Couch N P, Clowes A W, Whittemore A D, Lombara J A, Henderson B A, Mannick J A
Surgery. 1985 Jan;97(1):83-7.
The results of ilioiliac and iliofemoral bypass grafts were compared with those for aortic-origin grafts in 205 patients and 332 legs operated upon for aortoiliac occlusive disease since 1972. Poor-risk patients who had a patent distal aorta and at least one functionally patent proximal iliac artery were considered for reconstruction with the iliac artery used for the proximal anastomosis. The procedure, performed through a retroperitoneal approach, has several technical advantages and is especially satisfactory for patients who would otherwise have an axillofemoral graft. The data indicate that these iliac-origin reconstructions compare favorably in patency with aortic-origin reconstructions or with other "extra-anatomic" arterial reconstructions, enabling extremely low morbidity and mortality rates even in high-risk patients.
自1972年以来,对205例接受主髂动脉闭塞性疾病手术的患者的332条腿,比较了髂-髂和髂-股旁路移植术与主动脉起源移植术的结果。对那些远端主动脉通畅且至少有一条功能上通畅的近端髂动脉的高危患者,考虑用髂动脉进行近端吻合重建。该手术通过腹膜后入路进行,有几个技术优点,对于那些否则将接受腋-股移植的患者尤其令人满意。数据表明,这些髂动脉起源的重建术在通畅率方面与主动脉起源的重建术或其他“解剖外”动脉重建术相比具有优势,即使在高危患者中也能实现极低的发病率和死亡率。