• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病理学驱动的自动化,以改善结肠镜检查后电子健康记录中记录的随访建议的更新。

Pathology-Driven Automation to Improve Updating Documented Follow-Up Recommendations in the Electronic Health Record After Colonoscopy.

作者信息

Stevens Elizabeth R, Nagler Arielle, Monina Casey, Kwon JaeEun, Olesen Wickline Amanda, Kalkut Gary, Ranson David, Gross Seth A, Shaukat Aasma, Szerencsy Adam

机构信息

Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Health Informatics, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 1;15(12):e00785. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000785.

DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000785
PMID:39665587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11671091/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Failure to document colonoscopy follow-up needs postpolypectomy can lead to delayed detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). Automating the update of a unified follow-up date in the electronic health record (EHR) may increase the number of patients with guideline-concordant CRC follow-up screening.

METHODS

Prospective pre-post design study of an automated rules engine-based tool using colonoscopy pathology results to automate updates to documented CRC screening due dates was performed as an operational initiative, deployed enterprise-wide May 2023. Participants were aged 45-75 years who received a colonoscopy November 2022 to November 2023. Primary outcome measure is rate of updates to screening due dates and proportion with recommended follow-up < 10 years. Multivariable log-binomial regression was performed (relative risk, 95% confidence intervals).

RESULTS

Study population included 9,824 standard care and 19,340 intervention patients. Patients had a mean age of 58.6 ± 8.6 years and were 53.4% female, 69.6% non-Hispanic White, 13.5% non-Hispanic Black, 6.5% Asian, and 4.6% Hispanic. Postintervention, 46.7% of follow-up recommendations were updated by the rules engine. The proportion of patients with a 10-year default follow-up frequency significantly decreased (88.7%-42.8%, P < 0.001). The mean follow-up frequency decreased by 1.9 years (9.3-7.4 years, P < 0.001). Overall likelihood of an updated follow-up date significantly increased (relative risk 5.62, 95% confidence intervals: 5.30-5.95, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

An automated rules engine-based tool has the potential to increase the accuracy of colonoscopy follow-up dates recorded in patient EHR. The results emphasize the opportunity for more automated and integrated solutions for updating and maintaining EHR health maintenance activities.

摘要

引言

未能记录结肠镜检查息肉切除术后的随访需求可能导致结直肠癌(CRC)的检测延迟。在电子健康记录(EHR)中自动更新统一的随访日期可能会增加接受符合指南的CRC随访筛查的患者数量。

方法

作为一项运营举措,于2023年5月在全企业范围内部署了一项基于自动化规则引擎的工具的前瞻性前后设计研究,该工具使用结肠镜检查病理结果自动更新记录的CRC筛查到期日期。参与者年龄在45 - 75岁之间,于2022年11月至2023年11月接受了结肠镜检查。主要结局指标是筛查到期日期的更新率以及随访建议<10年的比例。进行了多变量对数二项回归分析(相对风险,95%置信区间)。

结果

研究人群包括9824名接受标准护理的患者和19340名干预组患者。患者的平均年龄为58.6±8.6岁,女性占53.4%,非西班牙裔白人占69.6%,非西班牙裔黑人占13.5%,亚洲人占6.5%,西班牙裔占4.6%。干预后,46.7%的随访建议由规则引擎进行了更新。默认随访频率为10年的患者比例显著下降(88.7% - 42.8%,P < 0.001)。平均随访频率下降了1.9年(9.3 - 7.4年,P < 0.001)。随访日期更新的总体可能性显著增加(相对风险5.62,95%置信区间:5.30 - 5.95,P < 0.001)。

讨论

基于自动化规则引擎的工具有可能提高患者EHR中记录的结肠镜检查随访日期的准确性。研究结果强调了采用更多自动化和集成解决方案来更新和维护EHR健康维护活动的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff5/11671091/0dc04bff0ca1/ct9-15-e00785-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff5/11671091/5dcd77979738/ct9-15-e00785-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff5/11671091/e6ad813e7cd1/ct9-15-e00785-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff5/11671091/0dc04bff0ca1/ct9-15-e00785-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff5/11671091/5dcd77979738/ct9-15-e00785-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff5/11671091/e6ad813e7cd1/ct9-15-e00785-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ff5/11671091/0dc04bff0ca1/ct9-15-e00785-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Pathology-Driven Automation to Improve Updating Documented Follow-Up Recommendations in the Electronic Health Record After Colonoscopy.病理学驱动的自动化,以改善结肠镜检查后电子健康记录中记录的随访建议的更新。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 1;15(12):e00785. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000785.
2
Association Between Primary Care Visits and Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the Era of Population Health Outreach.人口健康推广时代初级保健就诊与结直肠癌筛查结果之间的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Oct;31(10):1190-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3760-9. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
3
An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.一项采用逐步增加支持的自动化干预措施以提高结直肠癌筛查率的随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 1):301-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00002.
4
Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在联邦合格健康中心开展集中结直肠癌筛查外展活动:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.
5
Screening colonoscopy versus sigmoidoscopy: implications of a negative examination for cancer prevention and racial disparities in average-risk patients.结肠镜筛查与乙状结肠镜检查:阴性检查结果对一般风险患者癌症预防及种族差异的影响
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Nov;80(5):852-61.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 May 6.
6
A Multilevel Primary Care Intervention to Improve Follow-Up of Overdue Abnormal Cancer Screening Test Results: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.多层面初级保健干预以改善逾期异常癌症筛查检测结果的随访:一项群组随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Oct 10;330(14):1348-1358. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.18755.
7
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve the Accuracy of Follow-Up Surveillance Time Intervals in the Electronic Health Record After a Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.一项随机对照试验,旨在提高结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查后电子健康记录中随访监测时间间隔的准确性。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003497.
8
Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial.在服务不足人群中提高结直肠癌筛查率的粪便免疫化学试验外展、结肠镜外展与常规护理的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14;173(18):1725-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9294.
9
Computer aided detection and diagnosis of polyps in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy: a living clinical practice guideline.成年结肠镜检查患者息肉的计算机辅助检测与诊断:一份现行临床实践指南
BMJ. 2025 Mar 27;388:e082656. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082656.
10
Predicting advanced neoplasia at colonoscopy in a diverse population with the National Cancer Institute colorectal cancer risk-assessment tool.使用美国国立癌症研究所结直肠癌风险评估工具预测不同人群结肠镜检查时的进展期肿瘤形成情况。
Cancer. 2016 Sep 1;122(17):2663-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30096. Epub 2016 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2024.2024年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Expert Review.AGA 临床实践更新:结直肠癌筛查和息肉切除术后监测的风险分层:专家综述。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Nov;165(5):1280-1291. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.06.033. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
3
Making Electronic Health Records Both SAFER and SMARTER.让电子健康记录更安全、更智能。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):523-524. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12243.
4
Medical Documentation Burden Among US Office-Based Physicians in 2019: A National Study.2019 年美国办公医生的医疗文档负担:一项全国性研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 May 1;182(5):564-566. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0372.
5
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
6
Colonoscopy Follow-up: U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Updates Recommendations.结肠镜检查随访:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组更新建议。
Am Fam Physician. 2021 Mar 1;103(5):314-316.
7
Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.计算机化临床决策支持系统与护理质量的绝对改善:对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 17;370:m3216. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3216.
8
Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结肠镜检查和息肉切除术后的随访建议:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的共识更新
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):1131-1153.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.026. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
9
Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening.结直肠癌筛查策略。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(2):418-432. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.043. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
The effect of computerized decision support systems on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机化决策支持系统对心血管风险因素的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0824-x.