• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.高敏艰难梭菌毒素检测与应用谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素酶联免疫吸附试验及细胞毒素检测的艰难梭菌实验室算法的高度一致性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jan 28;58(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01629-19.
2
Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.实验室比较细胞毒性中和测定法与超敏单分子计数技术,用于检测艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B、PCR、酶免疫测定法和多步骤算法。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;95(1):20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
3
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology.利用自动化单分子计数技术检测艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B 的超敏性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Oct 25;56(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00908-18. Print 2018 Nov.
4
Evaluation of Cycle Threshold, Toxin Concentration, and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Discordant Diagnostic Test Results.诊断试验结果不一致的艰难梭菌感染患者的循环阈值、毒素浓度及临床特征评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 23;58(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01681-19.
5
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins in Stool by Use of Single-Molecule Counting Technology: Comparison with Detection of Free Toxin by Cell Culture Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay.利用单分子计数技术检测粪便中的艰难梭菌毒素:与细胞培养细胞毒性中和试验检测游离毒素的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00719-19. Print 2019 Nov.
6
Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.临床实验室中采用多重检测算法检测艰难梭菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):889-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01801-09. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
7
Simultaneous Detection of Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin A/B: Comparison of the C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE and RIDASCREEN Assays.同时检测谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素 A/B:C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE 和 RIDASCREEN 检测方法的比较。
Ann Lab Med. 2019 Mar;39(2):214-217. doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.2.214.
8
Evaluation of a rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.评估一种用于同时检测谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素以诊断艰难梭菌感染的快速膜酶免疫测定法。
Ann Lab Med. 2014 May;34(3):235-9. doi: 10.3343/alm.2014.34.3.235. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
9
Performance of TechLab C. DIFF QUIK CHEK and TechLab C. DIFFICILE TOX A/B II for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples.TechLab艰难梭菌快速检测试剂盒和TechLab艰难梭菌毒素A/B II检测试剂盒在粪便样本中检测艰难梭菌的性能。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;59(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.04.018. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
10
Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.用于检测艰难梭菌谷氨酸脱氢酶及毒素A/B的mariPOC检测的前瞻性评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Mar 25;58(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01872-19.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis of infection and impact of testing.感染的诊断与检测的影响
J Med Microbiol. 2024 Dec;73(12). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001939.
2
Emerging Diagnostics in Infection.感染病学中的新兴诊断技术
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 8;25(16):8672. doi: 10.3390/ijms25168672.
3
Clostridioides difficile Diarrhea: An Emerging Problem in a South Indian Tertiary Care Hospital.艰难梭菌腹泻:印度南部一家三级护理医院中出现的新问题。
J Lab Physicians. 2021 Jul 9;13(4):346-352. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731944. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
rRNA Analysis Based on Long-Read High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals a More Accurate Diagnostic for the Bacterial Infection of Ascites.基于长读长高通量测序的 rRNA 分析可更准确地诊断腹水细菌感染。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Nov 17;2021:6287280. doi: 10.1155/2021/6287280. eCollection 2021.
5
Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Testing for Higher Diagnostic Accuracy.用于提高诊断准确性的超敏艰难梭菌毒素检测
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01913-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased Clinical Specificity with Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins: Reduction of Overdiagnosis Compared to Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests.超敏检测艰难梭菌毒素可提高临床特异性:与核酸扩增检测相比,减少过度诊断。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00945-19. Print 2019 Nov.
2
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins in Stool by Use of Single-Molecule Counting Technology: Comparison with Detection of Free Toxin by Cell Culture Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay.利用单分子计数技术检测粪便中的艰难梭菌毒素:与细胞培养细胞毒性中和试验检测游离毒素的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00719-19. Print 2019 Nov.
3
Toxin A-Predominant Pathogenic Clostridioides difficile: A Novel Clinical Phenotype.产毒为主的艰难梭菌:一种新的临床表型。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 10;70(12):2628-2633. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz727.
4
Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.实验室比较细胞毒性中和测定法与超敏单分子计数技术,用于检测艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B、PCR、酶免疫测定法和多步骤算法。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;95(1):20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
5
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins Reveals Suboptimal Accuracy of Toxin Gene Cycle Thresholds for Toxin Predictions.超敏检测艰难梭菌毒素揭示毒素基因循环阈值对毒素预测的准确性欠佳。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 May 24;57(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01885-18. Print 2019 Jun.
6
The predictive value of quantitative nucleic acid amplification detection of Clostridium difficile toxin gene for faecal sample toxin status and patient outcome.艰难梭菌毒素基因定量核酸扩增检测对粪便样本毒素状态和患者预后的预测价值。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0205941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205941. eCollection 2018.
7
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology.利用自动化单分子计数技术检测艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B 的超敏性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Oct 25;56(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00908-18. Print 2018 Nov.
8
Sensitivity of Single-Molecule Array Assays for Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Comparison to Conventional Laboratory Testing Algorithms.单细胞阵列分析检测艰难梭菌毒素的敏感性与传统实验室检测算法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Jul 26;56(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00452-18. Print 2018 Aug.
9
Comparison of Clostridioides difficile Stool Toxin Concentrations in Adults With Symptomatic Infection and Asymptomatic Carriage Using an Ultrasensitive Quantitative Immunoassay.采用超敏定量免疫法比较有症状感染和无症状携带的成人艰难梭菌粪便毒素浓度。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):78-86. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy415.
10
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA) 2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.

高敏艰难梭菌毒素检测与应用谷氨酸脱氢酶和毒素酶联免疫吸附试验及细胞毒素检测的艰难梭菌实验室算法的高度一致性。

High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Clinical Virology Laboratory, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jan 28;58(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01629-19.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.01629-19
PMID:31776192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6989068/
Abstract

The Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B (Clarity) assay is an automated, ultrasensitive immunoassay for the detection of toxins in stool. In this study, the performance of the Clarity assay was compared to that of a multistep algorithm using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxins A and B arbitrated by a semiquantitative cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA). The performance of the assay was evaluated using 211 residual deidentified stool samples tested with a GDH-and-toxin EIA (C. Diff Quik Chek Complete; Techlab), with GDH-and-toxin discordant samples tested with CCNA. The stool samples were stored at -80°C before being tested with the Clarity assay. For samples discordant between Clarity and the standard-of-care algorithm, the samples were tested with PCR (Xpert ; Cepheid), and chart review was performed. The testing algorithm resulted in 34 GDH/toxin, 53 GDH/toxin, and 124 GDH/toxin samples, of which 39 were CCNA and 85 were CCNA Clarity had 96.2% negative agreement with GDH/toxin samples, 100% positive agreement with GDH/toxin samples, and 95.3% agreement with GDH/toxin/CCNA samples. The Clarity result was invalid for one sample. Clarity agreed with 61.5% of GDH/toxin/CCNA samples, 90.0% of GDH/toxin/CCNA (high-positive) samples, and 31.6% of GDH/toxin/CCNA (low-positive) samples. The Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B assay demonstrated high agreement with a testing algorithm utilizing a GDH-and-toxin EIA and CCNA. This novel automated assay may offer an accurate, stand-alone solution for infection (CDI) diagnostics, and further prospective clinical studies are merited.

摘要

Singulex Clarity C. diff 毒素 A/B(Clarity)检测法是一种用于检测粪便中毒素的自动化、超敏免疫检测法。在这项研究中,Clarity 检测法的性能与使用酶免疫测定法(EIA)检测谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)和毒素 A、B,并用半定量细胞细胞毒性中和测定法(CCNA)仲裁的多步算法进行了比较。使用与 GDH 和毒素 EIA(C. Diff Quik Chek Complete;Techlab)检测呈 GDH 和毒素不一致的 CCNA 检测法对 211 份经鉴定的粪便残留样本进行了检测,评估了该检测法的性能。这些粪便样本在进行 Clarity 检测前储存在-80°C。对于 Clarity 与标准护理算法不一致的样本,使用 PCR(Xpert;Cepheid)进行了检测,并进行了图表审查。该检测算法导致 34 份 GDH/毒素、53 份 GDH/毒素和 124 份 GDH/毒素样本,其中 39 份为 CCNA,85 份为 CCNA Clarity 与 GDH/毒素样本的阴性一致性为 96.2%,与 GDH/毒素样本的阳性一致性为 100%,与 GDH/毒素/CCNA 样本的一致性为 95.3%。一个样本的 Clarity 结果无效。Clarity 与 61.5%的 GDH/毒素/CCNA 样本、90.0%的 GDH/毒素/CCNA(高阳性)样本和 31.6%的 GDH/毒素/CCNA(低阳性)样本一致。Singulex Clarity C. diff 毒素 A/B 检测法与使用 GDH 和毒素 EIA 以及 CCNA 的检测算法具有高度一致性。这种新型自动化检测法可能为 感染(CDI)诊断提供一种准确、独立的解决方案,值得进一步开展前瞻性临床研究。