Sidwell MacKenzie D, Wu Shengtian, Contreras Berenice
Department of Counseling, Higher Education Leadership, Educational Psychology, and Foundations, Mississippi State University.
Department of Psychology, Illinois State University.
Sch Psychol. 2025 Mar;40(2):133-144. doi: 10.1037/spq0000668. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
Educators use behavioral interventions to help children with behavioral concerns in school settings. Research on these interventions has shown that they can be effective in reducing concerning behaviors in students of different ages, educational settings, and behavioral topographies. However, Black male students continue to be disproportionately punished in schools. Although various factors (e.g., systemic racism) likely contributed to this issue, a review of the research participants of evidence-based interventions reported by the What Works Clearinghouse found a lack of representation of Black children in the studies. Without research on the effectiveness of interventions for Black male students, educators and researchers may perpetuate the current problem. This necessitates examining their representation in such research to inform effective behavioral interventions at schools. The criteria for inclusion were as follows: (a) journal articles and unpublished dissertations or theses, (b) participants who were children aged 3-18 years, (c) interventions targeting behavioral modification to reduce problem behaviors, (d) studies conducted in school settings, and (e) research utilizing single-subject designs. The results of the review included 15 studies with a total of 34 Black male participants. Of the studies reviewed, the majority were not function-based and did not meet the What Works Clearinghouse's design standards without reservations. Limitations and practical implications within a cultural context are also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
教育工作者运用行为干预措施来帮助在学校环境中存在行为问题的儿童。对这些干预措施的研究表明,它们在减少不同年龄、教育环境和行为表现的学生的问题行为方面可能是有效的。然而,黑人男学生在学校中仍然受到不成比例的惩罚。尽管各种因素(如系统性种族主义)可能导致了这个问题,但对“有效信息交换所”报告的循证干预措施的研究参与者进行审查后发现,研究中缺乏黑人儿童的代表性。如果没有关于针对黑人男学生的干预措施有效性的研究,教育工作者和研究人员可能会使当前的问题持续存在。这就需要审查他们在这类研究中的代表性,以便为学校有效的行为干预提供信息。纳入标准如下:(a)期刊文章和未发表的博士论文或硕士论文;(b)年龄在3至18岁的儿童参与者;(c)旨在通过行为矫正减少问题行为的干预措施;(d)在学校环境中进行的研究;(e)采用单一被试设计的研究。审查结果包括15项研究,共有34名黑人男学生参与者。在所审查的研究中,大多数不是基于功能的,并且不完全符合“有效信息交换所”的设计标准。还讨论了文化背景下的局限性和实际意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)