• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较开放与腹腔镜部分肾切除术疗效的前瞻性、随机试验。

A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing the Outcomes of Open vs Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy.

机构信息

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Urol. 2022 Aug;208(2):259-267. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002695. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000002695
PMID:35404109
Abstract

PURPOSE

Partial nephrectomy is the standard treatment for renal tumors <7 cm, and the trend toward minimally invasive surgery has increased. However, data that could support its use and benefits are still lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing surgical, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing open partial nephrectomy (OPN) or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Randomization was 1:1 to OPN or LPN for the treatment of renal tumors <7 cm. The primary endpoint was surgical complications up to 90 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were comparison of surgical, oncologic and functional results.

RESULTS

We randomized 208 patients between 2012 and 2020 (110 with OPN vs 98 with LPN). Operative data showed no differences in operative time, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, transfusions or length of hospital stay. Zero ischemia was more frequent in the OPN (35.4% vs 15.5%, p=0.02). OPN was associated with more abdominal wall complications (31.2% vs 13.1%, p=0.004). Regarding oncologic outcomes, no differences were noted. The LPN group had less kidney function reduction at 3 (-5.2% vs -10%, p=0.04; CI 0.09 to 9.46) and 12 months after surgery (-0.8% vs -6.3%, p=0.02; CI 1.18 to 12.95), and a lower rate of downstaging on the chronic kidney disease classification at 12 months (14.1% vs 32.6%, p=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical and oncologic outcomes of LPN were similar to OPN. Minimally invasive surgery may provide better preservation of kidney function. More studies, especially those involving robotic surgery, are necessary to confirm our findings.

摘要

目的

部分肾切除术是治疗<7cm 肾肿瘤的标准治疗方法,微创手术的趋势有所增加。然而,支持其使用和获益的数据仍然缺乏。

材料和方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机对照试验,比较了接受开放性部分肾切除术(OPN)或腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)的患者的手术、功能和肿瘤学结果。OPN 或 LPN 治疗<7cm 肾肿瘤的患者按 1:1 随机分组。主要终点是手术后 90 天内的手术并发症。次要结局是比较手术、肿瘤学和功能结果。

结果

我们在 2012 年至 2020 年间随机分配了 208 例患者(OPN 组 110 例,LPN 组 98 例)。手术数据显示手术时间、热缺血时间、估计失血量、输血或住院时间无差异。OPN 组零缺血更为常见(35.4%比 15.5%,p=0.02)。OPN 组更常见腹壁并发症(31.2%比 13.1%,p=0.004)。关于肿瘤学结果,无差异。LPN 组术后 3 个月(-5.2%比-10%,p=0.04;CI 0.09 至 9.46)和 12 个月(-0.8%比-6.3%,p=0.02;CI 1.18 至 12.95)时肾功能下降更少,12 个月时慢性肾脏病分级降级率更低(14.1%比 32.6%,p=0.006)。

结论

LPN 的手术和肿瘤学结果与 OPN 相似。微创手术可能更好地保留肾功能。需要更多的研究,特别是涉及机器人手术的研究,以证实我们的发现。

相似文献

1
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing the Outcomes of Open vs Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy.一项比较开放与腹腔镜部分肾切除术疗效的前瞻性、随机试验。
J Urol. 2022 Aug;208(2):259-267. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002695. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience.连续患者中行腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:康奈尔大学的经验
BJU Int. 2005 Oct;96(6):811-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05718.x.
3
Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy provides better operative outcomes as compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches: results from a prospective cohort study.与腹腔镜和开放手术方法相比,机器人辅助部分肾切除术可提供更好的手术效果:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
J Robot Surg. 2017 Sep;11(3):333-339. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0660-2. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
4
Comparing Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Radio Frequency Ablation Assisted Tumor Enucleation and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1a Renal Tumor: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较零缺血腹腔镜射频消融辅助肿瘤剜除术与腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗 T1a 期肾癌:一项随机临床试验。
J Urol. 2016 Jun;195(6):1677-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.115. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
5
Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients.腹腔镜与开放肾部分切除术治疗 T1 期肾肿瘤:340 例患者长期肿瘤学和功能结局评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):281-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11280.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
6
Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:200例配对患者的比较
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.042. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
7
Mini-flank supra-12th rib incision for open partial nephrectomy compared with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and traditional open partial nephrectomy.与腹腔镜下部分肾切除术和传统开放性部分肾切除术相比,开放性部分肾切除术的迷你肋下第12肋上切口。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 21;9(2):e89155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089155. eCollection 2014.
8
Lower Incidence of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Than in Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.机器人辅助部分肾切除术术后急性肾损伤发生率低于开放部分肾切除术:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Endourol. 2020 Jul;34(7):754-762. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0622. Epub 2020 May 28.
9
Robotic partial nephrectomy is associated with a significantly decreased rate of postoperative pseudoaneurysm compared to open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.与开放性和腹腔镜部分肾切除术相比,机器人部分肾切除术术后假性动脉瘤的发生率明显降低。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 4;18(1):241. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01999-3.
10
A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy.机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放性部分肾切除术的比较。
JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):581-7. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882737177.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of Glomerular Filtration Rate Following Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma with Different Machine Learning Techniques.不同机器学习技术对局限性肾细胞癌行部分肾切除术后肾小球滤过率的预测
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 13;17(10):1647. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101647.
2
Robotic partial nephrectomy is associated with a lower incidence of urine leakage following nephron-sparing surgery for kidney tumors compared to open and laparoscopic approaches.与开放手术和腹腔镜手术相比,机器人辅助部分肾切除术在保留肾单位的肾肿瘤手术中尿漏发生率较低。
World J Urol. 2025 Apr 28;43(1):254. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05651-z.
3
Renal cell cancer treatment: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) surgery-focused consensus update.
肾细胞癌治疗:拉丁美洲肿瘤协作组(LACOG)和拉丁美洲肾癌组(LARCG)以手术为重点的共识更新
Ther Adv Urol. 2025 Apr 14;17:17562872241312581. doi: 10.1177/17562872241312581. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Complications and blood loss after invasive treatments for small renal masses A systematic review.小肾肿块侵入性治疗后的并发症与失血:一项系统评价
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 Apr;19(4):136-144. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8970.
5
Open versus mini-invasive partial and radical nephrectomy complications: results from the French national health database.开放与微创部分肾切除术和根治性肾切除术的并发症:来自法国国家健康数据库的结果。
BMC Urol. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01620-7.
6
Open versus Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy: Trends and Outcomes from a Wide National Population-Based Database.开放性与微创性部分肾切除术:基于全国广泛人群数据库的趋势与结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 14;13(18):5454. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185454.
7
Case - Inferior vena caval thrombus associated with a left-sided renal cell carcinoma during pregnancy.病例——孕期左侧肾细胞癌合并下腔静脉血栓形成
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Sep;18(9):E295-E297. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8730.
8
Oncologic outcomes and survival of modern surgical approaches for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).现代手术方法治疗胃胃肠间质瘤(GIST)的肿瘤学结果和生存情况。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6854-6864. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11152-8. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
9
Robotic partial nephrectomy is associated with a significantly decreased rate of postoperative pseudoaneurysm compared to open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.与开放性和腹腔镜部分肾切除术相比,机器人部分肾切除术术后假性动脉瘤的发生率明显降低。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 4;18(1):241. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01999-3.
10
Risk Factors of Open Surgery Conversion in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy to Achieve Nephron Sparing.腹腔镜肾部分切除术中转开放手术的肾部分切除术的风险因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3880-3886. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15106-1. Epub 2024 Mar 8.