Gaesser Glenn A, Angadi Siddhartha S, Paterson Craig, Jones Julie Miller
College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Nov 2;8(12):104501. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104501. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Because bread can contain potential carcinogens such as acrylamide, and is widely consumed, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether bread consumption is associated with increased cancer risk. PubMed and Medline databases were searched up to 1 March 2024, for studies that provided hazard ratios (HRs) (or similar) for bread consumption and cancer incidence or mortality. Only prospective cohort studies were included. We used the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Meta-analysis was performed with Cochrane's RevMan 5.4.1 software using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane's (χ) and statistics, and publication bias was assessed with Egger's test. Twenty-four publications met inclusion criteria, including 1,887,074 adults, and were included in the systematic review. Ten publications that provided HRs were included in the meta-analysis for highest compared with lowest intakes, and an additional 7 publications that provided mortality or incident rate ratios or relative risks were included in supplemental meta-analyses. Of 108 reported HRs (or similar), 97 (79%) were either not statistically significant ( = 86) or indicated lower cancer risk ( = 11) associated with the highest intakes of bread. The meta-analysis indicated that bread intake was not associated with site-specific cancer risk [HR: 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89, 1.14; = 0.92; 8 publications] or total cancer mortality (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.11; = 0.32; 2 publications). Supplemental meta-analyses using all risk estimates in addition to HRs confirmed these findings. Whole-grain bread was associated with a lower site-specific cancer risk, mainly because of reduced colorectal cancer risk. Results of the systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that bread consumption is not associated with increased site-specific cancer risk, whereas high whole-grain/nonwhite bread consumption is associated with lower total cancer mortality and colorectal cancer risk. This study was registered at Clinical Trials Registry of PROSPERO as registration number CRD42023414156.
由于面包可能含有丙烯酰胺等潜在致癌物,且食用广泛,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定食用面包是否与癌症风险增加有关。截至2024年3月1日,我们在PubMed和Medline数据库中检索了提供面包食用量与癌症发病率或死亡率的风险比(HRs)(或类似数据)的研究。仅纳入前瞻性队列研究。我们使用了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目清单。使用Cochrane的RevMan 5.4.1软件,采用DerSimonian-Laird随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。用Cochrane的χ²和I²统计量评估异质性,用Egger检验评估发表偏倚。24篇出版物符合纳入标准,包括1,887,074名成年人,并被纳入系统评价。10篇提供HRs的出版物被纳入最高摄入量与最低摄入量比较的荟萃分析,另外7篇提供死亡率或发病率比或相对风险的出版物被纳入补充荟萃分析。在报告的108个HRs(或类似数据)中,97个(79%)在统计学上无显著意义(n = 86)或表明与最高面包摄入量相关的癌症风险较低(n = 11)。荟萃分析表明,面包摄入量与特定部位癌症风险无关[HR:1.01;95%置信区间(CI):0.89,1.14;I² = 0.92;8篇出版物]或总癌症死亡率无关(HR:0.90;95% CI:0.73,1.11;I² = 0.32;2篇出版物)。使用除HRs之外的所有风险估计值进行的补充荟萃分析证实了这些发现。全麦面包与较低的特定部位癌症风险相关,主要是因为结直肠癌风险降低。系统评价和荟萃分析的结果表明,食用面包与特定部位癌症风险增加无关,而高全麦/非白面包食用量与较低的总癌症死亡率和结直肠癌风险相关。本研究已在PROSPERO临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为CRD42023414156。