Fiore Simon, Mabbe Elien, Luyten Patrick, Vliegen Nicole, Soenens Bart
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 May;54(5):1140-1162. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02117-0. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
Autonomy-supportive parenting benefits adolescents' psychosocial adjustment, but daily fluctuations in adolescent difficulties and parenting stress can reduce autonomy support and lead to more controlling practices. However, currently it is not yet well understood why some parents seem better able to deal with the daily upheavals characteristic of adolescence, while other parents may resort to controlling practices. To address this gap, the present studies examined the moderating role of parental reflective functioning (i.e., parents' capacity to understand their adolescent's behavior in terms of mental states) in the daily relationships between adolescent difficulties, parental stress, and autonomy-supportive or controlling parenting. Two 7-day diary studies were conducted, of which Study 1 involved 220 parents of early adolescents (M = 13.05 years, SD = 0.87, range 10-15, 66% female) and Study 2 involved 161 parents of middle adolescents (M = 15.56 years, SD = 1.14, range = 13-18, 61.5% female). Multilevel analyses indicated that daily perceived externalizing difficulties and parental stress were associated with less autonomy-supportive and more controlling parenting. Furthermore, prementalizing (i.e., attributing malevolent intentions to adolescents) predicted less autonomy support and more controlling parenting. Greater interest and curiosity about adolescents' mental states buffered the associations between middle adolescents' (internalizing and externalizing) difficulties and parent-reported controlling parenting. These findings highlight the role of both parent and adolescent characteristics in day-to-day parenting fluctuations and underscore the importance of parental reflective functioning in understanding variations in autonomy-supportive and controlling practices.
自主性支持型养育方式有利于青少年的心理社会适应,但青少年日常困难和养育压力的波动会减少自主性支持,并导致更多的控制性养育行为。然而,目前尚不清楚为什么有些父母似乎更能应对青少年时期特有的日常动荡,而另一些父母可能会采取控制性养育方式。为了填补这一空白,本研究考察了父母反思功能(即父母从心理状态角度理解青少年行为的能力)在青少年困难、父母压力与自主性支持型或控制性养育方式的日常关系中的调节作用。我们进行了两项为期7天的日记研究,其中研究1涉及220名青少年早期孩子的父母(平均年龄M = 13.05岁,标准差SD = 0.87,年龄范围10 - 15岁,66%为女性),研究2涉及161名青少年中期孩子的父母(平均年龄M = 15.56岁,标准差SD = 1.14,年龄范围13 - 18岁,61.5%为女性)。多层次分析表明,日常感知到的外化困难和父母压力与自主性支持减少及更多控制性养育方式相关。此外,预心理化(即将恶意意图归因于青少年)预示着自主性支持减少和更多控制性养育方式。对青少年心理状态更大的兴趣和好奇心缓冲了青少年中期(内化和外化)困难与父母报告的控制性养育方式之间的关联。这些发现凸显了父母和青少年特征在日常养育波动中的作用,并强调了父母反思功能在理解自主性支持型和控制性养育方式差异方面的重要性。