Reinhart Nolan M, Tate Jackson P, Budin Jacob S, Winter Julianna E, Lee Olivia C, Sherman William F
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1415 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Louisiana State University, 2000 Canal St, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Nov 22;59:102839. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102839. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Early diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis is essential to prevent potential complications including sepsis, extensive bone resection, amputation, and death. Despite current treatment strategies for management of osteomyelitis, recurrence rates reported in the literature are upwards of 25 %. Current evidence comparing the efficacy of differing surgical treatments of osteomyelitis is inconclusive. The purpose of this study is to compare rates of re-debridement and amputation in patients who receive either debridement alone or debridement with placement of local antibiotic delivery systems as initial treatment for lower extremity long bone osteomyelitis.
A retrospective cohort study was performed to investigate complication rates after surgical treatment methods for osteomyelitis of the femur and tibia. The rates of re-debridement and amputation were compared in patients who received either debridement alone or debridement with placement of local antibiotic delivery systems.
This study reports 73 % lower rates of re-debridement after debridement and local antibiotic delivery in tibial osteomyelitis, and 83 % lower rates of re-debridement after debridement and placement of local antibiotic delivery systems in femoral osteomyelitis compared to debridement alone. There was no significant difference in amputation rates between treatment groups for either tibial (7.4 vs 5.7 %; OR: 1.31; 95 % CI, 0.92-1.87) or femoral osteomyelitis (2.4 vs 1.4 %; OR: 1.65; 95 % CI, 0.71-4.01).
There was a significantly decreased likelihood of re-debridement for patients who underwent initial treatment with combined debridement and placement of antibiotic delivery systems compared to debridement alone. Providers may consider this when comparing treatment options for their patients with lower extremity osteomyelitis.
骨髓炎的早期诊断和治疗对于预防包括败血症、广泛骨切除、截肢和死亡在内的潜在并发症至关重要。尽管目前有骨髓炎的治疗策略,但文献报道的复发率高达25%以上。目前比较不同手术治疗骨髓炎疗效的证据尚无定论。本研究的目的是比较单纯清创或清创并放置局部抗生素输送系统作为下肢长骨骨髓炎初始治疗患者的再次清创率和截肢率。
进行一项回顾性队列研究,以调查股骨和胫骨骨髓炎手术治疗方法后的并发症发生率。比较单纯清创或清创并放置局部抗生素输送系统患者的再次清创率和截肢率。
本研究报告,与单纯清创相比,胫骨骨髓炎清创并局部应用抗生素后再次清创率降低73%,股骨骨髓炎清创并放置局部抗生素输送系统后再次清创率降低83%。胫骨(7.4%对5.7%;OR:1.31;95%CI,0.92 - 1.87)或股骨骨髓炎(2.4%对1.4%;OR:1.65;95%CI,0.71 - 4.01)治疗组之间的截肢率无显著差异。
与单纯清创相比,初始治疗采用清创联合抗生素输送系统放置的患者再次清创的可能性显著降低。在为下肢骨髓炎患者比较治疗方案时,医疗服务提供者可考虑这一点。