• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体等级制度背景下的闪光灯记忆:性别、系统正当性和社会支配取向对负面个人和公众闪光灯记忆的影响。

Flashbulb memories in the context of group hierarchies: effects of gender, system justification, and social dominance orientation on negative private and public flashbulb memories.

作者信息

Çavuşoğlu Merve, Kuşdil Muharrem Ersin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Türkiye.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1488241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1488241. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1488241
PMID:39664638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11633235/
Abstract

Research on flashbulb memories (FBMs) has primarily focused on cognitive aspects. However, recent studies indicate that FBMs are closely associated with social and cultural dynamics. This descriptive study explored the structural aspects and psychosocial functions of negative FBMs within the context of intergroup theories, mainly focusing on negative public (coup attempt in Türkiye on July 15, 2016) and private (bad news of a loved one) FBMs. Participants in the main study ( = 233) were selected and grouped based on their social dominance orientations (SDO; high and low groups) and system justification tendencies (SJT; high and low groups), using data from a preliminary survey ( = 1,113). In the main study, participants' responses to items on canonical categories, phenomenological aspects, and psychosocial functions of FBMs and their involvement in different protest actions against the coup attempt were compared considering SDO, SJT, and gender. The results show that private FBMs were generally rated higher by participants than public FBMs in all aspects. Although the canonical quality of private FBM did not differ between gender groups, public FBM quality was better in men. Participants in the high-SJT group had higher-quality public FBMs and rated these memories as more functional than participants in the low-SJT group, along with their high levels of protest participation. No differences were observed between the SDO groups for either type of FBM. The findings are discussed in terms of their relevance to group hierarchies and system justification motives. As the first attempt to place the FBM phenomenon in the context of SDO and SJT at the individual level, this study is intended to encourage others to adopt multi-level intergroup theories for integrating bottom-up and top-down processes.

摘要

关于闪光灯记忆(FBMs)的研究主要集中在认知方面。然而,最近的研究表明,闪光灯记忆与社会和文化动态密切相关。这项描述性研究在群体间理论的背景下探讨了负面闪光灯记忆的结构方面和心理社会功能,主要关注负面的公众(2016年7月15日土耳其政变企图)和私人(亲人的坏消息)闪光灯记忆。主要研究的参与者(n = 233)根据他们的社会支配取向(SDO;高分组和低分组)和系统正当化倾向(SJT;高分组和低分组)进行选择和分组,使用的是初步调查(n = 1113)的数据。在主要研究中,考虑到SDO、SJT和性别,比较了参与者对闪光灯记忆的典型类别、现象学方面和心理社会功能项目的回答,以及他们参与针对政变企图的不同抗议行动的情况。结果表明,在所有方面,参与者对私人闪光灯记忆的评价普遍高于公众闪光灯记忆。虽然私人闪光灯记忆的典型质量在不同性别组之间没有差异,但公众闪光灯记忆的质量在男性中更好。高SJT组的参与者有更高质量的公众闪光灯记忆,并认为这些记忆比低SJT组的参与者更具功能性,同时他们的抗议参与程度也更高。对于两种类型的闪光灯记忆,SDO组之间没有观察到差异。研究结果从其与群体等级制度和系统正当化动机的相关性方面进行了讨论。作为首次将闪光灯记忆现象置于个体层面的SDO和SJT背景下的尝试,本研究旨在鼓励其他人采用多层次的群体间理论来整合自下而上和自上而下的过程。

相似文献

1
Flashbulb memories in the context of group hierarchies: effects of gender, system justification, and social dominance orientation on negative private and public flashbulb memories.群体等级制度背景下的闪光灯记忆:性别、系统正当性和社会支配取向对负面个人和公众闪光灯记忆的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1488241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1488241. eCollection 2024.
2
Flashbulb and first-hand memories for campus closings due to COVID-19: consistency and change.因新冠疫情导致校园关闭的闪光灯记忆和第一手记忆:一致性与变化
Memory. 2024 Sep 18:1-16. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2404499.
3
Michael Jackson, Bin Laden and I: functions of positive and negative, public and private flashbulb memories.迈克尔·杰克逊、本·拉丹与我:正负性、公众与私人闪光灯记忆的作用
Memory. 2015;23(4):487-506. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.907428. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
4
Flashbulb Memories.闪光灯记忆
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2016 Feb 1;25(1):36-41. doi: 10.1177/0963721415622487.
5
Flashbulb memory: referring back to Brown and Kulik's definition.闪光灯记忆:参照布朗和库里克的定义。
Memory. 2020 Jul;28(6):766-782. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1778035. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
The flashbulb-like nature of memory for the first COVID-19 case and the impact of the emergency. A cross-national survey.对首例 COVID-19 病例的记忆犹如闪光灯,以及紧急情况的影响。一项跨国调查。
Memory. 2024 Feb;32(2):264-282. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2310554. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
7
Memory footprint: Predictors of flashbulb and event memories of the 2016 Euro Cup final.内存占用:2016年欧洲杯决赛闪光灯记忆和事件记忆的预测因素。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 21;14:1116747. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116747. eCollection 2023.
8
The emotional and reconstructive determinants of emotional memories: an experimental approach to flashbulb memory investigation.情绪记忆的情绪和重建决定因素:闪光灯记忆研究的实验方法。
Memory. 2010 Jul;18(5):473-85. doi: 10.1080/09658211003762076. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
9
Flashbulb memories of the Pope's resignation: explicit and implicit measures across differing religious groups.对教皇辞职的闪光灯记忆:不同宗教群体的显性和隐性测量
Memory. 2015;23(4):529-44. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.908923. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
Measuring the flashbulb-like nature of memories for private events: the flashbulb memory checklist.衡量个人事件记忆的闪光灯效应:闪光灯记忆清单
Memory. 2018 Sep;26(8):1053-1064. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1428348. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
A day that America will remember: flashbulb memory, collective memory, and future thinking for the capitol riots.一个美国将铭记的日子:闪光灯记忆、集体记忆和对国会暴乱的未来思考。
Memory. 2023 May;31(5):715-731. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2190570. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Collective memories serve similar functions to autobiographical memories.集体记忆与自传式记忆有着相似的功能。
Memory. 2023 Mar;31(3):316-327. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2154804. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Remembering Election Night 2016: Subjective but not objective metrics of autobiographical memory vary with political affiliation, affective valence, and surprise.记住 2016 年选举之夜:自传体记忆的主观而非客观指标随政治派别、情感效价和惊讶程度而变化。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Feb;151(2):390-409. doi: 10.1037/xge0001080. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
4
Memory bias for social hierarchical information is modulated by perceived social rank.对社会层级信息的记忆偏差受感知社会地位的调节。
Memory. 2022 May;30(5):650-657. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2029902. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
Memory of the U.K.'s 2016 EU referendum: The effects of valence on the long-term measures of a public event.对英国2016年脱欧公投的记忆:效价对公共事件长期衡量指标的影响。
Emotion. 2023 Feb;23(1):52-74. doi: 10.1037/emo0000788. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
6
Consistency and social identification: a test-retest study of flashbulb memories collected on the day of the 2016 Brussels bombings.一致性和社会认同:对 2016 年布鲁塞尔爆炸事件当天收集的闪光灯记忆进行的重测研究。
Memory. 2021 Mar;29(3):305-318. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1891253. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
7
Remembering the big game: social identity and memory for media events.记住重大赛事:社会认同与媒体事件记忆。
Memory. 2020 Jul;28(6):795-814. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1784232. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
8
Identifying distinct sets of predictors of specific functions of autobiographical memory.识别自传体记忆特定功能的不同预测因子集。
Memory. 2019 Oct;27(9):1313-1318. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1639759. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
9
Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review.理解怀旧高峰:系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 11;13(12):e0208595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208595. eCollection 2018.
10
Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective.从心理学角度看集体记忆
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 May;22(5):438-451. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.010.