Zeng Fanchun, Cao Quanfu, Fu Fengwen, Wang Bin, Sun Zhongyi
Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, School of Biomedical Engineering, Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Department of Urology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
World J Urol. 2024 Dec 11;43(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05355-w.
Circumcision is essential for male health, yet traditional methods are plagued by issues such as lengthy operative times, bleeding, and slow recovery. This study explores the application of biological welding technology in circumcision, assessing its potential as a safe and efficient novel surgical approach.
In this study, 24 male adult dogs were randomly divided into two groups. The biological welding group underwent circumcision using biological welding technology, while the control group received traditional cut-and-suture circumcision. Clinical indicators such as surgical time, blood loss, pathological changes, and recovery time were observed and compared.
The biological welding group had a significantly shorter surgical time compared to the control group (2.33 ± 0.55 min vs. 27.06 ± 5.77 min, p < 0.001). The control group had an average blood loss of 22.35 ± 5.17 ml, whereas the biological welding group experienced zero blood loss (p < 0.001). Recovery time was also significantly shorter in the biological welding group (12.33 ± 3.50 d vs. 16.50 ± 2.57 d, p = 0.004), with a lower incidence of postoperative complications. Pathological analysis indicated that the thermal injury range in the biological welding group was controlled within 2 mm.
Biological welding technology demonstrated advantages in circumcision, including short surgical time, no bleeding, minimal thermal damage, and rapid recovery, proving to be a safe and effective novel circumcision technique with potential clinical application value.
包皮环切术对男性健康至关重要,但传统方法存在手术时间长、出血和恢复缓慢等问题。本研究探讨生物焊接技术在包皮环切术中的应用,评估其作为一种安全有效的新型手术方法的潜力。
本研究将24只成年雄性犬随机分为两组。生物焊接组采用生物焊接技术进行包皮环切术,而对照组接受传统的切割缝合包皮环切术。观察并比较手术时间、失血量、病理变化和恢复时间等临床指标。
与对照组相比,生物焊接组的手术时间明显更短(2.33±0.55分钟对27.06±5.77分钟,p<0.001)。对照组平均失血量为22.35±5.17毫升,而生物焊接组失血量为零(p<0.001)。生物焊接组的恢复时间也明显更短(12.33±3.50天对16.50±2.57天,p = 0.004),术后并发症发生率更低。病理分析表明,生物焊接组的热损伤范围控制在2毫米以内。
生物焊接技术在包皮环切术中显示出优势,包括手术时间短、无出血、热损伤小和恢复快,被证明是一种具有潜在临床应用价值的安全有效的新型包皮环切技术。