• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

器械性阴道分娩时的产科肛门括约肌损伤:基于 18 年真实世界数据的观察性研究。

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries during instrumental vaginal delivery: An observational study based on 18-years of real-world data.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.

Norwegian Research Centre for Women's Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BJOG. 2024 Dec;131(13):1824-1831. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17914. Epub 2024 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17914
PMID:39030798
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence and secular trends of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in vacuum and forceps deliveries in Norway, both with and without episiotomy.

DESIGN

Population-based real-world data collected during 2001-2018.

SETTING

Medical Birth Registry Norway.

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

Nulliparous women with singleton foetuses in a cephalic presentation delivered by either vacuum or forceps (n = 70 783).

METHODS

Logistic regression analyses were applied to the OASIS prevalence in six 3-year time periods. Both crude odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

OASIS prevalence.

RESULTS

The OASIS prevalence in vacuum and forceps deliveries decreased from 14.8% during 2001-2003 to 5.2% during 2016-2018. The overall reduction between the first and last 3-year time period was 61% (aOR = 0.39, 95% CIs = 0.35-0.43). The only exception to this decreasing trend in OASIS was found in forceps deliveries performed without an episiotomy. The OASIS prevalence was approximately twofold higher in forceps compared to vacuum deliveries (aOR = 1.92, 95% CIs = 1.79-2.05). Performing either a mediolateral or lateral episiotomy was associated with a 45% decrease in the prevalence of OASIS relative to no episiotomy (aOR = 0.55, 95% CIs = 0.52-0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Opting for vacuum rather than forceps delivery in conjunction with a mediolateral or lateral episiotomy could significantly lower the OASIS prevalence in nulliparous women.

摘要

目的

确定挪威在有无会阴切开术的情况下,真空吸引和产钳分娩中产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)的流行率和趋势。

设计

2001-2018 年期间收集的基于人群的真实世界数据。

设置

挪威医学出生登记处。

人群或样本

头位、初产、单胎的女性,使用真空吸引或产钳分娩(n=70783)。

方法

应用逻辑回归分析了六个 3 年时间间隔的 OASIS 患病率。确定了粗比值比和调整比值比(aOR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。

主要结局测量

OASIS 患病率。

结果

在真空吸引和产钳分娩中,OASIS 的患病率从 2001-2003 年的 14.8%下降到 2016-2018 年的 5.2%。在第一个和最后一个 3 年时间间隔之间,总体减少了 61%(aOR=0.39,95%CI=0.35-0.43)。唯一例外的是,无会阴切开术的产钳分娩中 OASIS 的下降趋势。与真空吸引相比,产钳分娩中 OASIS 的患病率大约高出两倍(aOR=1.92,95%CI=1.79-2.05)。行正中切开术或侧方切开术与不切开相比,OASIS 的患病率降低了 45%(aOR=0.55,95%CI=0.52-0.58)。

结论

在初产妇中,选择真空吸引而不是产钳分娩,并辅以正中切开术或侧方切开术,可能会显著降低 OASIS 的患病率。

相似文献

1
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries during instrumental vaginal delivery: An observational study based on 18-years of real-world data.器械性阴道分娩时的产科肛门括约肌损伤:基于 18 年真实世界数据的观察性研究。
BJOG. 2024 Dec;131(13):1824-1831. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17914. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
2
The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry.会阴侧切术在预防阴道助产分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤中的有效性:一项基于国家登记处的十年分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
3
Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates among primiparous women with different modes of vaginal delivery.不同阴道分娩方式的初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤率。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Dec;131(3):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.025. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
4
Impact of Episiotomy During Operative Vaginal Delivery on Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries.手术阴道分娩时会阴切开术对产科肛门括约肌损伤的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Dec;41(12):1734-1741. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
5
Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations.产科肛门括约肌裂伤的危险因素。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(4):304-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1297-2. Epub 2005 Apr 5.
6
Obstetric anal sphincter injury after episiotomy in vacuum extraction: an epidemiological study using an emulated randomised trial approach.会阴侧切后真空吸引助产致产科肛门括约肌损伤:采用模拟随机试验方法的流行病学研究。
BJOG. 2021 Sep;128(10):1663-1671. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16663. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
7
The association between episiotomy or OASIS at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women and subsequent prelabor cesarean delivery: A nationwide observational study.在初产妇中,会阴切开术或真空吸引助产时发生 OASIS 与随后的计划性剖宫产分娩之间的关联:一项全国性观察性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Mar;102(3):378-388. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14513. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
8
Evaluation of Suzor forceps training by studying obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a retrospective study.通过研究产科肛门括约肌损伤评估苏佐尔产钳训练:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03358-0.
9
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries among women with gestational diabetes and women without gestational diabetes: A NSW population-based cohort study.妊娠期糖尿病女性与非妊娠期糖尿病女性的产科肛门括约肌损伤:一项基于新南威尔士州人群的队列研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Oct;59(5):662-669. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12950. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
10
Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.会阴侧切术可降低阴道助产分娩时肛门括约肌损伤的风险。
BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(1):104-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01554.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A Care Bundle Aiming to Reduce the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Survey of Women's Experiences.旨在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤风险的护理包:女性体验调查
BJOG. 2025 Apr;132(5):588-595. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18029. Epub 2024 Dec 11.