Tuicomepee Arunya, Wiwattanapantuwong Juthatip, Suttiwan Panrapee, Watakakosol Rewadee, Iamsupasit Sompoch, Phupha Phummaret
Faculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Center of Excellence in Universal Design, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 12;19(12):e0311284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311284. eCollection 2024.
Although aging well and aging in place policies have been encouraged in many countries, a consistent challenge is insufficient evidence on older migrants. This study compared mental well-being models of older adults between aging in place and aging migrant groups. The model included social factors (e.g., social well-being) and personal factors (e.g., cognitive function and psychological distress).
Participants were 334 Thais (187 aging in place, 147 aging migrants). Their mean age was 69.79 ± 7.28 years old. All met the selection criteria: age 60 years or over, voluntary participation, and ability to visit the community area for study participation. Instruments were The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS), 21-item Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale, 15-item Social Well-Being Scale, and 5-item WHO Well-being Index. Data were collected in the five regions of Thailand from March 2021 to February 2022. Local psychologists and research assistants assessed and interviewed the participants. Maximum likelihood with the Satorra-Bentler correction was used for parameter estimation.
Both models fit the empirical data. The multi-group model estimation yielded a difference between the models. The factors of the aging in place group that were associated with mental well-being were psychological distress (SE = 0.08, p < .001) and cognitive function (SE = 0.07, p < .001), but not social well-being (SE = 0.09, ns). For the migrant group, psychological distress (SE = 0.12, p < .01) and social well-being (SE = 0.11, p < .001) were significant predictors of mental well-being, but not of cognitive function (SE = 0.12, ns).
By understanding differences in the mental well-being models between the two groups, policy makers and service providers can better address the needs of older adults. Policies and programs should be designed to reduce their psychological distress. Maintaining social connections can be crucial for migrants, while activities such as lifelong learning and physical activities to enhance cognitive function can benefit people who are aging in place.
尽管许多国家都鼓励健康老龄化和就地养老政策,但一个持续存在的挑战是缺乏关于老年移民的充分证据。本研究比较了就地养老群体和老年移民群体中老年人的心理健康模型。该模型包括社会因素(如社会幸福感)和个人因素(如认知功能和心理困扰)。
参与者为334名泰国人(187名就地养老者,147名老年移民)。他们的平均年龄为69.79±7.28岁。所有人均符合入选标准:年龄60岁及以上、自愿参与且有能力前往社区地区参与研究。使用的工具包括改良简易精神状态检查表(3MS)、21项抑郁、焦虑、压力量表、15项社会幸福感量表和5项世界卫生组织幸福感指数。数据于2021年3月至2022年2月在泰国的五个地区收集。当地心理学家和研究助理对参与者进行评估和访谈。参数估计采用带萨托拉 - 本特勒校正的最大似然法。
两个模型均拟合实证数据。多组模型估计显示模型之间存在差异。就地养老群体中与心理健康相关的因素是心理困扰(标准误 = 0.08,p <.001)和认知功能(标准误 = 0.07,p <.001),但不是社会幸福感(标准误 = 0.09,无显著性差异)。对于移民群体,心理困扰(标准误 = 0.12,p <.01)和社会幸福感(标准误 = 0.11,p <.001)是心理健康的显著预测因素,但不是认知功能的预测因素(标准误 = 0.12,无显著性差异)。
通过了解两组之间心理健康模型的差异,政策制定者和服务提供者可以更好地满足老年人的需求。应设计政策和项目以减轻他们的心理困扰。保持社会联系对移民可能至关重要,而诸如终身学习和体育活动等增强认知功能的活动对就地养老的人有益。