Nocini Riccardo, Pinto Valentina, Contu Luca, De Santis Giorgio, Pignatti Marco
Ear, Nose and Throat, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynaecology and Paediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Plastic Surgery, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
J Hand Microsurg. 2024 Nov 20;17(1):100179. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2024.100179. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Caliber mismatch in microvascular anastomosis can significantly increase procedural difficulty and elevate the risk of thrombosis. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify articles addressing surgical techniques for overcoming caliber mismatch in microvascular anastomosis. Various techniques described in the literature were found: modifications of end-to-end anastomosis, the use of end-to-side anastomosis, the application of vessel grafts and the use of vessel couplers. In this review, we critically analyze these techniques and introduce additional technical variations. We discuss the options and express our preferred choice of methods based on specific clinical scenarios: if an alternative vessel (either new or isolated further away) is not found, the severity of the mismatch guides the choice. When less then 1/3 our choice is for vessel dilation and oblique cut of the smaller vessel end (if necessary with the adjunct of a titanium small Ligaclip in an oblique fashion to avoid a cul-de-sac). If caliber mismatch is around or over 1/3, we would prefer an end to side anastomosis.
微血管吻合术中的管径不匹配会显著增加手术难度并提高血栓形成风险。我们在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌学术上进行了全面的文献检索,以查找有关克服微血管吻合术中管径不匹配的手术技术的文章。我们发现了文献中描述的各种技术:端端吻合术的改良、端侧吻合术的应用、血管移植物的使用以及血管吻合器的使用。在本综述中,我们对这些技术进行了批判性分析,并介绍了其他技术变体。我们讨论了各种选择,并根据具体临床情况表达了我们偏爱的方法:如果未找到替代血管(新血管或距离更远的孤立血管),则管径不匹配的严重程度会指导选择。当不匹配小于1/3时,我们选择血管扩张和较小血管端的斜切(如有必要,可斜向使用钛制小结扎夹以避免盲端)。如果管径不匹配约为或超过1/3,我们更倾向于端侧吻合术。