Ye Yu, Wu Kairui, Xu Fangyuan, Li Hongtao, Li Xuejun, Hu Peijia, Cheng Hongliang
Graduate School of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Anhui, China.
Graduate School of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong, China.
J Neurol. 2024 Dec 12;272(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12830-2.
Exercise is considered to be an effective method for functional recovery in patients with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), but there is a paucity of research on exercise dosage. There has been no meta-analysis of the effects of exercise therapy for vascular cognitive impairment based on the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) exercise prescription for a seemingly healthy population. We therefore conducted a study to analyze the effects of various exercise therapies on cognitive functioning, physical functioning, and ability to perform activities of daily living in patients diagnosed with vascular cognitive impairment.
Four electronic databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane, were systematically searched for studies examining the effects of exercise on patients with VCI. The exercise interventions were categorized into an ACSM high adherence group versus an ACSM low or indeterminate adherence group, following the recommendations for exercise testing and prescribing for seemingly healthy populations developed by ACSM. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random effects model to compare results among subgroups.
The study encompassed 14 trials involving 1333 subjects. Among these, 8 studies adhered highly to ACSM recommendations, while 6 studies demonstrated low or uncertain adherence. Subgroup analyses revealed differing effects: in the high adherence group, SMDs for cognitive functioning, living ability, and physical functioning were 0.53 (95% CI 0.13-0.94), 0.53 (95% CI 0.11-0.94), and 0.66 (95% CI 0.45-0.87), respectively. Conversely, in the low or indeterminate adherence group, SMDs for cognitive functioning, living ability, and physical functioning were 0.09 (95% CI - 0.13 to 0.32), - 0.11 (95% CI - 0.57 to 0.34), and 0.65 (95% CI - 0.04 to 1.35). We performed subgroup analyses by type of vascular cognitive impairment, and meta-analyses showed positive SMDs of 0.59 (95% CI 0.22-0.97) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.47-0.90) for exercise on cognitive impairment after stroke in terms of cognitive function and physical function, respectively.
The results suggest that exercise interventions exhibiting high adherence to ACSM guidelines yield more favorable outcomes concerning cognitive functioning, physical functioning, and daily living abilities among patients with VCI compared to interventions with low or uncertain adherence to ACSM recommendations.
运动被认为是血管性认知障碍(VCI)患者功能恢复的有效方法,但关于运动剂量的研究较少。基于美国运动医学学院(ACSM)针对看似健康人群的运动处方,尚未有对血管性认知障碍运动疗法效果的荟萃分析。因此,我们开展了一项研究,以分析各种运动疗法对被诊断为血管性认知障碍患者的认知功能、身体功能及日常生活活动能力的影响。
系统检索了四个电子数据库,即PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane,以查找研究运动对VCI患者影响的研究。按照ACSM制定的针对看似健康人群的运动测试和处方建议,将运动干预分为ACSM高依从性组与ACSM低依从性或不确定依从性组。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以比较亚组间的结果。
该研究纳入了14项试验,涉及1333名受试者。其中,8项研究高度遵循ACSM建议,而6项研究显示依从性低或不确定。亚组分析显示出不同的效果:在高依从性组中,认知功能、生活能力和身体功能的标准化均数差(SMD)分别为0.53(95%可信区间0.13 - 0.94)、0.53(95%可信区间0.11 - 0.94)和0.66(95%可信区间0.45 - 0.87)。相反,在低依从性或不确定依从性组中,认知功能、生活能力和身体功能的SMD分别为0.09(95%可信区间 - 0.13至0.32)、 - 0.11(95%可信区间 - 0.57至0.34)和0.65(95%可信区间 - 0.04至1.35)。我们按血管性认知障碍类型进行了亚组分析,荟萃分析显示,就认知功能和身体功能而言,运动对中风后认知障碍的SMD分别为0.59(95%可信区间0.22 - 0.97)和0.68(95%可信区间0.47 - 0.90)。
结果表明,与低依从性或不确定依从性于ACSM建议的干预措施相比,高度遵循ACSM指南的运动干预在VCI患者的认知功能、身体功能和日常生活能力方面产生更有利的结果。