Daly Kelly A, Diaz-Gutierrez Kiara A, Beheshtian Armon, Heyman Richard E, Smith Slep Amy M, Wolff Mark S
Center for Oral Health Policy & Management, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, New York, United States of America.
University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Dec 11;3(12):e0000690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000690. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Although several brief cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)-based treatments for dental fear have proven efficacious, these interventions remain largely unavailable outside of the specialty clinics in which they were developed. Leveraging technology, we sought to increase access to treatment for individuals with dental fear through the development of a mobile application (Dental FearLess).
To assess the resonance of our app as an avenue for dental fear treatment, we conducted a study assessing the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of the beta app. Participants with moderate to severe dental fear (N = 80) completed the app and reported on the perceived usability of the mobile interface (Systems Usability Scale, SUS; α = .82) and credibility of the intervention (Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire, CEQ; α = .88). A sub-sample of participants naïve to the app (n = 10) completed the app during a think-aloud procedure, sharing their candid thoughts and reactions while using the app, prior to reporting on usability and credibility metrics.
Overall usability (M = 78.5, SD = 17.7) and credibility (M = 21.7, SD = 5.5) of the beta version of the app were good. The think-aloud data further corroborated the app's acceptability, while highlighting several areas for user improvement (i.e., aesthetics, navigation, engagement).
Usability and acceptability results are promising for the viability of an accessible, feasible, self-administered intervention for dental fear. Refinements made based on user feedback have produced a clinical-trial-ready mobile application. App refinement decisions, informed by user feedback, are representative of the larger literature-that is, of the ubiquitous negotiations m-health developers must make across treatment fidelity, usability, and engagement. Implications for future research are discussed.
尽管几种基于简短认知行为疗法(CBT)的牙科恐惧治疗方法已被证明有效,但这些干预措施在其开发的专科诊所之外基本上无法获得。我们利用技术,试图通过开发一款移动应用程序(Dental FearLess)来增加牙科恐惧患者获得治疗的机会。
为了评估我们的应用程序作为牙科恐惧治疗途径的反响,我们开展了一项研究,评估该测试版应用程序的可用性、可行性和可接受性。患有中度至重度牙科恐惧的参与者(N = 80)使用了该应用程序,并报告了对移动界面的感知可用性(系统可用性量表,SUS;α = 0.82)和干预措施的可信度(可信度与期望问卷,CEQ;α = 0.88)。对该应用程序不了解的参与者子样本(n = 10)在出声思考过程中使用了该应用程序,在报告可用性和可信度指标之前,分享他们在使用应用程序时的真实想法和反应。
该应用程序测试版的总体可用性(M = 78.5,标准差 = 17.7)和可信度(M = 21.7,标准差 = 5.5)良好。出声思考数据进一步证实了该应用程序的可接受性,同时突出了几个需要改进用户体验的方面(即美学、导航、参与度)。
可用性和可接受性结果对于一种可获取、可行的牙科恐惧自我管理干预措施的可行性很有前景。根据用户反馈进行的改进已经产生了一个可用于临床试验的移动应用程序。由用户反馈提供信息的应用程序改进决策代表了更广泛的文献,也就是说,代表了移动健康开发者在治疗保真度、可用性和参与度方面必须进行的普遍权衡。讨论了对未来研究的启示。