Tan Chin Wen, Koh Juan Zhen, Jin Hanwei, Han Nian-Lin Reena, Cheng Shang-Ming, Ta Andy Wee An, Goh Han Leong, Sng Ban Leong
Department of Women's Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 22;10(23):e40602. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40602. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
A major barrier to optimal pain management is the difficulty in predicting and assessing patients at high risk for significant pain across multiple locations within the institution in a timely manner. This is compounded by the fragmented display of clinical information on enterprise clinical platform, which further hinders delay the reviews and hence the increased risk of untreated pain. We evaluated and compared the predictive performance of six modelling techniques in predicting significant pain, defined as the maximum pain score of 3 or more on movement at the 13th to 24th hour after spinal morphine administration during caesarean delivery.
We retrieved medical records from women who underwent caesarean delivery and received postoperative spinal morphine in a single specialist maternity hospital in Singapore between Aug 2019 and Aug 2022. We extracted 120 clinical variables from the medical records of eligible patients and further selected 23 to improve algorithm accuracies. The dataset was split randomly, with 80 % of patients (n = 5248) used for training the models, and 20 % (n = 1313) reserved for validation.
The study cohort comprised 6561 patients with an incidence of significant postoperative pain of 7.9 %. Ridge regression demonstrated the best performance with both the full (AUC: 0.649) and selected (AUC: 0.719) feature sets. By reducing the number of features, Ridge regression, LASSO, Elastic net, and XGBoost showed similar in AUC (0.704-0.719), sensitivity (0.644-0.695), specificity (0.644-0.705), positive predictive value (0.155-0.179), and negative predictive value (0.949-0.955) in predicting significant postoperative pain. These were attributed to the top three variables, mainly the last recorded postoperative pain score (on movement) before the prediction point, mean and standard deviation of the hourly maximum postoperative pain score (at rest) at 0 to 12th hour.
Future research will aim to refine these models and explore their implementation in clinical settings to enhance real-time pain management and risk stratification for women after caesarean delivery.
优化疼痛管理的一个主要障碍是难以及时预测和评估机构内多个部位存在严重疼痛高风险的患者。企业临床平台上临床信息的分散显示使这一问题更加复杂,这进一步阻碍了审查工作,进而增加了疼痛未得到治疗的风险。我们评估并比较了六种建模技术在预测严重疼痛方面的预测性能,严重疼痛定义为剖宫产术中给予脊髓吗啡后第13至24小时运动时最大疼痛评分达到3分或更高。
我们检索了2019年8月至2022年8月期间在新加坡一家专科妇产医院接受剖宫产并术后接受脊髓吗啡治疗的女性的医疗记录。我们从符合条件的患者的医疗记录中提取了120个临床变量,并进一步选择了23个以提高算法准确性。数据集被随机拆分,80%的患者(n = 5248)用于训练模型,20%(n = 1313)留作验证。
研究队列包括6561名患者,术后严重疼痛发生率为7.9%。岭回归在完整(AUC:0.649)和选定(AUC:0.719)特征集上均表现出最佳性能。通过减少特征数量,岭回归、套索回归、弹性网络和极端梯度提升在预测术后严重疼痛方面的AUC(0.704 - 0.719)、敏感性(0.644 - 0.695)、特异性(0.644 - 0.705)、阳性预测值(0.155 - 0.179)和阴性预测值(0.949 - 0.955)相似。这些归因于前三个变量,主要是预测点之前最后记录的术后疼痛评分(运动时)、第0至12小时每小时最大术后疼痛评分(静息时)的平均值和标准差。
未来的研究旨在完善这些模型,并探索它们在临床环境中的应用,以加强剖宫产术后女性的实时疼痛管理和风险分层。