Suppr超能文献

记住 2016 年选举之夜:自传体记忆的主观而非客观指标随政治派别、情感效价和惊讶程度而变化。

Remembering Election Night 2016: Subjective but not objective metrics of autobiographical memory vary with political affiliation, affective valence, and surprise.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Denver.

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Feb;151(2):390-409. doi: 10.1037/xge0001080. Epub 2021 Jul 26.

Abstract

Flashbulb memories represent a unique phenomenon linking research on cognition with research on emotion, yet most studies on this phenomenon have characterized collective events that are negative and unexpected in nature. In contrast, the 2016 American election of Donald Trump was a public, culturally shared event, eliciting extreme emotional responses that were positive for some individuals but negative for others, as well as varying levels of surprise. We longitudinally evaluated autobiographical memories for Election Night 2016 in a large online sample of Clinton supporters, Trump supporters, and third-party/nonvoters over a 12-month period, in terms of both objective memory metrics (information quantity and memory consistency) and subjective memory metrics (including memory confidence, metacognition, and sensory experience). Emotional responses to the election outcome varied widely, with Clinton supporters reporting highly negative responses, Trump supporters reporting highly positive responses, and third-party/nonvoters reporting mildly negative responses. Emotional intensity was enhanced in surprised versus nonsurprised individuals. Relative to third-party/nonvoters, Clinton and Trump supporters reported greater memory vividness, event importance, and sensory experience. Additionally, limited valence effects on subjective memory were observed (including higher memory confidence in Trump supporters and higher memory rehearsal in Clinton supporters). These differences in subjective experience were observed despite similar levels of information quantity and consistency as a function of valence. This characterization of memories for surprising positive events suggests they share many of the paradoxical qualities of memories for negative events often discussed as "flashbulb memories" but also points to potential differences in memory phenomenology for personal versus collectively experienced events. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

闪光灯记忆是一种将认知研究与情感研究联系起来的独特现象,但大多数关于这一现象的研究都将其特征描述为负面和意外的集体事件。相比之下,2016 年唐纳德·特朗普在美国的选举是一个公开的、文化共享的事件,引发了一些人积极、另一些人消极的极端情绪反应,以及不同程度的惊讶。我们在一个大型的在线样本中,对 2016 年选举之夜的自传体记忆进行了为期 12 个月的纵向评估,该样本包括克林顿的支持者、特朗普的支持者以及第三方/不投票者,涉及客观记忆指标(信息量和记忆一致性)和主观记忆指标(包括记忆信心、元认知和感官体验)。对选举结果的情绪反应差异很大,克林顿的支持者报告了非常负面的反应,特朗普的支持者报告了非常积极的反应,第三方/不投票者报告了轻微的负面反应。与不惊讶的人相比,惊讶的人情绪强度更高。与第三方/不投票者相比,克林顿和特朗普的支持者报告了更高的记忆生动性、事件重要性和感官体验。此外,还观察到主观记忆的有限效价效应(包括特朗普支持者的记忆信心更高,克林顿支持者的记忆排练更高)。尽管信息数量和一致性的效价相似,但观察到了这些主观体验的差异。这种对令人惊讶的积极事件的记忆的描述表明,它们与作为“闪光灯记忆”经常讨论的负面事件的记忆有许多相似的矛盾特征,但也表明了个人和集体经历的事件在记忆现象学上的潜在差异。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验