• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情感作为立场:波兰和德国议会辩论视听记录中的多模态立场表达

Affectivity as stance: multimodal stance-taking in audiovisual documentations of Polish and German parliamentary debates.

作者信息

Müller Cornelia, Karpiński Maciej, Kindler-Mathôt Clara, Klessa Katarzyna, Jarmołowicz-Nowikow Ewa, Junge Jana Katharina, Papadopoulou Katerina, Sawicka-Stępińska Brygida

机构信息

Faculty of Social and Cultural Sciences, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany.

Faculty of Modern Languages and Literature, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1467185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1467185. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1467185
PMID:39664640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11631604/
Abstract

This paper presents a media-aesthetic framework to study affectivity as a stance. This framework opens up a new perspective on multimodal affective stance-taking in the context of specific media ecologies. It exemplifies this new approach with case studies of the official audiovisual documentation of political debates in the German Bundestag and the Polish Sejm. This new approach addresses the intertwining of audiovisual multimodality with verbo-gestural expressivity (or the multimodality of speaking). Adopting a phenomenological position, we are interested in how the orchestration of the debates as audiovisual events moves the spectators. The concepts 'Expressive Movement' and 'Dynamic Forms of Vitality' serve as theoretical and methodological references to capture the affective dynamics of audiovisual debates and how these audiovisual images modulate the perceptions and experiences of the spectators. To illustrate and substantiate this approach for linguistic and media analyses of affective stance-taking, the paper outlines basic assumptions and methods. It offers two exemplary case studies from German and Polish parliamentary debates. It is concluded that bringing together media-aesthetic with linguistic analyses of multimodal communication and interaction provides not only a valid starting point for future research of multimodal stance-taking in different media ecologies but also allows researchers to address how and why spectators of audiovisual media performances are moved affectively.

摘要

本文提出了一个媒介美学框架,将情感作为一种立场来研究。该框架在特定媒介生态环境下,为多模态情感立场表达开辟了新视角。文中以德国联邦议院和波兰众议院政治辩论的官方视听记录为例,阐释了这种新方法。这种新方法探讨了视听多模态与言语手势表现力(即言语的多模态)的交织。我们从现象学角度出发,关注作为视听事件的辩论编排如何打动观众。“表现性运动”和“活力动态形式”这两个概念作为理论和方法参考,用以捕捉视听辩论的情感动态,以及这些视听图像如何调节观众的感知和体验。为说明并证实这种情感立场表达的语言和媒介分析方法,本文概述了基本假设和方法。文中提供了来自德国和波兰议会辩论的两个典型案例研究。研究得出结论,将媒介美学与多模态传播和互动的语言分析相结合,不仅为未来不同媒介生态下多模态立场表达的研究提供了有效起点,还能让研究人员探讨视听媒体表演的观众如何以及为何会被情感打动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/11b6147db10c/fpsyg-15-1467185-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/049434ed1fb1/fpsyg-15-1467185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/4c1c73bfd1bd/fpsyg-15-1467185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/fc0dd43ab68d/fpsyg-15-1467185-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/3137ddb0c902/fpsyg-15-1467185-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/aab204644e0f/fpsyg-15-1467185-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/41f3d99c2d56/fpsyg-15-1467185-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/8b65f65b256d/fpsyg-15-1467185-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/cdbcbaddebe2/fpsyg-15-1467185-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/058be99dedf0/fpsyg-15-1467185-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/9d6b66b4b2e2/fpsyg-15-1467185-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/3dff2a8108e7/fpsyg-15-1467185-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/ac97226ebc13/fpsyg-15-1467185-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/8f8014c5c275/fpsyg-15-1467185-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/bd1103e799fd/fpsyg-15-1467185-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/11b6147db10c/fpsyg-15-1467185-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/049434ed1fb1/fpsyg-15-1467185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/4c1c73bfd1bd/fpsyg-15-1467185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/fc0dd43ab68d/fpsyg-15-1467185-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/3137ddb0c902/fpsyg-15-1467185-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/aab204644e0f/fpsyg-15-1467185-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/41f3d99c2d56/fpsyg-15-1467185-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/8b65f65b256d/fpsyg-15-1467185-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/cdbcbaddebe2/fpsyg-15-1467185-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/058be99dedf0/fpsyg-15-1467185-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/9d6b66b4b2e2/fpsyg-15-1467185-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/3dff2a8108e7/fpsyg-15-1467185-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/ac97226ebc13/fpsyg-15-1467185-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/8f8014c5c275/fpsyg-15-1467185-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/bd1103e799fd/fpsyg-15-1467185-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e442/11631604/11b6147db10c/fpsyg-15-1467185-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
Affectivity as stance: multimodal stance-taking in audiovisual documentations of Polish and German parliamentary debates.情感作为立场:波兰和德国议会辩论视听记录中的多模态立场表达
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1467185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1467185. eCollection 2024.
2
"That was really a productive segment, wasn't it?" Nonverbal markers of humor in the American presidential debates of 2016 and 2020.“那真的是一个富有成效的环节,不是吗?”2016年和2020年美国总统辩论中的幽默非语言标志。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 8;15:1453168. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1453168. eCollection 2024.
3
Embodied sharpness: exploring the slicing gesture in political talk shows.具身锐度:探索政治脱口秀中的切片手势
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 6;15:1494192. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1494192. eCollection 2024.
4
Role-theoretic discourse analysis of German security policy: a case of German parliamentary debate on the mission in Afghanistan.德国安全政策的角色理论话语分析:以德国议会关于阿富汗任务的辩论为例。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 9;14:1329151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1329151. eCollection 2023.
5
Mocking enactments: a case study of multimodal stance-stacking.模仿表演:多模态姿态叠加的案例研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 2;15:1379593. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1379593. eCollection 2024.
6
How is emotional resonance achieved in storytellings of sadness/distress?在悲伤/痛苦的故事讲述中,如何实现情感共鸣?
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:952119. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952119. eCollection 2022.
7
Visuo-Kinetic Signs Are Inherently Metonymic: How Embodied Metonymy Motivates Forms, Functions, and Schematic Patterns in Gesture.视觉运动符号本质上是转喻的:具身转喻如何激发手势中的形式、功能和图式模式。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 27;10:254. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00254. eCollection 2019.
8
A multimodal parallel architecture: A cognitive framework for multimodal interactions.一种多模态并行架构:多模态交互的认知框架。
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:304-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
9
Decoding Prosodic Information from Motion Capture Data: The Gravity of Co-Speech Gestures.从动作捕捉数据中解码韵律信息:协同言语手势的重要性
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Apr 29;9:652-664. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00196. eCollection 2025.
10
The effect of gesture expressivity on emotional resonance in storytelling interaction.手势表现力对故事讲述互动中情感共鸣的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 27;15:1477263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1477263. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
In the eye of the beholder? Universality and cultural specificity in the expression and perception of emotion.在观察者眼中?情感表达和感知中的普遍性和文化特殊性。
Int J Psychol. 2011 Dec;46(6):401-35. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.626049.
2
Facial expressions of emotion: an old controversy and new findings.情绪的面部表情:一个古老的争议与新发现
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jan 29;335(1273):63-9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0008.