Suppr超能文献

群体等级制度背景下的闪光灯记忆:性别、系统正当性和社会支配取向对负面个人和公众闪光灯记忆的影响。

Flashbulb memories in the context of group hierarchies: effects of gender, system justification, and social dominance orientation on negative private and public flashbulb memories.

作者信息

Çavuşoğlu Merve, Kuşdil Muharrem Ersin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Türkiye.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1488241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1488241. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Research on flashbulb memories (FBMs) has primarily focused on cognitive aspects. However, recent studies indicate that FBMs are closely associated with social and cultural dynamics. This descriptive study explored the structural aspects and psychosocial functions of negative FBMs within the context of intergroup theories, mainly focusing on negative public (coup attempt in Türkiye on July 15, 2016) and private (bad news of a loved one) FBMs. Participants in the main study ( = 233) were selected and grouped based on their social dominance orientations (SDO; high and low groups) and system justification tendencies (SJT; high and low groups), using data from a preliminary survey ( = 1,113). In the main study, participants' responses to items on canonical categories, phenomenological aspects, and psychosocial functions of FBMs and their involvement in different protest actions against the coup attempt were compared considering SDO, SJT, and gender. The results show that private FBMs were generally rated higher by participants than public FBMs in all aspects. Although the canonical quality of private FBM did not differ between gender groups, public FBM quality was better in men. Participants in the high-SJT group had higher-quality public FBMs and rated these memories as more functional than participants in the low-SJT group, along with their high levels of protest participation. No differences were observed between the SDO groups for either type of FBM. The findings are discussed in terms of their relevance to group hierarchies and system justification motives. As the first attempt to place the FBM phenomenon in the context of SDO and SJT at the individual level, this study is intended to encourage others to adopt multi-level intergroup theories for integrating bottom-up and top-down processes.

摘要

关于闪光灯记忆(FBMs)的研究主要集中在认知方面。然而,最近的研究表明,闪光灯记忆与社会和文化动态密切相关。这项描述性研究在群体间理论的背景下探讨了负面闪光灯记忆的结构方面和心理社会功能,主要关注负面的公众(2016年7月15日土耳其政变企图)和私人(亲人的坏消息)闪光灯记忆。主要研究的参与者(n = 233)根据他们的社会支配取向(SDO;高分组和低分组)和系统正当化倾向(SJT;高分组和低分组)进行选择和分组,使用的是初步调查(n = 1113)的数据。在主要研究中,考虑到SDO、SJT和性别,比较了参与者对闪光灯记忆的典型类别、现象学方面和心理社会功能项目的回答,以及他们参与针对政变企图的不同抗议行动的情况。结果表明,在所有方面,参与者对私人闪光灯记忆的评价普遍高于公众闪光灯记忆。虽然私人闪光灯记忆的典型质量在不同性别组之间没有差异,但公众闪光灯记忆的质量在男性中更好。高SJT组的参与者有更高质量的公众闪光灯记忆,并认为这些记忆比低SJT组的参与者更具功能性,同时他们的抗议参与程度也更高。对于两种类型的闪光灯记忆,SDO组之间没有观察到差异。研究结果从其与群体等级制度和系统正当化动机的相关性方面进行了讨论。作为首次将闪光灯记忆现象置于个体层面的SDO和SJT背景下的尝试,本研究旨在鼓励其他人采用多层次的群体间理论来整合自下而上和自上而下的过程。

相似文献

3
Michael Jackson, Bin Laden and I: functions of positive and negative, public and private flashbulb memories.
Memory. 2015;23(4):487-506. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.907428. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
4
Flashbulb Memories.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2016 Feb 1;25(1):36-41. doi: 10.1177/0963721415622487.
5
Flashbulb memory: referring back to Brown and Kulik's definition.
Memory. 2020 Jul;28(6):766-782. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1778035. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
The flashbulb-like nature of memory for the first COVID-19 case and the impact of the emergency. A cross-national survey.
Memory. 2024 Feb;32(2):264-282. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2310554. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
7
Memory footprint: Predictors of flashbulb and event memories of the 2016 Euro Cup final.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 21;14:1116747. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116747. eCollection 2023.
9
Flashbulb memories of the Pope's resignation: explicit and implicit measures across differing religious groups.
Memory. 2015;23(4):529-44. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.908923. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
10
Measuring the flashbulb-like nature of memories for private events: the flashbulb memory checklist.
Memory. 2018 Sep;26(8):1053-1064. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1428348. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
A day that America will remember: flashbulb memory, collective memory, and future thinking for the capitol riots.
Memory. 2023 May;31(5):715-731. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2190570. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Collective memories serve similar functions to autobiographical memories.
Memory. 2023 Mar;31(3):316-327. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2154804. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
4
Memory bias for social hierarchical information is modulated by perceived social rank.
Memory. 2022 May;30(5):650-657. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2029902. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
Memory of the U.K.'s 2016 EU referendum: The effects of valence on the long-term measures of a public event.
Emotion. 2023 Feb;23(1):52-74. doi: 10.1037/emo0000788. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
Remembering the big game: social identity and memory for media events.
Memory. 2020 Jul;28(6):795-814. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1784232. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
8
Identifying distinct sets of predictors of specific functions of autobiographical memory.
Memory. 2019 Oct;27(9):1313-1318. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1639759. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
9
Understanding the reminiscence bump: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 11;13(12):e0208595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208595. eCollection 2018.
10
Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 May;22(5):438-451. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验