Masache Amon, Mdlongwa Precious, Maposa Daniel, Sigauke Caston
Department of Statistics and Operations Research, National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Limpopo, Sovenga, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 11;19(12):e0312814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312814. eCollection 2024.
The renewable energy industry requires accurate forecasts of intermittent solar irradiance (SI) to effectively manage solar power generation and supply. Introducing the random forests (RFs) model and its hybridisation with quantile regression modelling, the quantile regression random forest (QRRF), can help improve the forecasts' accuracy. This paper assesses the RFs and QRRF models against the quantile generalised additive model (QGAM) by evaluating their forecast performances. A simulation study of multivariate data-generating processes was carried out to compare the forecasting accuracy of the models when predicting global horizontal solar irradiance. The QRRF and QGAM are completely new forecasting frameworks for SI studies, to the best of our knowledge. Simulation results suggested that the introduced QRRF compared well with the QGAM when predicting the forecast distribution. However, the evaluations of the pinball loss scores and mean absolute scaled errors demonstrated a clear superiority of the QGAM. Similar results were obtained in an application to real-life data. Therefore, we recommend that the QGAM be preferred ahead of decision tree-based models when predicting solar irradiance. However, the QRRF model can be used alternatively to predict the forecast distribution. Both the QGAM and QRRF modelling frameworks went beyond representing forecast uncertainty of SI as probability distributions around a prediction interval to give complete information through the estimation of quantiles. Most SI studies conducted are residual and/or non-parametric modelling that are limited to represent information about the conditional mean distribution. Extensions of the QRRF and QGAM frameworks can be made to model other renewable sources of energy that have meteorological characteristics similar to solar irradiance.
可再生能源行业需要准确预测间歇性太阳辐照度(SI),以便有效地管理太阳能发电和供应。引入随机森林(RFs)模型及其与分位数回归建模的混合模型——分位数回归随机森林(QRRF),有助于提高预测的准确性。本文通过评估随机森林模型和分位数回归随机森林模型的预测性能,将它们与分位数广义相加模型(QGAM)进行了比较。开展了一项多变量数据生成过程的模拟研究,以比较这些模型在预测全球水平太阳辐照度时的预测准确性。据我们所知,分位数回归随机森林和分位数广义相加模型是太阳辐照度研究中全新的预测框架。模拟结果表明,在预测预测分布时,引入的分位数回归随机森林与分位数广义相加模型表现相当。然而,弹球损失分数和平均绝对尺度误差的评估结果表明,分位数广义相加模型具有明显优势。在应用于实际数据时也得到了类似结果。因此,我们建议在预测太阳辐照度时,优先选择分位数广义相加模型而非基于决策树的模型。不过,分位数回归随机森林模型可用于预测预测分布。分位数广义相加模型和分位数回归随机森林建模框架都不仅仅是将太阳辐照度的预测不确定性表示为围绕预测区间的概率分布,而是通过分位数估计提供完整信息。大多数已开展的太阳辐照度研究都是残差和/或非参数建模,仅限于表示关于条件均值分布的信息。分位数回归随机森林和分位数广义相加模型框架可以扩展,以对其他具有与太阳辐照度相似气象特征的可再生能源进行建模。