Suppr超能文献

内侧半月板根部撕裂的半月板修复与保守治疗的功能及影像学结果——一项前瞻性对比研究

Functional and Radiological Outcome of Meniscal Repair and Conservative Management for Medial Meniscal Root Tear - A Prospective Comparative Study.

作者信息

Kumar K V Arun, Thavasianantham Krishnavel, Pandian Prashanth, Pandian Haemanath, Pradeep E, Mohideen Sheik

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Chettinad Hospital and Research Education, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Dec;14(12):223-228. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i12.5080.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To sustain hoop stress, prevent extrusion, and maintaining the function of the meniscus, the posterior root attachment point of the medial meniscus is essential. The purpose of this study is to determine the functional and radiological outcome of conservative therapy and meniscal repair for medial meniscal root tears.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective evaluations were performed on forty individuals who confirmed a diagnosis of Medial meniscus root tear (MMRT). Among the 40 patients, 20 underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair and 20 underwent conservative management and followed up a period of 2 years. Functional outcome between two groups was measured using Tegner Lysholm score and IKDC score. Radiological outcome was measured using X-rays (medial joint space width, joint space narrowing, K-L grade).

RESULTS

Both group showed improvement in Lysholm score and IKDC. When comparing the clinical outcomes between both the groups, Group A showed significantly better outcome (P = 0.02). About 60% of patients in Group A and all patients in Group B showed K-L grade progression. Of the patients in Group A, 5% had significant K-L grade progression and 10% had severe joint space constriction. Of the patients in Group B, 80% had significant K-L grade progression and 25% had severe joint space constriction. Meniscal repair had considerably superior outcomes for radiologic parameters than conservative care (P < 0.01) when we examined the final results of Groups A and B.

CONCLUSION

The MMRT repair group had better functional and radiological outcome than the conservative treatment group. Although treatment did not entirely stop the advancement of arthrosis, meniscal repair decreased the rate of arthritic changes when compared to the conservative group.

摘要

引言

为了维持环向应力、防止半月板挤出并保持半月板功能,内侧半月板后根附着点至关重要。本研究的目的是确定内侧半月板根部撕裂的保守治疗和半月板修复的功能及影像学结果。

材料与方法

对40例确诊为内侧半月板根部撕裂(MMRT)的患者进行前瞻性评估。在这40例患者中,20例行关节镜下半月板修复,20例行保守治疗,并随访2年。使用Tegner Lysholm评分和IKDC评分来衡量两组之间的功能结果。使用X线(内侧关节间隙宽度、关节间隙变窄、K-L分级)来衡量影像学结果。

结果

两组的Lysholm评分和IKDC评分均有所改善。比较两组的临床结果时,A组的结果明显更好(P = 0.02)。A组约60%的患者和B组所有患者均显示K-L分级进展。A组患者中,5%有明显的K-L分级进展,10%有严重的关节间隙狭窄。B组患者中,80%有明显的K-L分级进展,25%有严重的关节间隙狭窄。当我们检查A组和B组的最终结果时,半月板修复在影像学参数方面的结果明显优于保守治疗(P < 0.01)。

结论

MMRT修复组的功能和影像学结果优于保守治疗组。虽然治疗并未完全阻止关节病的进展,但与保守组相比,半月板修复降低了关节炎变化的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6827/11632469/ace64256d20f/JOCR-14-223-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验