• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症产科患者研究中的结果报告:一项系统综述。

Outcome reporting in studies on critically ill obstetric patients: A systematic review.

作者信息

Viau-Lapointe Julien, Kfouri Julia, Thompson Mary, Ashraf Rizwana, D'Souza Rohan, Lapinsky Stephen

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Obstet Med. 2024 Dec 8:1753495X241302848. doi: 10.1177/1753495X241302848.

DOI:10.1177/1753495X241302848
PMID:39660029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11626548/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review is the first step in the process of standardizing outcome reporting through the development of a core outcome set for research on critically ill obstetric patients (COSCO).

METHODS

A five-database search was performed to identify randomized and non-randomized studies published before November 2017, on patients admitted to intensive care or high-dependency units during or immediately after pregnancy. Reported outcomes were categorized into domains and definitions were documented.

RESULTS

Of the 12,581 citations reviewed, 136 studies were included. The most reported outcome domains were maternal all-cause mortality ( = 128, 94.5%), resource use ( = 116, 85.6%), and clinical/physiological outcomes ( = 111, 82.8%). Outcomes related to functioning/life impact and adverse effects of treatment were only reported in four (2.9%) studies. There was inconsistency in outcome definitions.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified considerable variation in outcome reporting and definitions and generated an outcome list to consider in COSCO development.

摘要

引言

本系统评价是通过制定危重症产科患者研究的核心结局集(COSCO)来规范结局报告过程的第一步。

方法

进行了五数据库检索,以识别2017年11月之前发表的关于妊娠期间或产后立即入住重症监护病房或高依赖病房患者的随机和非随机研究。将报告的结局分类到各个领域,并记录定义。

结果

在检索的12581条文献中,纳入了136项研究。报告最多的结局领域是孕产妇全因死亡率(n = 128,94.5%)、资源利用(n = 116,85.6%)和临床/生理结局(n = 111,82.8%)。与功能/生活影响及治疗不良反应相关的结局仅在四项(2.9%)研究中被报告。结局定义存在不一致性。

结论

本评价发现结局报告和定义存在相当大的差异,并生成了一份在COSCO制定过程中需考虑的结局清单。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/11626548/9ead52fe9ae6/10.1177_1753495X241302848-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/11626548/9ead52fe9ae6/10.1177_1753495X241302848-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52d7/11626548/9ead52fe9ae6/10.1177_1753495X241302848-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcome reporting in studies on critically ill obstetric patients: A systematic review.危重症产科患者研究中的结果报告:一项系统综述。
Obstet Med. 2024 Dec 8:1753495X241302848. doi: 10.1177/1753495X241302848.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Outcome reporting in cardio-obstetrics studies: A systematic review.心产科研究的结局报告:系统评价。
Am Heart J. 2024 Dec;278:223-234. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.008. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
5
Development of a Core Outcome Set for research on critically ill obstetric patients: A study protocol.危重症产科患者研究核心结局集的制定:一项研究方案
Obstet Med. 2018 Sep;11(3):132-136. doi: 10.1177/1753495X18772996. Epub 2018 May 14.
6
Definitions of Hemodynamic Instability Related to Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review Protocol.危重症患者肾替代治疗相关血流动力学不稳定的定义:一项系统评价方案
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 Jan 7;12:20543581241312631. doi: 10.1177/20543581241312631. eCollection 2025.
7
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of delirium in critically ill adults.用于治疗重症成年患者谵妄的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):CD011749. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011749.pub2.
8
Examining the etiology and pregnancy outcomes of 152 critically ill pregnant patients in the Intensive Care Unit.研究重症监护病房中152例危重症孕妇的病因及妊娠结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07162-6.
9
Association of Surrogate Decision-making Interventions for Critically Ill Adults With Patient, Family, and Resource Use Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.危重症成人代理决策干预与患者、家庭和资源使用结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e197229. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7229.
10
Early warning systems in obstetrics: A systematic literature review.产科学预警系统:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217864. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-reported outcomes in research on critically ill obstetric patients.危重症产科患者研究中的患者报告结局
Obstet Med. 2024 Oct 16:1753495X241290681. doi: 10.1177/1753495X241290681.
2
Trends in Maternal Mortality and Severe Maternal Morbidity During Delivery-Related Hospitalizations in the United States, 2008 to 2021.2008 年至 2021 年期间美国分娩相关住院治疗中的孕产妇死亡率和严重产妇发病率趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317641. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17641.
3
Variations in reported outcomes in studies on vasa previa: a systematic review.
研究报道的帆状胎盘前置结局存在差异:系统评价。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Aug;2(3):100116. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100116. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
4
The Moral Imperative to Include Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials of Interventions for COVID-19.将孕妇纳入 COVID-19 干预措施临床试验的道德义务。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 17;173(10):836-837. doi: 10.7326/M20-3106. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
Severe Maternal Morbidity in Canada: Temporal Trends and Regional Variations, 2003-2016.加拿大的严重孕产妇发病率:2003 - 2016年的时间趋势和地区差异
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Nov;41(11):1589-1598.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 May 3.
6
A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery.已经为医学研究中的结果开发了一种分类法,以帮助提高知识发现。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;96:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.020. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
7
A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia.一项系统评价,评价了评估子痫前期治疗的随机试验中主要结局和结局测量报告。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Dec;139(3):262-267. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12298. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.《COMET手册:第1.0版》
Trials. 2017 Jun 20;18(Suppl 3):280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4.
9
Applicable or non-applicable: investigations of clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews.适用或不适用:系统评价中临床异质性的调查
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 17;16:19. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0121-7.
10
Critical illness in pregnancy: part I: an approach to a pregnant patient in the ICU and common obstetric disorders.妊娠合并重症:第一部分:ICU 中妊娠患者的处理方法和常见产科疾病。
Chest. 2015 Oct;148(4):1093-1104. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1998.