Begum Khurshida, Chua Hubert C, Alam M Jahangir, Garey Kevin W, Jo Jinhee
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas, USA.
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jan 7;13(1):e0160824. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01608-24. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
species lacking toxin genes (non-toxigenic or NTCD) may confer protection against CDI. However, current diagnostic tests detect either toxin proteins or toxin genes and cannot detect NTCD. This study developed a molecular testing method that uniquely identified NTCD and assessed its prevalence in a clinical cohort. A quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was developed and validated using reference strains. Analytic sensitivity was determined using DNA from reference NTCD strains, and qPCR efficiency was assessed using the slope of the standard curves of DNA dilutions. A random selection of 95 clinical stool samples, tested using the GDH enzyme and toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA), was used to evaluate the prevalence of NTCD in hospitalized patients tested for CDI. The KB-1/KB-2 primers and probe designed were specific for NTCD strains and did not amplify with toxigenic or other related strains. The NTCD qPCR assay analytical sensitivity was linear between 3 × 10 and 3 × 10 gDNA ( = 0.999; < 0.0001). No NTCD was found in 25 GDH-EIA -/- samples compared to 5 of 25 (20%) GDH-EIA +/- samples and 2 of 23 (8.7%) GDH-EIA +/+ samples. Of samples detected with NTCD, median NTCD DNA was 33,039 (IQR: 22.449-45.688) in GDH-EIA +/- samples and 370 [IQR: 159-583] in GDH-EIA +/+ samples. The new qPCR NTCD assay identified NTCD colonization in 7% of hospitalized patients tested for CDI. This NTCD assay may have important implications for diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship as colonization with NTCD strains may offer protection against CDI.IMPORTANCECurrent diagnostic strategies do not detect non-toxigenic (NTCD) strains, which may provide protection against infection (CDI). Detecting these strains is critical as it underscores the importance of avoiding unnecessary antibiotic treatment in patients colonized with NTCD. To better guide clinical decisions and enhance the understanding of NTCD epidemiology, molecular assays that specifically target non-coding regions unique to NTCD strains are needed. In this study, we developed and validated a qPCR assay capable of uniquely identifying NTCD strains. This innovative assay holds significant potential for applications in public health, infection control, diagnostic, and therapeutic strategies related to CDI.
缺乏毒素基因的菌株(非产毒或NTCD)可能对艰难梭菌感染(CDI)具有保护作用。然而,目前的诊断测试只能检测毒素蛋白或毒素基因,无法检测NTCD。本研究开发了一种分子检测方法,可独特地识别NTCD并评估其在临床队列中的流行情况。使用参考菌株开发并验证了一种定量PCR(qPCR)检测方法。使用来自参考NTCD菌株的DNA确定分析灵敏度,并使用DNA稀释标准曲线的斜率评估qPCR效率。随机选择95份临床粪便样本,使用谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)酶和毒素酶免疫测定(EIA)进行检测,以评估接受CDI检测的住院患者中NTCD的流行情况。设计的KB-1/KB-2引物和探针对NTCD菌株具有特异性,不会扩增产毒或其他相关菌株。NTCD qPCR检测方法的分析灵敏度在3×10至3×10 gDNA之间呈线性关系(r = 0.999;P < 0.0001)。在25份GDH-EIA阴性样本中未发现NTCD,而在25份GDH-EIA弱阳性样本中有5份(20%)以及23份GDH-EIA阳性样本中有2份(8.7%)检测到NTCD。在检测到NTCD的样本中,GDH-EIA弱阳性样本中NTCD DNA的中位数为33,039(四分位间距:22,449 - 45,688),GDH-EIA阳性样本中为370[四分位间距:159 - 583]。新的qPCR NTCD检测方法在接受CDI检测的住院患者中发现7%存在NTCD定植。这种NTCD检测方法可能对诊断和抗菌药物管理具有重要意义,因为NTCD菌株的定植可能对CDI具有保护作用。重要性当前的诊断策略无法检测到非产毒(NTCD)菌株,而这些菌株可能对艰难梭菌感染(CDI)提供保护。检测这些菌株至关重要,因为这凸显了避免对NTCD定植患者进行不必要抗生素治疗的重要性。为了更好地指导临床决策并增进对NTCD流行病学的了解,需要专门针对NTCD菌株独特非编码区域的分子检测方法。在本研究中,我们开发并验证了一种能够独特识别NTCD菌株的qPCR检测方法。这种创新检测方法在与CDI相关的公共卫生、感染控制、诊断和治疗策略应用方面具有巨大潜力。