Diehl Joseph, Camacho Nicolas, Smoski Moria
Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 11;19(12):e0311733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311733. eCollection 2024.
Mind-wandering is an essential cognitive process in which people engage for 30-50% of their waking day and is highly associated with neuroticism. The current study identified the factor structure of retrospective self-report items related to mind-wandering and perseverative cognition content and explored these associations with neuroticism. In an adult community sample (N = 309), items from the NYC Cognition Questionnaire, the Penn State Worry Questionnaire Short Form, and the Rumination Responses Brooding Subscale were entered into factor analyses to test the optimal factor structure of these items. We employed a structural model to investigate associations of mind-wandering facets with neuroticism. A correlated three factor solution best fit the data (CFI = .94, TLI = .93, SRMR = .07, RMSEA = .07). Bifactor models failed to provide evidence for a general mind-wandering construct above and beyond variance explained by mind-wandering and perseverative cognition facets. The structural model revealed differential associations of each facet with neuroticism. A wandering mind is not always an unhappy mind. Whereas worry and rumination are associated with higher levels of neuroticism, mind-wandering has other components that relate to positively valenced cognition and lower neuroticism. Adaptive and maladaptive mind-wandering should be tested together in future studies of personality and psychopathology.
走神是一种重要的认知过程,人们在清醒时的30%-50%都会经历走神,且走神与神经质高度相关。本研究确定了与走神和固执性认知内容相关的回顾性自我报告项目的因素结构,并探讨了这些因素与神经质的关联。在一个成人社区样本(N = 309)中,将来自纽约市认知问卷、宾夕法尼亚州立大学忧虑问卷简版和沉思反应沉思分量表的项目进行因素分析,以检验这些项目的最佳因素结构。我们采用结构模型来研究走神各方面与神经质的关联。一个相关的三因素解决方案最符合数据(CFI = 0.94,TLI = 0.93,SRMR = 0.07,RMSEA = 0.07)。双因素模型未能提供证据证明存在一个除走神和固执性认知方面所解释的方差之外的一般走神结构。结构模型揭示了每个方面与神经质的不同关联。思绪飘荡并不总是意味着心情不佳。忧虑和沉思与较高水平的神经质相关,而走神还有其他与积极情绪认知和较低神经质相关的成分。在未来关于人格和精神病理学的研究中,应同时检验适应性和适应不良性走神。