况。

方法

使用以下数据库对英文文章进行综述:PubMed/Medline、Scopus、科学网、Cochrane、Embase。根据PRISMA声明,仅纳入通过WHODAS2.0评估老年人群(年龄>60岁)残疾情况的文章。

结果

37篇论文符合纳入标准,报告了125624例使用不同版本WHODAS2.0评估残疾情况的老年人(15项研究使用36项版本;15篇论文使用12项版本;3篇文章同时使用两个版本;4项研究数据不可用)。确定了四个不同的目标:12项研究使用WHODAS 2.0评估残疾患病率,25项研究探讨残疾与环境或医疗状况之间的关联;9项研究验证WHODAS,2项研究验证治疗对功能的效果。WHODAS2.0是评估老年人残疾情况的有效指标,能够确定残疾与医疗和环境因素之间的关系。遗憾的是,只有少数国家在社会和卫生政策背景下采用“生物 - 心理 - 社会”方法。因此,建议在各项立法中采用康复视角。这些结果可作为未来几年监测WHODAS2.0应用情况的基线数据。

相似文献

1
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) as a measure among elderly population. A review.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在老年人群中的应用:一项综述
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Jul;47(15):3773-3780. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2439567. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review.世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0:国际系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Nov;39(23):2347-2380. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: responsiveness in detecting long-term functional disability after surgery.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0:术后长期功能残疾检测中的反应性。
Br J Surg. 2024 Dec 24;112(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf002.
5
Measurement Properties and Minimal Important Change of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Persons With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 在腰痛患者中的测量性能和最小重要变化:系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb;104(2):287-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
6
Interventions for preventing abuse in the elderly.预防老年人受虐待的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;2016(8):CD010321. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010321.pub2.
7
Psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 in patients with orthopedic injuries from road traffic crashes in Bangladesh.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0在孟加拉国道路交通事故所致骨科损伤患者中的心理测量学特性
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Jun;47(13):3421-3435. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2425755. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
8
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
Selegiline for Alzheimer's disease.司来吉兰用于治疗阿尔茨海默病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD000442. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000442.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Disability and Factors Associated with Disability in the Discharge Transition Phase After Acquired Brain Injury: An Observational Follow-Up Study.后天性脑损伤后出院过渡阶段的残疾及与残疾相关的因素:一项观察性随访研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;13(16):1989. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161989.
2
Association between transcranial direct current stimulation and disability and quality of life in individuals with Parkinsonism: cross-sectional study.帕金森综合征患者经颅直流电刺激与残疾及生活质量之间的关联:横断面研究
Front Neurol. 2025 May 21;16:1601778. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1601778. eCollection 2025.