Reimer Toralf, Stachs Angrit, Veselinovic Kristina, Kühn Thorsten, Heil Jörg, Polata Silke, Marmé Frederik, Müller Thomas, Hildebrandt Guido, Krug David, Ataseven Beyhan, Reitsamer Roland, Ruth Sylvia, Denkert Carsten, Bekes Inga, Zahm Dirk-Michael, Thill Marc, Golatta Michael, Holtschmidt Johannes, Knauer Michael, Nekljudova Valentina, Loibl Sibylle, Gerber Bernd
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
N Engl J Med. 2025 Mar 13;392(11):1051-1064. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2412063. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
Whether surgical axillary staging as part of breast-conserving therapy can be omitted without compromising survival has remained unclear.
In this prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial, we investigated the omission of axillary surgery as compared with sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer staged as T1 or T2 (tumor size, ≤5 cm) who were scheduled to undergo breast-conserving surgery. We report here the per-protocol analysis of invasive disease-free survival (the primary efficacy outcome). To show the noninferiority of the omission of axillary surgery, the 5-year invasive disease-free survival rate had to be at least 85%, and the upper limit of the confidence interval for the hazard ratio for invasive disease or death had to be below 1.271.
A total of 5502 eligible patients (90% with clinical T1 cancer and 79% with pathological T1 cancer) underwent randomization in a 1:4 ratio. The per-protocol population included 4858 patients; 962 were assigned to undergo treatment without axillary surgery (the surgery-omission group), and 3896 to undergo sentinel-lymph-node biopsy (the surgery group). The median follow-up was 73.6 months. The estimated 5-year invasive disease-free survival rate was 91.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.9 to 93.5) among patients in the surgery-omission group and 91.7% (95% CI, 90.8 to 92.6) among patients in the surgery group, with a hazard ratio of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14), which was below the prespecified noninferiority margin. The analysis of the first primary-outcome events (occurrence or recurrence of invasive disease or death from any cause), which occurred in a total of 525 patients (10.8%), showed apparent differences between the surgery-omission group and the surgery group in the incidence of axillary recurrence (1.0% vs. 0.3%) and death (1.4% vs. 2.4%). The safety analysis indicates that patients in the surgery-omission group had a lower incidence of lymphedema, greater arm mobility, and less pain with movement of the arm or shoulder than patients who underwent sentinel-lymph-node biopsy.
In this trial involving patients with clinically node-negative, T1 or T2 invasive breast cancer (90% with clinical T1 cancer and 79% with pathological T1 cancer), omission of surgical axillary staging was noninferior to sentinel-lymph-node biopsy after a median follow-up of 6 years. (Funded by the German Cancer Aid; INSEMA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02466737.).
作为保乳治疗一部分的手术腋窝分期,在不影响生存率的情况下是否可以省略尚不清楚。
在这项前瞻性、随机、非劣效性试验中,我们比较了计划接受保乳手术、临床分期为T1或T2(肿瘤大小≤5 cm)且临床淋巴结阴性的浸润性乳腺癌患者,省略腋窝手术与前哨淋巴结活检的情况。我们在此报告无浸润性疾病生存(主要疗效结局)的符合方案分析。为显示省略腋窝手术的非劣效性,5年无浸润性疾病生存率必须至少为85%,且浸润性疾病或死亡风险比的置信区间上限必须低于1.271。
共有5502例符合条件的患者(90%为临床T1期癌症,79%为病理T1期癌症)按1:4的比例进行随机分组。符合方案人群包括4858例患者;962例被分配接受无腋窝手术的治疗(手术省略组),3896例接受前哨淋巴结活检(手术组)。中位随访时间为73.6个月。手术省略组患者的估计5年无浸润性疾病生存率为91.9%(95%置信区间[CI],89.9至93.5),手术组患者为91.7%(95%CI,90.8至92.6),风险比为0.91(95%CI,0.73至1.14),低于预先设定的非劣效界值。对总共525例患者(10.8%)发生的首次主要结局事件(浸润性疾病的发生或复发或任何原因导致的死亡)的分析显示,手术省略组和手术组在腋窝复发率(1.0%对0.3%)和死亡率(1.4%对2.4%)方面存在明显差异。安全性分析表明,与接受前哨淋巴结活检的患者相比,手术省略组患者淋巴水肿发生率更低,手臂活动度更大,手臂或肩部活动时疼痛更少。
在这项涉及临床淋巴结阴性的T1或T2浸润性乳腺癌患者(90%为临床T1期癌症,79%为病理T1期癌症)的试验中,中位随访6年后,省略手术腋窝分期不劣于前哨淋巴结活检。(由德国癌症援助组织资助;INSEMA ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT02466737。)